Jump to content

Magnacharger not impressed


Recommended Posts

Posted

I got to drive a magnacharged escalade last night, i was expecting a lot more performance from a blown truck. I was expecting it to feel more like my c6 or a flashed duramax. It really doesnt feel like it pulls all that hard to me.

Posted

I have one on my 03,denali and it's night and day. I do have a aftermarket cam, headers, and smaller pulley for about 7.5lbs of boost, but that 6.2 escalade should still pull hard. If the blower isn't seated right on the heads it will blow boost out the gasket. Or maybe the tune was off. Either way it should haul

Posted

Could be the power delivery too. I know my friends tunned cummins dodge dually feels like it hits harder because of the turbo, but my truck is actually quicker in the 1/4 by a good margin

Could be the power delivery too. I know my friends tunned cummins dodge dually feels like it hits harder because of the turbo, but my truck is actually quicker in the 1/4 by a good margin

Posted

I'm guessing something in the tune or they are running very little boost. I have a Magnacharger on my 2007 6.0 with a Black Bear tune. I'm running 7.8lbs of boost and making right at 500hp at the wheels. It runs very hard FOR A TRUCK THAT WEIGHS ALMOST 6000lbs. It will out run my dads bully dog tuned duramax.

 

But, even with making around 600hp my power to weight ratio isn't going to out run a vette.

 

I could pulley down and boost the crap out of it though and make a lot more power, but at that point I would want a turbo anyway.

Posted

I ran it again tonight with all traction control off and stabilitrac off made a big difference. From a dead stop its definately snappy, I expected more pull from it just never driven one so wasnt sure how they run. It seems doggy to me from a roll on like it should have the tq to lug a gear where instead it downshifts. Likely it is in the tune. Id still like to try a magnacharger on my 5.3 though. Im pretty sure our 2013 duramax with the edge 81 hp tune is faster than this sc escalade.

Posted

I have a 2008 Silverado with a 5.3 and a Roush supercharger (basically the same thing as a Maggie) with a Blackbear tune. Had it Dyno'd last week and got 400 hp with 450 ft lb of torque. I think it that's pretty impressive, to say the least, and I absolutely love it....!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You refuse to own anything made in this century yet you reportedly own... a 2007 Silverado, which is now almost 20 years old. The dissonance.... turn up your hearing aid?   You clearly don't understand the government contracting process, brother. We send people to die on front lines, keep the public safe, and make people's husbands, wives, children enter burning buildings with equipment from .....wait for it.....   ...the lowest bidder....   Just because something is used for a long time doesn't mean it's good. But it might be cheap and plentiful.   Please, continue to whine about new trucks in a thread dedicated to new trucks, which you've said you'll never own. We get it. Go tell everyone how you're stuck in time on a Panther forum. I mean, Jesus, an 86 isn't even one of the good Panthers.
    • It really is comical when people don’t agree or see the reason some people prefer the older vehicles. They become condescending. All the while they may be busting their knuckles on old vehicles. I have found memories of swapping out engines in my old GM cars in a weekend without much hassle. Unlike today. One wrong move a computer will shut you down. Even on something as easy as a brake job. There’s a pretty comical YouTuber called the car wizard. A garage owner who puts it all in perspective. Another Vicegrip garage that’s shows just how tough the old stuff is. 
    • I was around and remember that era very well, so I'm calling b/s on that statement. If they were that bad no police department or taxi company would've bought a single one ... but they were used in both services (and fire) for DECADES. They were bulletproof and proven. Even the early 21st century ones weren't too bad! The early models were legendary.   Mine is proof, but people like atlas are blinded by agenda and refuse to believe facts right before their very eyes.   Even decades after they were built, a new generation started driving them, posting all their builds and shenanigans on Grandmarq.net and Crownvic.net. The failures would show up then, since they all were deep past 100k-150k miles by that point, and younger drivers tend to be a little aggressive, especially with vehicles than can lay a one-tire fire for as long as you hold your foot in it. They've more than proven themselves over the decades.   The only thing that'll really take them out is road salt. The bodies and sheet metal were garbage. A victim of the cheapout FoMoCo and GM have been partaking in before then, and since.   Today it's the stuff that counts - the undercarriage that rots away first!    GMs Caprice was no slouch either. Reliable as a stone ax - the opposite of what they build now.    
    • Let me know how your vehicles do in 10 years. You don't know ******, kid. 😂    There's a reason that Panther platform was used as police, fire, and taxi service for DECADES ... long before you were born, apparently.
    • If your connector also has a big lever to get the connector on and off, you don't want to force the lever either way, as it becomes a bigger problem if you bust the lever or the mechanism it works.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...