Jump to content

Are these bullets really "self-defense"?


tonyghkbve

Recommended Posts

Posted

Grow up. Anyone who knows anything about shooting knows FMJ ammo is garbage for defense. It doesn't expand any, it dumps minimal energy into the target and it is more likely to over penetrate and hit a bystander.

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I'm went to a gun shop and bought these Winchester .45 ACP, 230 grain, ammo. They have that "personal protection" label on it, which makes me think they are made for the job. Usually, most hollow-point, self-defense rounds are usually in boxes of 20 rounds and sold at a price of $25 or more. These are 50 rounds and and cost close to about $36.00. Seems like a bang for the buck, eh gov'nah? LOL but anyway, can these bullets really protect or they good for target practice and I got ripped off? Tell me what you think..I can't post a pic for some reason but anway, they are the white Winchester box and the item number, if it really is it, is USA45JHP

You're better off to shoot 200 rounds of the white box and find that it functions 100% in your handgun, and then use it for self defense,

 

than you are buying the high dollar hp ammo and only running 20 rounds through your pistol because the ammo costs so much, and then using it for self defense.

Posted

ANY .45 round will do the job, it is a low velocity round, and for self defense, you would probably be @ 20 yards or less. I would not want to be on the wrong end of a .45

You should check out the "PerFecta" brand @ Wally World, you can purchase a box of 50 for $15.44, brass case, FMJ. It is manufactured in Italy and distributed by "Tulamo".

Very clean round.

 

This is a terrible post and totally incorrect. These people that for whatever reason believe a .45ACP is some magical caliber are delusional. Secondly, the ammo you listed is garbage range ammo., for practice and having fun. Is it not designed for self defense and should not be used that way.

.45ACP is just one of many calibers, there's nothing special about it. There are other calibers that work for self defense as well and with modern ballistics, perform extremely similar of better. The 9mm, .357Sig., and .40S&W are the most popular and have near identical ballistics using modern ammunition designed for self defense.

Posted

The only problem with your analogy is that the other calibers that you list a all hi velocity and unless you're using a hollow point round they will definitely go through you, I would take a 45 caliber over 357 any day of the week. I'm afraid sir that you do not know what you're talking about.

Posted

You're right, I'm clueless. I happen to forget that we live in the real world and not in a Nintendo game. FMJ rounds of a magical caliber work on video games, that means they have to work in the real world.

 

You're right, the rest of us are wrong and clueless, my mistake.

 

 

 

Sent from my crappy iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

When you say "the rest of us", does that mean you speak for everybody? I respect your opinion, and let's just end this by saying we agree to disagree you have your opinion and I have mine no harm no foul.

 

GOD bless you sir.

Posted

"The rest of us" refers to competent gun owners.

 

Get over it sir, I have.

Posted

While waiting for back ground check shopped around for 38+P ammo, Shop was very busy and not much help. First box was 38+P Critical Defense 115 grain put that back and bought 50rd box 129 Grain 38+P. Reading manual this morning it stated not use +P Ammo unless needed and not for practice. Remember now 10 years ago used .38 and +P for practice with 357 Mag. , need advise to return the 50 round box 38+P or keep it

Was up 02:30 and very tired when posted, had purchased .38 spl 130 gr. Fired several rounds at a Shooting Range last Tuesday and determined +P isn't needed. Been awhile since fired a pistol so after adjusting my grip and relaxing starting hitting on target ,also found out barrel and sights are just a blur with Bi Focals

Posted

I run 147 grain HST in both of my 9mm's I like Federal HST best. I have some standard pressure rounds that I run in my XDS and I wound up buying +p for my M&P 4.25 I would have gotten std pressure for m M&P but, I couldn't find 'em I the +p is very pleasant to shoot.

Great choice of ammunition, this is what I carry in all my 9mm's as well. According to tons of independent test it performs the best for 9mm self defense. The HST is also a stud in .40 and 45acp as well.

 

Ammo is no returnable. And +p is just a little more stress for the gun. Thats why they dont recommend shooting it all the time. My smith and wesson 642 says the same thing in the paper work

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

True/False statement, you have to be careful when it comes to +P. I say this because some manufacturers warn about using +P in their firearms and state it can cause excessive wear or even blow up the barrel. While other brands like H&K for example have absolutely no problem using +P and they actually do all their torture testing with +P rounds.

Posted

 

Well then sir, let's conduct an experiment, you stand still, and let me shoot you from 10 yards away with the PerFecta ammunition, and see if you live to tell about it (no disrespect intended).

I still believe that ANY .45 acp 230 grain bullet (target or not) will "Get er done".

Pretty much any subject matter expert in self defense would disagree with you. Yes ball ammo will probably do the job and if it was all I had I would make due but, over penetration alone would make me leery of using FMJ for self defense....

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

There are as many opinions on any given aspect of a defensive firearm and its ammunition as there are people who own them, maybe more.

 

Fortunately, most of it is just banter and overwhelming majority of armed people and their guns will never be tested on a bad guy.

 

My preference is stay mainstream opinion/empirical evidence on all aspects: make, model, sights, mods, and ammo type. If a person does that, it's hard to make a case he isn't well armed. I do prefer the middle or upper calibers and more penetration to minimal penetration. I don't know if I'll have an encounter with a 100 lb bad guy in a T-shirt or a 350 lb one with heavy clothing. Hopefully, nobody. But I'll prepare for the latter.

Posted

Oh how I love a good bullet argument! As a least a dozen of the guys have mentioned, white box Winchester is their economy brand. So, use it for practice.

 

When testing ammo for self defense you need to keep a few things in mind. First, have enough bullet for the job at hand and or your skill level. I know guys who have used 22 caliber handguns with good results. But most of us need at least a .380 or larger to get the same results. If you can't hit the broad side of a barn a .50 caliber handgun is not going to do you any good. Second, be aware of the muzzle flash at night on your choice of ammo and handgun. If you miss or the assailant is still coming after the first shot and your ammo produces a big muzzle flash, you are blinded for several seconds and that is not good news for you! Lastly, make sure your ammo does not over penetrate. Some examples of ball ammo, will drill a hole right thru somebody not causing much trauma. Then if you are really unlucky, it will hit somebody else and kill them! I have heard of cases where people shot their own family members thru walls as they are shooting at an intruder.

Posted

A little story about my direct experience with .22 long rifle penetration out of a semi-auto pistol. In 1979, a friend and I were hunting pronghorns in Wyoming. We had doe tags.

 

A friend shot a small, 70 lb ish goat, which dropped. Being young and inexperienced, he ran out a few hundred yards from the truck, leaving the rifle behind. I grabbed my Browning .22 pistol.

 

When he got within 25 yards, the goat stood up and faced him. I arrived with the pistol. He took the pistol and took several carefully aimed shots at the head. Nothing. I would have thought he was missing except for the goat flinching and the smack of the bullets. I took the pistol from my friend after 4-5 shots, knowing I was a better shot than he and we had no more ammo than what remained in the gun, unless we returned to the truck a few hundred yards away.

 

I shot the little goat 3 times, straight in the head before it dropped.

 

We opted to skin the head to see what had happened. Almost all the bullets were accounted for. All but one had failed to penetrate the very thin skull.

 

I've never given any thought to purposely having a .22 as a defensive gun.

Posted

I realize the people have their favorite bullets and loads, and with the plethora of choices available, it makes for some fun discussions on what would be best, but I learned real quick in the bush, that a 1911 with even government standard FMJ stuff does a wonderful job. Not fancy, not hi-tech, just plain got the job done. And I am not sure that a intruder breaking in the house is any more dangerous than a NVA soldier coming at you at almost handshaking distance in the dark with full intent on ending your existence on this planet. Sure, something that would expand to the size of a dinner plate would do more, but someone taking a .45 ball round in the chest gets knocked back pretty well. Probably not the best choice for thin walled homes, but anyone who thinks a hard ball round out of a .45 won't do the trick has no first hand experience. When the Army was getting ready to come out with the Beretta 9mm, I held on to my 1911. I still only have .45 as my pistol choice. Why give up on something that works? But I will readily admit, I have more than hard ball in my stash. Federal rounds that have a hard ball, conical look to them but have silicone under the nose that collapses and the jacket stars out is my favorite. Don't have to worry about clothing clogging up a big hollow point. The bullet is definitely going to expand.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have an old dental chair in my shop. Something I got for free and apparently it has more than scrap value? People collect them although mine isn't restored or anything. It's visually interesting (1930's Ritter) which is why I like it. And it IS decently comfortable if you kick back.   When a good buddy of mine saw it he said, let me guess, Atlas. It's a conversation piece? As in, you ask the questions, they do the talking?   Where do you hide the jar of teeth?   I would never.   
    • Are we talking about the same thing, though? The 7 versus 3 wear metals was from Lakespeed's 3.0-specific oil brand comparison test between AcDelco oil and Mobil ESP. The filter remains a constant so whatever excess particles the AcDelco oil is producing aren't being filtered out.   I'm assuming there's a parallel comparison to be made; IF the filter can filter down those particles, engine life increases, and your graph makes the case that a better filter (lower micron rating) can increase engine life. Introducing fewer particles AND filtering those particles with higher efficiency is the best of all worlds. Good oil, good filter.   Where we may disagree is the "baseline relative engine life". I'm more apt to believe the base engine life value is 200k+ on very average oil and filters, "bulk oil of unknown brand and white-label generic fleet-grade filter, Jiffy Lube"   Going from a 10 micron filter to a 5 micron filter should boost a base 200k to 275k in a vacuum as a single factor alone.   Here's the whatabout: How does regularly changing the oil and filter ahead of recommended schedule influence baseline engine life? Most people aren't going to science the heck out of this stuff or ask about Micron ratings, HTHS, or wear comparison tests at Jiffy Lube. Most of the Jiffy lube techs would say they need to call their tech support line to even try to get an answer.   --   Because we love anecdotes here, when I was fishing for 4.3 parts at a local yard this weekend, ALL of the 4.3 vehicles had well over 200k. I love looking at odometers of junked vehicles. How far did THIS go before landing at the crusher? The ones that still had engines weren't seized. None of them were vehicles I'd consider were Amsoil queens, in fact most of them had some kind of service cling-sticker in the corner of the windshield indicating it probably had very average maintenance services. Even the fresh parts rigs- I'm not sure taking an S/T series to 400k has much value considering the running value of those vehicles was probably somewhere around $1,000. 25+ years is a good run on time alone.   The intake manifold I salvaged had clean and bright pool areas. As expected, I found the fuel lines in the manifold rubbed through, just like mine. I'm guessing the lines on that donor truck started leaking, the truck started running rough, and its owner said that's enough I'm unwilling or can't take it out of service for several days, or spend $1000+ to repair it at a shop, it's simply time for a newer more reliable vehicle (or, more than likely, this is the 2nd, 3rd time this has happened in the truck's lifetime). While I don't count on my Blazer for reliability, the thought of giving it away for parts at certain points during my adventure, and being mentally free from its needs has has crossed my mind. I'd be losing $1500 or so, but I can only make more money; not time.
    • still $4.00 85 oct.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...