Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The paint was awesome. They did a ligenfelter (555) LS3 6 speed.

 

 

Ryan

Chip is an artist he does some great work. You don't have to agree with it but you have to agree he is talented

 

 

Ryan

I'll try to find the link

 

 

Here it is.

 

http://forums.performanceyears.com/forums/showthread.php?t=765319

 

Used parts from the wrong YEARS AND BRAND!

 

 

But, some of the hate is from cranky guys too as you will read

Edited by SnakeEyes
Posted

But you have to understand they weren't trying to go for original numbers matching. Just making a cool car.

 

 

Ryan

Posted

Wow those guys need to loosen up their under roos haha. They seem to despise the LS3 engine. Good thing I have an L99 haha

 

 

Ryan

Posted

I just took a look... Lots of GM haters in that thread.

Someone call a Waaaaambulance!

 

800px-waaah.jpg

 

wambulance.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I just took a look... Lots of GM haters in that thread.

 

GM haters? Lol, you must have never heard of PY before. Its a Pontiac specific site. Its THE Pontiac specific site. A LOT of purists, that's why they are so cranky, you need to see where they are coming from. Pontiac is gone, they want history preserved, not Camaro parts installed. Most people don't even know the Firebird was the corner carver of the 1st gen F-bodys, due to the BOP V8 being considerably lighter than the BBC.

 

 

Here is an extreme example:

There is a guy there right now restoring a dilapidated 69 TA, to assembly line correct status. The guy spent over 100,000 doing the same to a dodge four door worth maybe 18K now.

 

He bought a mint, original owner 69 Firebird 400 with low miles, that had the same interior as the 69 TA had, when it still had one.

 

He is going to use the Mint car as a donor to the rust bucket TA. Interior swap, cut out body panels, etc. He is going to destroy a time capsule car to restore a semi-rare one.

 

But, many of them actually like my car. It's been pretty heavily altered, you may know, so why do they like it?

 

Its all Pontiac. It uses high performance parts from Pontiac boutique/race shops, based on Pontiac V8 architecture.

Edited by SnakeEyes
Posted

Oops! OK...Pontiac purists. Go figure.

 

Thanks for the correction.

 

Purists I can understand...but not THAT rabid.

Posted (edited)

But you have to understand they weren't trying to go for original numbers matching. Just making a cool car.

 

 

Ryan

Like I said, haven't watched it.

 

Its not like most people will be upset, they went from a rust bucket, to a car they could flip for good money and buy what they really want if they aren't happy with it. That would be my mindset. I remember seeing on a website where they actually tracked how fast people sold their cars from these shows. I think "Pimp my ride" people dumped their cars pretty quick :lol:.

 

Wonder what the tax situation is with these cars? Technically they would have to claim the value of the restoration? Wonder if the show covers that.

 

 

One thing gets me:

The second firebird they did, supposedly the owner had started restoring it to original condition, and they took those parts out? That's pretty arrogant if true!

Edited by SnakeEyes
Posted

Eh honestly I can't stand the #'s matching extremists. They can look down on the guy with the "ls" swap in his rust bucket Camaro all they want, but fact is his is faster for 10% of the money. They can look down on '80's Germans too, but once again, they're also faster. :)

 

That said, I don't care for many of Foose's jobs. Have seen plenty of cars done in farm shops and garages that I'd rather have.

Posted

Oops! OK...Pontiac purists. Go figure.

 

Thanks for the correction.

 

Purists I can understand...but not THAT rabid.

They aren't mean to people on the site, its usually very friendly. The worst it gets is people just groan and moan a lot when someone shows up with a GTO or Firebird with a SBC 350. (Which is startlingly common.)

 

Imagine here if someone showed off their 69 C-10 SWB with a new Ford Coyote 5.0L, a lot of "What The...." Would ensue.

Posted (edited)

Eh honestly I can't stand the #'s matching extremists. They can look down on the guy with the "ls" swap in his rust bucket Camaro all they want, but fact is his is faster for 10% of the money. They can look down on '80's Germans too, but once again, they're also faster. :)

 

That said, I don't care for many of Foose's jobs. Have seen plenty of cars done in farm shops and garages that I'd rather have.

A lot of bad info here.

Don't take this as an insult, we are all partially here to learn stuff, right? I'm sure your talking about FI LS cars, so go look at GMPP crate motors, yes, the LS ones..... Engines designed for FI make more power with a carb. The race spec ones. Rated for more power with a carb. Now, go look at crate engine prices. Carbed engines make more power for less money. Example: turn key 430HP engine at summit for $4500, turn key LS3 is $8K WITHOUT electronics, which is a few thousand more. A connect and cruise kit(engine, trans, and all electronics) is $13K.

 

 

And 80s German cars? Guess you weren't around this site when I owned, modified, and semi-restored one myself? They handle and are wonderfully engineered, but fast, they are not. Unless your talking about the high geared V12's, which one engine repair costs more than the car.

Edited by SnakeEyes
Posted

Oops! OK...Pontiac purists. Go figure.

 

Thanks for the correction.

 

Purists I can understand...but not THAT rabid.

PY and v8Buick are pretty dedicated to their brands and their originality. Not that they don't race them, but there is certain disdain for nontraditional parts. Both are good sites, full of guys who really know what they are talking about.

Posted

I got over being a purist, last one was a mint restored 64 el Camino. It was black 4 speed, factory air. It drove me crazy. That's why I play with my 92 Chevy truck 1/3 the money 10 times the fun.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

A lot of bad info here.

Don't take this as an insult, we are all partially here to learn stuff, right? I'm sure your talking about FI LS cars, so go look at GMPP crate motors, yes, the LS ones..... Engines designed for FI make more power with a carb. The race spec ones. Rated for more power with a carb. Now, go look at crate engine prices. Carbed engines make more power for less money. Example: turn key 430HP engine at summit for $4500, turn key LS3 is $8K WITHOUT electronics, which is a few thousand more. A connect and cruise kit(engine, trans, and all electronics) is $13K.

 

 

And 80s German cars? Guess you weren't around this site when I owned, modified, and semi-restored one myself? They handle and are wonderfully engineered, but fast, they are not. Unless your talking about the high geared V12's, which one engine repair costs more than the car.

My point wasn't ls power, what I was trying to convey is that I don't really understand people dissing non original cars, when so much can be gained by a newer/modified powerplant, whether it be FI or carb. Like your car, lol.

 

What's your definition of fast? This is basically where I want mine as far as mods.

 

 

Posted (edited)

My point wasn't ls power, what I was trying to convey is that I don't really understand people dissing non original cars, when so much can be gained by a newer/modified powerplant, whether it be FI or carb. Like your car, lol.

 

What's your definition of fast? This is basically where I want mine as far as mods.

 

 

Those cars weren't designed for straight line speed in mind. The germans simply didn't care, and that was the beauty of their cars then. It was once they started moving more cars in the American markets that it became more important to them.

 

BMW is the PRIME example.

You could probably track the increase in BMW sales in america, straight line speed, and decline in journalists impressions on their cars with the same line on a graph.

 

Onto the video.

So more than 20 seconds to get to 124 mph?(video starts a little under 20 kph, so never see the launch if there was one). Not bad for an 80s four banger, OE 80s German Looks like the second run gets there in roughly 18.

 

In the grand scheme though, Stock 4th gen LS1 gets there several seconds faster.

 

 

They weren't dissing the bird because it was " non original" they were because it was "non 67 firebird". If overhaulin had used the correct body parts and correct lights there wouldn't have been nearly as much fuss.(again I didn't see it) I think one person even saw they were using sub par quality brand parts (suggesting Chinese made knock offs that wouldn't live up to 60s quality control, as there wasn't any, the new cars had like a 6 month warranty then .)

Edited by SnakeEyes
Posted

They got their parts from classic industries for the build

 

 

Ryan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,127 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks newdude!  By the time manual selection is needed, I'm probably too much of a control-freak to depend on the transmission sensing braking to activate automatic downshifting.  I would be anticipating the situation and already be manually downshifting.   This truck replaced a 2004.5 LLY diesel with the Allison 5-speed.  Putting it in T/H made noticeable differences (when the torque converter locked, upshift points, downshift behavior).  On this 2024 gasser with the 10L1000 I haven't been able to detect much, if any, difference.  Ok, I can never tell now when the torque converter locks up.  But I also don't notice differences in shifting.  For downhills, I've probably already manually downshifted by then anyway.  Since it's also more awkward (than the 2004.5) to engage/disengage I don't even bother.  Or maybe it doesn't really matter with just a 3k lb. camper in the bed?   Thanks also for the list of reasons the charging system might select various voltages.  However, what I am seeing doesn't fall into any of those categories.  It very definitely, and very consistently, rises after coasting/braking.  Maybe not immediately, but not very long after coasting/braking.  Very consistently drops voltage when no longer coasting/braking.  It might also be interacting with the camper battery charging (I might disconnect the camper and see if it changes the charging behavior).  I also need to recheck turning on headlights for when I want to force it to charge the camper.   Another JR, in June I converted the camper to LiFePO4.  Since it's not a good idea to try to charge lithiums directly using truck, I installed a Victron Orion XS DC-DC charger (which BTW is AMAZING!!).  Being cheap, I only had to buy that one item (besides the battery, of course) to do the conversion.  The camper OEM 120v battery charger (only 19 years old and works perfectly) and the truck feed the input to the DC-DC charger (not at the same time).  But I didn't want the camper charger feeding back to the truck so I kept the old separator.  I considered replacing the separator with a 30amp diode but that means more work and might add another 1/2 volt drop.  One thing that surprised me was the voltage drop over the long 10awg wire run, so I can only charge smoothly at 8 amps (because the DC-DC charger is completely configurable).  Another reason I don't want an added voltage drop with the diode.  I might also be a little lazy but all this work is being done under the sink with a small cabinet opening.    
    • apparently CA smog is (or at least was)  checking that the vehicle is using the oem and/or a ca smog approved tune, so I expect you'll fail inspection doing it.
    • yes, leaking exhaust will mess up o2 sensor readings, which in turn messes up fuel trims.
    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...