Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Back in the 80's those things were a dime a dozen. Nobody wanted them. Anything '72 and back was in demand, and compared to today, "demand" isn't a word you'd have used.

 

I would've stockpiled all those cars if I knew what was coming 30 years later .... :(

Posted

Are you kidding I had a 74 custom with a 350 I even like the big bumpers all of the 160 HP the 350 put out. And much later a 76, I put a 454 in that one. There're were some performing novas back in the day.

Posted (edited)

Well sure - there were preforming Vegas too ... after we stuffed 350s or big blocks in them. :thumbs:

 

I wasn't much of a Nova guy. Never liked the looks of them. I did like the pre-'73 ones better though.

 

The mid 70's on up was a bad time for stock vehicles - they desperately needed modification. Useless emission crap and powerful insurance lobbies killed the power output almost overnight.

Edited by Jsdirt
Posted

Coated my wheels

 

63321819ebccaf4a261389ac0f94a164.jpg

 

Peekaboo

 

7969c2ced50f0deb26df164489d3e19c.jpg

 

 

Ryan B.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Anything made prior to 1976 is in demand here. No smog testing

 

I want something to toss an LS in and burn tires

Edited by Chris
Posted

Nice - I didn't think CA had any exemptions on emissions. That's about the only good thing about living up here in this hellhole - anything built before a rolling 15 model year timeframe is exempt - so this year 2003 is exempt. Next year, 2004, and so on.

 

Thing is, our roads, road salt, and tropical moisture destroy 99.9% of them ...

 

I'm still waiting for that winning lottery ticket. I want a jet black '69 Grand Marquis convertible with a 428 under the hood, and a '68 GMC C20 with a 400 and peanut heads - a little HP, but ALOT of torque. :) Someday ...

 

5 more years and I can throw a 454 in my Silverado. :D

Posted (edited)

Ryan, go to your nearest hot wheels selling store now.

 

BGSMRKV.jpg

 

My wal mart didn't have the #1 (1967) for whatever reason. Hopefully they ran out of shelf space and will put it up soon.

 

I do find it odd the 10 or 13 Camaro isn't the Hot Wheels edition replica instead. And the 50th is absent. Just odd, those two seem like a given

Edited by SnakeEyes
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The taillights look great, but it looks like the 3 seconds is off the 6 speed? The 10 speed ZL1 is a little quicker so I wouldn't trade a second or 2 for the Mag shocks and extra daily liviability. Been there in other cars, not worth it unless you are racing or adding to a collection, judging by reviews of the Z28.

 

If you don't see them soon I can get 2-8 at mine and ship them to you(if they are still there). Priced 1.04 after tax plus shipping. So $21 or so with a priority flat rate medium box(shipping kills it). Most were in really good shape. This is only the second set I have ever bought. :lol:

Edited by SnakeEyes
Posted

Have been checking no walmarts around here have them yet

 

 

Ryan B.

https://www.facebook.com/ChevroletCamaroLover/videos/376078512775227/

 

This is tempting

 

 

Ryan B.

I just don't understand why GM created a track focused ZL1. The ZL1 is supposed to be a straight line performance car. The Z28 is the track version. It's still a beautiful looking car and would be sweet to own.

 

On another note I'm tossing the idea around of possibly buying a new left over 2014 or 2015 Z28. Some dealers have them listed at $50k which I think is a good starting point. What do you guys think?

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted

I just don't understand why GM created a track focused ZL1. The ZL1 is supposed to be a straight line performance car. The Z28 is the track version. It's still a beautiful looking car and would be sweet to own.

 

On another note I'm tossing the idea around of possibly buying a new left over 2014 or 2015 Z28. Some dealers have them listed at $50k which I think is a good starting point. What do you guys think?

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

 

I have seen some for $45-48K. I contemplated it. Gonna stick with mine for now

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,098 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...