Jump to content

1985 C20 350 Won't Start


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, I'm new to the forum.

 

I picked up a 1985 C20 2 wheel drive 350 a couple days ago and I've been trying to get it to start.

 

This is the first carbed vehicle I've ever owned and I know nothing about them.

 

It will crank all day, and I've tested for spark at both the wires and plugs and I'm getting spark, but it's weak.

 

I've tried putting starting fluid in the carb and it still won't fire.

 

I want to diagnose the issue before I throw parts at it.

 

The previous owner says it started in the fall but ran rough then died. He says it needs a new carb due to a vacuum leak, but it did start.

 

What are some diagnostic procedures I can run through to figure this out?

 

Thanks for any help.

Posted

I think the first thing I'd do is a compression check on the cylinders,it'll help give you an idea on which direction to go.

Posted

Compression is good and the head gaskets are brand new. I messed around with it with a buddy of mine not even 5 minutes ago and he suspects the pick up coil or ignition module or both.

Posted

I was going to suggest the ignition module as well.One went bad on an old '77 GMC I used to have.Make sure the connections to the HEI coil are good also.

Posted

I replaced the plugs, wires, cap, coil, rotor, and ignition module. It still will not start. Any ideas? Things I can check? My next though is the pickup coil but I have no idea how to remove/install that.

Posted

It has a Quadrajet carb that has a vacuum choke which I assumed was automatic.

 

As I've said, I've tried putting starting fluid in the carb and had a friend hold the choke open while I cranked it. It refuses to fire.

Posted

It's not quite as automatic as you think. You still need to manually set the choke it by stomping the gas pedal to the floor once or twice. Do that then crank.. see if it will even sputter.

 

The vacuum leak is usually around the throttle shaft. the butterfly seals could be bad, or the carb body could be worn. Regardless, you need to set that thing at full choke to start.

 

Check EGR to make sure it's not stuck open. Are you getting fuel to the carb? Are the floats set correct? Are the jets plugged? Is there water instead of fuel the bowl?

 

I know you think dumping starter fluid in it will make it fire, but if it's gulping air, then it will never light.

 

 

 

 

Welcome to the world of Carburetors! I actually miss those things.

Posted

Get your learn on first. Then you can pick apart that old one and try to find what's up with it.

 

I've rebuilt a lot of carbs and I understand the frustration.

Posted

Where do you suggest I start? I don't even know what I'm looking at, these quadrajets have so much crap coming out of them.

 

If I set the choke and it still doesn't start, what should I try next? Where is the EGR valve?

 

If I do buy a new carb, what style choke do I want? I'm guessing hot air since I'd assume that's what it has factory. Would electric be better?

Posted

youtube and google. Tons of learning on there.

 

 

I always went with a manual choke. I got tired of the so called auto chokes failing and killing the motor.

 

The egr is on the back of your intake manifold, round lookin thing. When they go bad they usually get stuck open.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Replaced the carb today. Still won't start. It will give a chug like it's about to fire a few times, but won't fire up. Not sure what to do at this point.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

first i would check to see if your getting 12V to the distributor when your cranking it over. also check your base timing, and TDC on cylinder 1 and excess play in the timing chain. if all is good it should start..

 

good luck

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,063 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...