Jump to content

Are these bullets really "self-defense"?


tonyghkbve

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

That must be one big 45 ACP pistol. I have a P14-45 that is 15 rounds fully loaded and it is one BAP.

20 round 9mm pea shooter yes. :M16:

 

I would hardly call a 9mm as a pea shooter. Maybe a 22 or a 380 ACP, but not a 9mm. I have a 33 round mag for my Glock 19 that's for the Glock 18 which is the full auto full size 9mm. My Glock 19 has a decent kick for being a 9mm medium length barrel.

Posted

 

I would hardly call a 9mm as a pea shooter. Maybe a 22 or a 380 ACP, but not a 9mm. I have a 33 round mag for my Glock 19 that's for the Glock 18 which is the full auto full size 9mm. My Glock 19 has a decent kick for being a 9mm medium length barrel.

Just stirring. :jester: I do have some 9s, including a 380 ACP and 38 Super. The 38 Super is my favorite 9.

Posted

Just stirring. :jester: I do have some 9s, including a 380 ACP and 38 Super. The 38 Super is my favorite 9.

I like my XD. The 4.5" barrel is great.
Posted

That question is kinda like asking "Is this can of beer really for drinking?"

 

 

With that statement, it's obvious you are not familiar with different types of ammunition. Your comparison is absurd.

Posted

Caliber arguments are fun to watch...

 

The adequate caliber is the one you can most effectively stop the threat with (accurate HITS in the most vital areas, under extreme duress).

 

Many have fallen from the "pea-shooter" .22.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

147 hollow point in my off duty is what I like. Definitely shoots a bit different than the 115 grain range ammo.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

Posted

147 hollow point in my off duty is what I like. Definitely shoots a bit different than the 115 grain range ammo.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

I run 147 grain HST in both of my 9mm's I like Federal HST best. I have some standard pressure rounds that I run in my XDS and I wound up buying +p for my M&P 4.25 I would have gotten std pressure for m M&P but, I couldn't find 'em I the +p is very pleasant to shoot.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

While waiting for back ground check shopped around for 38+P ammo, Shop was very busy and not much help. First box was 38+P Critical Defense 115 grain put that back and bought 50rd box 129 Grain 38+P. Reading manual this morning it stated not use +P Ammo unless needed and not for practice. Remember now 10 years ago used .38 and +P for practice with 357 Mag. , need advise to return the 50 round box 38+P or keep it

Posted

Ammo is no returnable. And +p is just a little more stress for the gun. Thats why they dont recommend shooting it all the time. My smith and wesson 642 says the same thing in the paper work

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Posted

ANY .45 round will do the job, it is a low velocity round, and for self defense, you would probably be @ 20 yards or less. I would not want to be on the wrong end of a .45

You should check out the "PerFecta" brand @ Wally World, you can purchase a box of 50 for $15.44, brass case, FMJ. It is manufactured in Italy and distributed by "Tulamo".

Very clean round.

Posted

ANY .45 round will do the job, it is a low velocity round, and for self defense, you would probably be @ 20 yards or less. I would not want to be on the wrong end of a .45

You should check out the "PerFecta" brand @ Wally World, you can purchase a box of 50 for $15.44, brass case, FMJ. It is manufactured in Italy and distributed by "Tulamo".

Very clean round.

 

 

Hardly. If you're going to carry you want a proven JHP round, not some cheap unknown. The ammo you describe is fine for range use but that's all.

Posted

Hardly. If you're going to carry you want a proven JHP round, not some cheap unknown. The ammo you describe is fine for range use but that's all.

 

Well then sir, let's conduct an experiment, you stand still, and let me shoot you from 10 yards away with the PerFecta ammunition, and see if you live to tell about it (no disrespect intended).

I still believe that ANY .45 acp 230 grain bullet (target or not) will "Get er done".

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have an old dental chair in my shop. Something I got for free and apparently it has more than scrap value? People collect them although mine isn't restored or anything. It's visually interesting (1930's Ritter) which is why I like it. And it IS decently comfortable if you kick back.   When a good buddy of mine saw it he said, let me guess, Atlas. It's a conversation piece? As in, you ask the questions, they do the talking?   Where do you hide the jar of teeth?   I would never.   
    • Are we talking about the same thing, though? The 7 versus 3 wear metals was from Lakespeed's 3.0-specific oil brand comparison test between AcDelco oil and Mobil ESP. The filter remains a constant so whatever excess particles the AcDelco oil is producing aren't being filtered out.   I'm assuming there's a parallel comparison to be made; IF the filter can filter down those particles, engine life increases, and your graph makes the case that a better filter (lower micron rating) can increase engine life. Introducing fewer particles AND filtering those particles with higher efficiency is the best of all worlds. Good oil, good filter.   Where we may disagree is the "baseline relative engine life". I'm more apt to believe the base engine life value is 200k+ on very average oil and filters, "bulk oil of unknown brand and white-label generic fleet-grade filter, Jiffy Lube"   Going from a 10 micron filter to a 5 micron filter should boost a base 200k to 275k in a vacuum as a single factor alone.   Here's the whatabout: How does regularly changing the oil and filter ahead of recommended schedule influence baseline engine life? Most people aren't going to science the heck out of this stuff or ask about Micron ratings, HTHS, or wear comparison tests at Jiffy Lube. Most of the Jiffy lube techs would say they need to call their tech support line to even try to get an answer.   --   Because we love anecdotes here, when I was fishing for 4.3 parts at a local yard this weekend, ALL of the 4.3 vehicles had well over 200k. I love looking at odometers of junked vehicles. How far did THIS go before landing at the crusher? The ones that still had engines weren't seized. None of them were vehicles I'd consider were Amsoil queens, in fact most of them had some kind of service cling-sticker in the corner of the windshield indicating it probably had very average maintenance services. Even the fresh parts rigs- I'm not sure taking an S/T series to 400k has much value considering the running value of those vehicles was probably somewhere around $1,000. 25+ years is a good run on time alone.   The intake manifold I salvaged had clean and bright pool areas. As expected, I found the fuel lines in the manifold rubbed through, just like mine. I'm guessing the lines on that donor truck started leaking, the truck started running rough, and its owner said that's enough I'm unwilling or can't take it out of service for several days, or spend $1000+ to repair it at a shop, it's simply time for a newer more reliable vehicle (or, more than likely, this is the 2nd, 3rd time this has happened in the truck's lifetime). While I don't count on my Blazer for reliability, the thought of giving it away for parts at certain points during my adventure, and being mentally free from its needs has has crossed my mind. I'd be losing $1500 or so, but I can only make more money; not time.
    • still $4.00 85 oct.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...