Jump to content

Are these bullets really "self-defense"?


tonyghkbve

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm a fan of 1911 .45s as well. If I had a 1911 .45 in hand with some IPSC Major loads in hard cast SWC, I'd have no reservations about what it will do in a self-defense situation. It wouldn't be a conscious choice, but I'd put more confidence in it than a 380 with HPs. I recall someone shooting a mid-sized deer with that IPSC SWC load...one shot kill...heart shot.

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

In reality .45 is not the all powerful round many think it is. 9mm, .40S&W, .45ACP all suck about the same.

 

Here's a dude who got shot 9 times with .45ACP Gold Dot and didn't stop until one went through his eye.

 

http://lawofficer.com/2009/06/17/officer-down-a-warriors-sacrifice/

Shot placement matters. Anyone that has decent big game hunting experience can tell you a well place shot in vital organs is necessary to kill quickly. No disrespect to officer Borders abilities.
Posted

Shot placement matters. Anyone that has decent big game hunting experience can tell you a well place shot in vital organs is necessary to kill quickly. No disrespect to officer Borders abilities.

 

 

Yep, it matters. There's nothing special about .45ACP in that regard.

Posted

True, there is nothing special about the .45. There is no perfect round that will fulfill every situation that can come up. There is nothing special about a 30-30 either, but it has dropped more game in N. America than any other cartridge. There are some things that just plain work. I base many of my cartridge choices on that premise. Hell, there have been people that took a wallop from a .50 BMG or a 20mm and still did not go down. You want guarantees, then launch a 105mm beehive round at them. Based on my personal experience, the .45 is a great choice. Not perfect, just great cartridge with a excellent, proven track record in a lot of situations. Of course, you hit them in the wrist or the big toe, you are not going to put them down.

Posted

I like .45ACP. Don't get me wrong. I have several 1911's and a couple .45 Glocks.

 

I just don't think with modern JHP ammo it makes that much difference what caliber you choose when considering your typical service pistols.

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • There you go again.  Preaching your politics and worse case scenarios.  And what are you doing to make the world less polarized? 
    • Maybe.   Maybe.   I don't want to be the one that needs help and can't get it when I need it. That is a legitimate complaint, and how they respond to those legitimate complaints is a big red flag to me.   I don't care how good the product is their conduct is subpar. Some people are fine supporting that for the sake of getting the product they want. I'm not.   To be fair, I haven't seen or touched their product in person to determine for myself the quality of it. I'm not offering any opinion on that either.
    • So if you do nothing and they act on their threats like death to America or Israel. And possibly a nuclear war. Whoever survives wonders why didn’t they listen? Or we do something like every President has said they can’t get a nuclear weapon. We’re at the 10 yard line and it happens the time is now or never. I think I’m ok with paying a little more for gas for awhile. It’s a shame that we now live in a world that’s so polarized. 
    • 4-5-6 fails due to design.  Not enough clutches and not enough piston to clutch surface area.  Also the backing plate can bow.     I'd say converter is two part.  The design of converter chosen, and factory tuning of it aka slipping it in D (also L6) for AFM purposes, as well as locking it up in 2nd gear, sometimes 1st, also it will partially lock up at light loads.  All because CAFE/fuel economy requirements.  A billet converter on the stock tune might hold up better, but would still be subject to the stock tuning and how its designed to lock or partially lock.     The most baffling part to me, is the 2007-2013 6L80s didn't have the failure rate the 2014-2018 ones do.  I've been where I work for almost 17 years now, and I recall maybe 3 or 4 of the 07-13 transmissions getting pulled for something.  14-18 on the other hand, it was at a minimum one a month being opened up.    If I had to guess, I'd say the tuning for the gen 5 engines/6L80 setup and its fuel economy goals had a good bit to do with it.  Also, it was bankruptcy time during these years, so I'm thinking some cost cutting was done for the launch of the K2XX trucks.  See also now the 10 speed valve body issues (more cost cutting).  They blow out some mesh screen in the spacer plate, undersized check ball, and the feed limit valve was aluminum and wears out prematurely.         I don't think it was the HP jump from the gen 4 to gen 5?  The 6.2 in the 07-13 trucks was good for 380-400hp during its life/states of tune, and the 5.3 did 310-320hp.   
    • All this might be worth it had we actually recovered enriched uranium, a WMD, or an actual nuclear deal with oversight. This is a flub of epic proportion, and they all know it.   $5.10 at a station reporting $4.99 last week. Here we go....
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...