Jump to content

3.08 gears on 4x4


Recommended Posts

Posted

I want the change my gears to 3.73. What's all needed to do it? Is it just ring and pinion? Also I know I need a different carrier but don't know if I need both rear and front or just front carrier?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I want the change my gears to 3.73. What's all needed to do it? Is it just ring and pinion? Also I know I need a different carrier but don't know if I need both rear and front or just front carrier?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Unless you are going from open to a locker, you shouldnt need a different carrier at all. Also not something you can do yourself
Posted

Lot of discussions on this. There are several different ways to go about this, no one best way so far. From what I can gather, no one is making a gear set other than the 3.08 that will use the stock carrier. What I assume is needed is a thick ring gear ring/pinion set or a ring gear spacer. AAM makes the rear axle assembly for GM, dimensional info is scarce.

 

Here are a couple links. First is East Coast Gear installing a Yukon gear set and carrier. Second is link to AAM aftermarket. From research I did, front carrier is a non-issue, stock carrier for 3.08 or 3.73.

 

http://eastcoastgearsupply.com/files/PDF%20Files/gm9-5-12-bolt.pdf

 

http://www.demandaam.com/

 

Personally, I'm going to wait it out and see if a true bolt in replacement gear set to fit the 3.08 carrier becomes available.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Going to need a new carrier for a different gear set. The 3.08 carrier is different from all others. Good luck finding your parts!

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

 

 

Sent from my crappy iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

To add to my previous post.......

What is your reason all of a sudden for wanting to change to lower gears?

Why did you buy the truck with 'fuel economy' gears to begin with?

Did you just decide you are going to start towing/hauling heavy loads?

 

 

Sent from my crappy iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

Stay with the current setup or get a new truck imo.

 

I did that. No matter what 1500 was available, it seemed that I was going to have to change a bunch of things, including gears, to make me happy, and there was no guarantee that I would still be happy with the results. I invented new swear words over my 2013 1500. Finally just took it in and traded up to a 2015 2500HD 6.0L 4.10 diff ratio. I am so much happier, and I don't tow very heavy, but I do haul quite a bit frequently. And mpg on this 2500 is as good or slightly better than the 5.3L 3.42 1500 I had before. Now that summer fuel is the norm again, 18 mpg highway is happening. Not bad for a 2500HD LT Z71 double cab 6.0L with snow plow prep package. I had a gut feeling I might not like the 3.42 in the 1500, and my gut feeling played out in reality. Can't even contemplate 3.08.

Posted

Gears, master rebuild kit and a programmer is required to do the job. Your looking at around 2k-3k total paying a good mechanic to do the gear swap if you have 4x4. If its 2wd it will cost around $500-$800

  • 2 months later...
Posted

 

I did that. No matter what 1500 was available, it seemed that I was going to have to change a bunch of things, including gears, to make me happy, and there was no guarantee that I would still be happy with the results. I invented new swear words over my 2013 1500. Finally just took it in and traded up to a 2015 2500HD 6.0L 4.10 diff ratio. I am so much happier, and I don't tow very heavy, but I do haul quite a bit frequently. And mpg on this 2500 is as good or slightly better than the 5.3L 3.42 1500 I had before. Now that summer fuel is the norm again, 18 mpg highway is happening. Not bad for a 2500HD LT Z71 double cab 6.0L with snow plow prep package. I had a gut feeling I might not like the 3.42 in the 1500, and my gut feeling played out in reality. Can't even contemplate 3.08.

I was reading some posts just for fun this morning and came across yours.....so, you really get 18mpg in with the 2500HD. I'm going back and forth on what I'm going to upgrade my 08 z71 1500 too. I've had to modify the heck out of it.......and I'll have to modify the heck out of next one too. If I do the math, I save about $1000 if I go with the 1/2 ton (with my mods). I figure that's ok with the idea I would also get better gas mileage.

My buddy has a 6.0L 3/4 ton silvy double cab.......12mpg without a trailer highway/town, 9-10 with a trailer. If I knew I would sniff 18 in a 3/4 I would be all over it. Is there a certain set a gears you have to get that mpg. I thought they all came with 4.10 in the 3/4 6.0L.

Thanks.

Posted

Yes. 17-18 on road trips. It has a 14.5 mpg lifetime average for all miles... in town, rural, gravel roads, off road on property, etc. Everything. That is almost identical to the 2013 1500 5.3 I had before. Now, to be fair, driving style has as much to do with mpg as anything. Fleet studies have shown that driver operation accounts for 33% of mpg differences. I don't drive like some old retiree, but then I have no desire to floor it from light to light acting like the traffic lights are my own NHRA christmas tree starting lights, or do 85 down the freeway chasing every sports car around. I would fall into what some might call, a moderate driver. Carries over from my semi truck driving. And the 5.3L in the 1500 had 3.42 diffs whereas the 6.0L in the 2500 has 4.10 diffs.

 

You will almost always do better on mpg with the 1/2 ton. You are moving around 1000 lb less right out of the gate! My 2015 2500 6.0L 4.10 double cab, Z71, with snow plow prep package, comes in at 7380 lb with two people, full of fuel, and about 200 lb of tools in the back. If the 1/2 ton will meet your needs, that could be the better way to go. Rear end ratios will be the achilles heel. They just don't offer any good work ratios (at least for my needs and operation) in the 1500 unless you really pull out the stops and get the 6.2L with every other high brow package that includes the 3.73. While, the 2500 with the 6.0, 4.10 is virtually standard across the spectrum. There is a 3.73 version in the brochures, but I have not seen one on a lot. The other problem with something like the 6.2L in the 1/2 ton, is that you are stuck on premium fuel, at least as recommended by GM. Depending on price spreads in your area, the 6.2L in the 1/2 ton and the 6.0L in the 3/4 ton are a total equal when it comes to fuel costs per mile. And that is assuming the 6.2L gets about 3-4 mpg better than the 6.0L, which seems to be the average difference. At least the 6.0L, you can put just about any fuel in it at the pump except diesel and it will run great. Mine has been on E15 almost exclusively since I bought it. E15 offers the best overall value for me on a cost per mile basis. And considering the mpg's I have been getting, it must be an alright choice.

Posted

Cowpie that's pretty outstanding mileage, my truck scaled at 7180 I see 13.8 on highway with no trailer and 10.8 with trailer attached. More power to you on your driving habits there very good. I guess my foot is a bit heavier. Might be that E15 i have never used it that might be the ticket.

Posted

Yes. 17-18 on road trips. It has a 14.5 mpg lifetime average for all miles... in town, rural, gravel roads, off road on property, etc. Everything. That is almost identical to the 2013 1500 5.3 I had before. Now, to be fair, driving style has as much to do with mpg as anything. Fleet studies have shown that driver operation accounts for 33% of mpg differences. I don't drive like some old retiree, but then I have no desire to floor it from light to light acting like the traffic lights are my own NHRA christmas tree starting lights, or do 85 down the freeway chasing every sports car around. I would fall into what some might call, a moderate driver. Carries over from my semi truck driving. And the 5.3L in the 1500 had 3.42 diffs whereas the 6.0L in the 2500 has 4.10 diffs.

 

You will almost always do better on mpg with the 1/2 ton. You are moving around 1000 lb less right out of the gate! My 2015 2500 6.0L 4.10 double cab, Z71, with snow plow prep package, comes in at 7380 lb with two people, full of fuel, and about 200 lb of tools in the back. If the 1/2 ton will meet your needs, that could be the better way to go. Rear end ratios will be the achilles heel. They just don't offer any good work ratios (at least for my needs and operation) in the 1500 unless you really pull out the stops and get the 6.2L with every other high brow package that includes the 3.73. While, the 2500 with the 6.0, 4.10 is virtually standard across the spectrum. There is a 3.73 version in the brochures, but I have not seen one on a lot. The other problem with something like the 6.2L in the 1/2 ton, is that you are stuck on premium fuel, at least as recommended by GM. Depending on price spreads in your area, the 6.2L in the 1/2 ton and the 6.0L in the 3/4 ton are a total equal when it comes to fuel costs per mile. And that is assuming the 6.2L gets about 3-4 mpg better than the 6.0L, which seems to be the average difference. At least the 6.0L, you can put just about any fuel in it at the pump except diesel and it will run great. Mine has been on E15 almost exclusively since I bought it. E15 offers the best overall value for me on a cost per mile basis. And considering the mpg's I have been getting, it must be an alright choice.

Thanks.....this is super helpful. I'll post what I get whatever I decide. Im just in the beginning stages now of deciding exactly what I want to do. In your note you mention the gears being the issue. I totally agree, but I'm pretty sure you can get the max tow package with 3.73 gears with the 5.3L according to the brochure. I'll double check, but for 2015 the max tow package has the 3.73 with the 5.3L and a 3.42 / 6.2L option.

Posted

That could be. I am not up to speed on every variation of all the pickups. From my experience, I made a huge mistake getting 3.42 in the 1500 I had.

 

Thing is, I have not seen a 3.42 that is worth a crap. But the OEM's across the spectrum are in a total love affair with it. Even in commercial semi trucks. It is such a lousy ratio in that mode if one is hauling anything heavy over more than flat ground. I cringed at first when I saw 3.42 in my 1500, but thought I might be ok in the smaller vehicle. Nope, I invented new swear words over it also. I wold not consider anything with less than 3.73, and I really am fond of the 4.10.

 

But like anything else, it is all dependent on the factors of what one uses the pickup for and where they operate it. The rural two lane, rolling hill, and gravel roads that are the primary area that my pickup operates, taller ratios like 3.42, and even worse, 3.08 are not very good choices. High speed freeway style driving on a regular basis, may be fine.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,962
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    contrabombarde
    Newest Member
    contrabombarde
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,355 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Still looks like a rivet to me in the pics, I don't see a nut and none of the pics show the head of the screw. But if you says so.....
    • Thanks for all the help so far!   I did try right from 2026 right down to 2021, and only from 2023 down lets me select the option for tire psi change, but I get the vehicle not supported error!   I'll definitely try it under Chevrolet after work today, and I'll get the sensor number from gm for my truck tire sensors. And I'll let you know if it works for me under Chevrolet!   And if that doesn't work, I'm going to guess that what @Atlas said about maybe I have a different body control module could be true!  
    • From where I'm sitting this sounds like a compatibility problem. I'm assuming the 2007 was a 900-series truck, and not an 800-series (they were sold side-by-side in dealerships that model year), since it starts and runs.   This is why I HATE post-2006 vehicles. Everything becomes a huge problem when you try to keep the thing running for longer than the manufacturer has designed it to.    I can't remember when Global-A architecture started - either '10 or '11. For your sake, you had better hope it's '11, or you're going to be spending some BIG money to correct this cluster-eff. That's something you need to find out before doing anything else. You may have several computers bricked ... but the fact that it runs tells me you MIGHT be ok here.     EDIT: Just did a quick refresher. You're screwed. This is Global-A. The 2 systems are NOT compatible in the slightest. Once you get the correct engine in there that IS compatible, you're going to need to see how many computers are locked. Absolute NIGHTMARE to straighten out, too. Your buddy might be better off cutting his losses and finding something else.   Welcome to post-2006 vehicle electronics. This is why I quit the industry, and drive nothing built after 1994. This stuff takes all the fun out of wrenching!  
    • Recently acquired new 2026 Silv. 1500 WT  - L3B + 4WD,  std cab + std bed, in (duh!) Sierra White. Upgrades: replaced 'steelies' w/  Vision "Flow" black alloys,  17x8.5"; HDX nerf bar w/steps (black powdercoat); Weatherguard large/deep alloy saddle toolbox; Michelin fitted bedmat (sale, perfect fit) Weathertech door sill guards TBD: rear wheebox liners 4x black fender arch trim - searching for best  (Putco: chrome only; not looking for flares either!) -Bill    
    • True, hard to say what differences there may or may not be between Chev and GM as well as a production year or mid year part change either.    I just found it odd that under the Sierra choice on the Autel that many of the last few years of production year did not include the choice of changing the tire pressure but if that is an Autel thing or a GM thing as to why the choices were not there. Knowing what tpms sensors are on the truck should give some guidance into which choices on the tool even make sense to try as I wouldn't give up just yet with the tool but I guess he will see what if anything he comes up with if he finds out a bit more info and tries a few more things on the Autel. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...