Jump to content

2 Month Grade Card


Recommended Posts

Posted

 

What is standard on this truck? I searched tirerack for 255/70R17 (a guess) and the highest speed rating I found was T.

 

The cheapest Ts were $8 more than the cheapest Ss. I know GM negotiates quantity deals and such, so this is ballpark at best, but $8 over 500,000 trucks/yr works out to $4 million/yr. Speed limiting the trucks to save on tires certainly seems plausible.

2$ difference on onlinetires.com

 

http://www.onlinetires.com/user/vehicle/tires/all_brands/106.33/all_sizes/all_types/all_speeds/page_2.html

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

 

What is standard on this truck? I searched tirerack for 255/70R17 (a guess) and the highest speed rating I found was T.

 

The cheapest Ts were $8 more than the cheapest Ss. I know GM negotiates quantity deals and such, so this is ballpark at best, but $8 over 500,000 trucks/yr works out to $4 million/yr. Speed limiting the trucks to save on tires certainly seems plausible.

 

Option was the key term I had meant to emphasize. Its plausible I do agree. And at the same time the guy that drives around with a base standard truck is most likely not the guy trying to break the land speed record either. BTW my GM Performance Parts tires (Alenza H/L) start at H.

 

Saving who $8 per tire. GM? They are getting tires at cut rate from the manufacturer not from tire rack, so buying in bulk makes sense for GM and they will procure the most popular tire for cost savings of course, but also because its more abundant. Alot of those tires are not being sold on the lot because the dealer has so many ways to make it more appealing to the customer. The tires and wheels the truck was shipped with are not on the truck when it is sold on many occassions. I know for a fact my truck showed up at the dealer with wheels and tires that were returned to GM, not the dealership. The dealership changed the wheels and tires as per the options I ordered the truck with.

 

L

75 mph

120 km/h

Off-Road & Light Truck Tires

 

M

81 mph

130 km/h

Temporary Spare Tires

 

N

87 mph

140km/h

P

93 mph

150 km/h

Q

99 mph

160 km/h

Studless & Studdable Winter Tires

 

R

106 mph

170 km/h

H.D. Light Truck Tires

 

S

112 mph

180 km/h

Family Sedans & Vans

 

T

118 mph

190 km/h

Family Sedans & Vans

 

U

124 mph

200 km/h

H

130 mph

210 km/h

Sport Sedans & Coupes

 

V

149 mph

240 km/h

Sport Sedans, Coupes & Sports Cars

 

 

 

.....while you were on Tire Rack did you not see the same chart as me. Those same S rating tires are listed as per their chart for Family Sedans & Vans. Not trucks. So the assumption their would mean what? That everyone that recieves a truck from GM with S rated tires has tires on their vehicle that are not meant to be on there. Or that GM is purposely providing you with tires not meant to be on your vehicle in the first place. Man, those GM guys!

 

...My whole point in even addressing this is stop making assumptions for GM and why they do things, and why people like to drive fast! For the most part, those of us that do have hopefully done their homework.

Posted

Not that they can't be on a truck, they just cant support as heavy of a load. Pretty sure the bridgstones are P metric as well are they not? They should at least use an XL p metric in my opinion, but in all reality most people buying these trucks aren't going to haul much.

Posted

Not that they can't be on a truck, they just cant support as heavy of a load. Pretty sure the bridgstones are P metric as well are they not? They should at least use an XL p metric in my opinion, but in all reality most people buying these trucks aren't going to haul much.

 

 

That seriously wasnt a real question.

 

And you are getting what I am meaning by your statement "but in all reality most people buying these trucks aren't going to haul much".

 

.....but it sure comes in handy when those Zombies start coming over the ridge! (Yes I am kidding! No seriously!)

Posted

Saving who $8 per tire. GM?

 

Yes, exactly, saving GM. The "$8" was a quick number I gleaned from tirerack and have no idea what the real number is. My point is that any dollar amount multiplied by 1/2 million adds up quickly.

Posted

This seems to be incredibly hard for you to understand;

 

 

You cannot say this is not an assumption when you use the core word in your statement.

 

.........."My comment on why manufacturers limit top speed on certain vehicles is based on the assumption that they do not design a vehicle for that treshold the same way they don't design cars to have higher towing capabilities.".....

 

 

 

 

 

Manufacturers ≠ Truck Customer; do you not get this? Is this so hard for you to understand? GM has their reasons for limiting top speed. That is the point. They limit it and that is that. The fact that this is an important factor for you, as you have stated multiple times, is irrelevant to GM. And for the record because you seem to have this confused, top speed ≠ fast, because fast is subjective to each individual.

 

GM does not go out and advertise their pickup trucks at 150, 170mph. In no GM brochure, magazine review, or any other form of medium is a trucks top speed even discussed or brought up as a selling point. You know what is? Durability, pay load, towing capabilities, efficiency, etc. Top speed on trucks is not an important factor to GM. This along with many other reasons is why they have a top speed limiter.

 

 

 

Here you assume that every other member bought their truck for the same reason I did, and that I have not read your posts. I assure you I have read your posts.

 

 

.........."My statement, as its been from the beginning, is trying to explain why manufactures place speed governors on trucks"

 

 

I am not making assumptions as to why people buy their truck. People buy their vehicles for whatever reason they have. At no point do I say why other members buy their vehicles. I will highlight that below;

 

 

 

.........." I don't care why you purchased your truck, as that reason is a different reason than probably every other member here. I don't think you have been reading my posts at all. "

Here you assume that you know EXACTLY why there are limiters on the trucks

 

lol where am I making an assumption? I will break down that sentence for you here, maybe this is easier for you to understand;

 

"I dont care why you purchased your truck"

 

-I don't know how I can break this down any farther, you have your for buying your truck. I have mine. Everyone has theirs. They might or might not be the same.

 

"...as that reason is different reason than probably every other member here"

 

-Again, you buy your truck for whatever reason. I never said I knew why you bought your truck and I will say it again, I DON'T CARE WHY YOU BOUGHT YOUR TRUCK. Print that out if you need to, or write it on a post-it and put in on your monitor.

 

 

 

I don't know the exact reason there is a limiter, but I do know that you don't either.Period.

 

It doesn't take a genius to figure this out. What kind of bat-shit idea would if be if GM had a top speed limiter of 130mph with tires only rated at 112, or a drive-shaft only balanced to 105mph. They don't do this because all these little things add unnecessary production costs and every dollar counts to them. At the same time this is why items such as the OE tires, brakes, suspension, are perfectly capable of towing and hauling a payload as advertised.

 

Period.

Posted

What if they limit the speed in case some idiot gets some aftermarket floor mats stuck under his gas pedal and crashes like what happened to Toyota. Then GM would have to go around cutting the bottom of every trucks pedals off. In the case where your vehicle is speeding up and your not touching the gas having a lower speed limit will reduce the likelihood of a death if an accident occurs.

Posted

 

Yes, exactly, saving GM. The "$8" was a quick number I gleaned from tirerack and have no idea what the real number is. My point is that any dollar amount multiplied by 1/2 million adds up quickly.

Which the consumer pays for, not GM.

Posted

This seems to be incredibly hard for you to understand; Not hard to understand at all, I am just repeating what you are saying and pointing out the assumptions.

 

 

Manufacturers ≠ Truck Customer; do you not get this? Is this so hard for you to understand? GM has their reasons for limiting top speed. That is the point. They limit it and that is that. The fact that this is an important factor for you, as you have stated multiple times, is irrelevant to GM. And for the record because you seem to have this confused, top speed ≠ fast, because fast is subjective to each individual.

 

GM does not go out and advertise their pickup trucks at 150, 170mph. In no GM brochure, magazine review, or any other form of medium is a trucks top speed even discussed or brought up as a selling point. You know what is? Durability, pay load, towing capabilities, efficiency, etc. Top speed on trucks is not an important factor to GM. This along with many other reasons is why they have a top speed limiter. Nor do they advertise a Camper shell or Lift Kit or supercharger or should I keep going?

 

 

I am not making assumptions as to why people buy their truck. People buy their vehicles for whatever reason they have. At no point do I say why other members buy their vehicles. I will highlight that below;

 

 

lol where am I making an assumption? I will break down that sentence for you here, maybe this is easier for you to understand;

 

"I dont care why you purchased your truck" And I dont care why you bought your truck. Never even asked if it was in your top 20.

 

-I don't know how I can break this down any farther, you have your for buying your truck. I have mine. Everyone has theirs. They might or might not be the same.

 

"...as that reason is different reason than probably every other member here" - meaning every other person has a different reason from the original reason, so lets say 50% think one way and the other 50% can think every other way

 

-Again, you buy your truck for whatever reason. I never said I knew why you bought your truck and I will say it again, I DON'T CARE WHY YOU BOUGHT YOUR TRUCK. Print that out if you need to, or write it on a post-it and put in on your monitor. And I dont care why you bought your truck. Never even asked if it was in your top 20.

 

 

 

It doesn't take a genius to figure this out. What kind of bat-shit idea would if be if GM had a top speed limiter of 130mph with tires only rated at 112, or a drive-shaft only balanced to 105mph. They don't do this because all these little things add unnecessary production costs and every dollar counts to them. At the same time this is why items such as the OE tires, brakes, suspension, are perfectly capable of towing and hauling a payload as advertised.

 

Dont need a printer, I have no reason to argue or care about anythinig other than the fact your trying to speak as to you are the be all end all defacto knowledge bank as to why GM does what they do. Just so you know, companies regulate the specs by large percentages due to regulations placed on them. A speed of 130 mph on an S rated tire is not a smart thing to do, but I would be safe to bet that you can do it, and it has been done. Balanced to the 105mph, not top speed. Brakes, Suspension, and driveline components are capable of alot more than you give them credit for. If it can tow 5000 lbs at highway speed it is more than capable of doing more than the limiter limits it at. Using your same thought process of liability, why would a tuner allow you to do it if they had any "bat-shit-idea" that it was detrimental to the vehicle. My thought on this is that you will hit the wall of max power before you hit the wall of max tolerance of components. Buick Grand National comes to mind limited to 122mph because of transmission. When the transmission could really handle a heck of alot more.

 

I stated before, I do not know the EXACT reason for GM putting a limiter on their products, and NEITHER do you.

 

 

Period.

 

 

Hennessey HPE650 Supercharged Upgrade

Power:

• 650 bhp @ 5,500 rpm

• 658 lb-ft Torque @ 4,200 rpm

HPE650 Supercharged Upgrade Includes:

• 2.9 Liter Supercharger System

• High Flow Intercooling System

• Stainless Stell Catback Exhaust System

• HPE Engine Management Calibration

• All Necessary Gaskets, Fluids & Hardware

• Professional Installation

• Dyno Tuning & Road Testing

• Serial-Numbered Dash Plaque

• Serial-Numbered Engine Plaque

• Hennessey Exterior Badging

• HPE650 Exterior Badging

• Supercharged Badging

• Hennessey Embroidered Headrests

• 3 Year / 36,000 Mile Limited Warranty

....Nowhere to be found driveshaft or trans or suspension upgrades because stock wasnt enough already....and your out of your Fing mind if you think they reached those numbers with a 100mph limiter in testing.

 

 

 

Period.

 

 

Posted

 

This seems to be incredibly hard for you to understand; Not hard to understand at all, I am just repeating what you are saying and pointing out the assumptions.

 

 

Manufacturers ≠ Truck Customer; do you not get this? Is this so hard for you to understand? GM has their reasons for limiting top speed. That is the point. They limit it and that is that. The fact that this is an important factor for you, as you have stated multiple times, is irrelevant to GM. And for the record because you seem to have this confused, top speed ≠ fast, because fast is subjective to each individual.

 

GM does not go out and advertise their pickup trucks at 150, 170mph. In no GM brochure, magazine review, or any other form of medium is a trucks top speed even discussed or brought up as a selling point. You know what is? Durability, pay load, towing capabilities, efficiency, etc. Top speed on trucks is not an important factor to GM. This along with many other reasons is why they have a top speed limiter. Nor do they advertise a Camper shell or Lift Kit or supercharger or should I keep going?

 

-Holy hell, are you this dense? Aftermarket products? How the hell did we end up there?

 

I am not making assumptions as to why people buy their truck. People buy their vehicles for whatever reason they have. At no point do I say why other members buy their vehicles. I will highlight that below;

 

 

lol where am I making an assumption? I will break down that sentence for you here, maybe this is easier for you to understand;

 

"I dont care why you purchased your truck" And I dont care why you bought your truck. Never even asked if it was in your top 20.

 

-Good, I think you forgot to address the point to which you claimed I was assuming all these things though.

 

-I don't know how I can break this down any farther, you have your for buying your truck. I have mine. Everyone has theirs. They might or might not be the same.

 

"...as that reason is different reason than probably every other member here" - meaning every other person has a different reason from the original reason, so lets say 50% think one way and the other 50% can think every other way

 

-Again ok? Not sure where you are going with this.

 

-Again, you buy your truck for whatever reason. I never said I knew why you bought your truck and I will say it again, I DON'T CARE WHY YOU BOUGHT YOUR TRUCK. Print that out if you need to, or write it on a post-it and put in on your monitor. And I dont care why you bought your truck. Never even asked if it was in your top 20.

 

-Great, we don't care about each other. Got it

 

 

It doesn't take a genius to figure this out. What kind of bat-shit idea would if be if GM had a top speed limiter of 130mph with tires only rated at 112, or a drive-shaft only balanced to 105mph. They don't do this because all these little things add unnecessary production costs and every dollar counts to them. At the same time this is why items such as the OE tires, brakes, suspension, are perfectly capable of towing and hauling a payload as advertised.

 

Dont need a printer, I have no reason to argue or care about anythinig other than the fact your trying to speak as to you are the be all end all defacto knowledge bank as to why GM does what they do.

 

-I'm sorry if you feel as I'm talking down to you. That seems to be a you problem.

 

Just so you know, companies regulate the specs by large percentages due to regulations placed on them. A speed of 130 mph on an S rated tire is not a smart thing to do, but I would be safe to bet that you can do it, and it has been done. Balanced to the 105mph, not top speed. Brakes, Suspension, and driveline components are capable of alot more than you give them credit for.

 

-Again, no one is saying tires will magically disintegrate if you go past their rated speed limit. I've done it and so have many others. See post here. This doesn't change the fact that the OE tires are rated at 112mph. Its like hauling more than what your tires are rated for, can you do it? Yes, its probably past its intended payload but most likely you will be fine. However when you do and something fails the liability of part failure is transferred from the manufacturer to you.

 

If it can tow 5000 lbs at highway speed it is more than capable of doing more than the limiter limits it at. Using your same thought process of liability, why would a tuner allow you to do it if they had any "bat-shit-idea" that it was detrimental to the vehicle.

 

-A aftermarket tuner does not carry the same liability of failure as a manufacturer does, if they did they would warranty any engine failure caused by a tune. And we know no-one does this because aftermarket tunning has its own inherit risk of mechanical failure.

 

My thought on this is that you will hit the wall of max power before you hit the wall of max tolerance of components.

 

-Yes, I agree with this, but at this point you have transferred part failure from the manufacturer to you. The only difference between this and overloading is this is something GM can control, they have no way of being able to limit your payload.

 

I stated before, I do not know the EXACT reason for GM putting a limiter on their products, and NEITHER do you.

 

-See above

Hennessey HPE650 Supercharged Upgrade

Power:

• 650 bhp @ 5,500 rpm

• 658 lb-ft Torque @ 4,200 rpm

HPE650 Supercharged Upgrade Includes:

• 2.9 Liter Supercharger System

• High Flow Intercooling System

• Stainless Stell Catback Exhaust System

• HPE Engine Management Calibration

• All Necessary Gaskets, Fluids & Hardware

• Professional Installation

• Dyno Tuning & Road Testing

• Serial-Numbered Dash Plaque

• Serial-Numbered Engine Plaque

• Hennessey Exterior Badging

• HPE650 Exterior Badging

• Supercharged Badging

• Hennessey Embroidered Headrests

• 3 Year / 36,000 Mile Limited Warranty

....Nowhere to be found driveshaft or trans or suspension upgrades because stock wasnt enough already....and your out of your Fing mind if you think they reached those numbers with a 100mph limiter in testing.

Period.

-OMG YOU SHOULD TOTALLY SEND THIS TO GM AND BE LIKE LOOK GUYS. THERE IS NO REASON FOR A TOP SPEED LIMITER. CAN YOU REMOVE IT PLZ. XOXOXOXO - STRYKER

Period.

Period.

-Period

 

Posted

Which the consumer pays for, not GM.

 

So no sense in GM managing cost?

 

Unless GM can charge $8 or more per truck, on average, due to the higher speed-rated tire (or sell more trucks), it makes sense for them to ship with the cheaper tire and pocket the difference. (Again, just using "$8" as a made-up example.)

Posted

WendysOrBust

 

For your information on OE tires. My Tires on my truck right now are OE GM Tires and are rated 130mph and include a GMPP part number.

 

You stated: -Yes, I agree with this, but at this point you have transferred part failure from the manufacturer to you. The only difference between this and overloading is this is something GM can control, they have no way of being able to limit your payload.

 

WRONG. Anything over the posted DOT speed limits liability is you. Thats the point I have been trying to convey to you this entire time. The manufacturers hands are clean once you break the tolerance of the law. Regulations are why safety is imposed for the most part. If GM worrying if the part is going to fail at 101 mph, chances are the part is going to also fail via torque required to pull 5000 lbs. I agreed that tires could play a role in that, but as per the video I posted, those tires on that Hennessey from what I could tell are Goodyear SRA's.

Posted

I wonder how OP feels about this thread...

Too Funny!

 

 

Posted

 

So no sense in GM managing cost?

 

Unless GM can charge $8 or more per truck, on average, due to the higher speed-rated tire (or sell more trucks), it makes sense for them to ship with the cheaper tire and pocket the difference. (Again, just using "$8" as a made-up example.)

 

True. But that S rated tire has its benefit since its most likely in higher quantities. Speculation.

 

...and I stand corrected on the Buick Grand National. The limiter was not for the transmission, it was for front end lift at 125mph and its loss of stability beyond that.

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,924
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    KirbyCo
    Newest Member
    KirbyCo
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,442 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I will be doing that for sure, but I need to solve who has/ where I can find a bidirectional scan tool that will support OBD 1.5. I'm kicking myself because I ebay'ed a Snap On MT2500 that I didn't think I'd ever need anymore. D'oh!! I'd rather not buy another, so I'll contact a few local shops to see if they have one and how much they'd want to do the procedure. I'd rather have the ability to do it myself... I wish there was a modern tool that could do it all, but I'd have no idea what to buy.   The theory with the pulled timing is that it mimics a rich condition. The delayed spark causes incomplete burn and the O2 sensor picks up low oxygen levels. That's interpreted as a rich condition so the PCM pulls fuel and that shows up in the deeply negative fuel trims.
    • An ultra wealthy man had the most beautiful daughter. But, there was a problem. Everything she touched would melt in her hands. No matter what, Metal, Wood, Stone. Anything she touched would melt. She could not feed herself. Because of this, men were afraid of her. Nobody would dare marry her. Her father was despaired. What could he do to help his daughter? He consulted doctors, scientists and anybody who could solve this problem. Finally one of them said, "If your daughter touches one thing that does not melt in her hands, she will be cured." He was overjoyed and came up with a plan. The next day, he held a competition. Any man who could bring his daughter an object that would not melt in her hands would be given billions of dollars to marry her. Three extremely intelligent and handsome young men took up the challenge. The first brought a very heavy steel rod, But alas, when the she touched it, it completely melted in a matter of seconds. He sadly went away. The second brought a beautiful diamond, knowing diamonds were one of the hardest substance in the world and would not melt. But alas, once she held it in her hand, it melted. He too was sent away disappointed. So now, there was one left He was very nervous & sweating. He approached the daughter & said, “put your hand in my pants pocket and feel what is in there." She did exactly what he asked. She felt something very hard. She held it in her hand, squeezing it as hard as she could. It did not melt & remained extremely hard. Her father was overjoyed. Everybody was overjoyed. She was finally cured. Nothing never, ever melted in her hand again. They married and they both lived happily ever after, raising a wonderful family. Question: What was in the the groom’s pants pocket??? Answer below ↓ M&Ms of course! They melt in your mouth, not in your hand. What on earth were you thinking?
    • There's a bunch of tea leaves that you've read, but in any case the delayed timing is unusual. Not sure how that relates to the rich at idle vs. 'normal' while driving.   If you're in this deep, might be worth investigating, and re-learning the sensor. What have you got to lose? Plus, it properly fixes the timing cover leak.
    • The only problem I have seen this cause is longer crank times. 
    • Injector is being sent off today for rebuild and I estimate I'll have it back in 10 days or so.   It may not be the injector...of course...now that I've torn down the intake again. But, let's rule out the injector and replace those spider legs that have been almost rubbed through.   The truck has always had negative timing and I'm reading "normal" timing at warm idle should be +16 or so. I'm negative 16 to 25 or more, and it's always been like that since I bought it.   A light turned on upstairs last night in the old noggin. Rare, I know...   This will be wild, if it turns out to be the cause!   In 2001, according to the old service documentation, the muffler was replaced. Why? I have no idea, it wouldn't have been rusted through by then. But they did a crappy job.   In 2019, another shop replaced it and noted the prior install was poorly done on the work order. "Exhaust system vibrates on crossmember". Except...I guess they just left it be? I believe the husband, the couple who were original owners, had passed by then. Maybe she said it's just not worth it to have the exhaust system fixed and declined repairs. Very few miles were driven between 2019 and 2025.   The exhaust system vibrates heavily on the crossmember and you can feel it and REALLY hear it, even today. Not always, but at idle, it gets going pretty good sometimes.   What if....   ....What if that's enough to trigger one or both of the knock sensors? Could it be tricking the sensors into sensing knock, so it's pulling timing aggressively? Pulling timing heavily means it's firing after the piston reaches full height which means incomplete burn which means the O2 sensor is sensing a rich condition, which means I've been chasing my tail, and what I thought was an inconsequential problem (janky exhaust) has been THE issue for this truck for 25 solid years?   That would be wild. Maybe it IS wild.   The service documentation thereafter, for years, shows visits for rough idle, replacing O2's, replacing the cat, replacing plugs and wires, a misfire condition, like they could never solve the issue. The injector has been replaced 4 times in 80k miles, that's just crazy.   The secondary theory....   The engine has clearly had a leak at the front seal for a very long time (the greasy trench...). I think the truck changed hands quickly ~2025 because there's Napa receipts from someone I don't recognize in the ownership history. They apparently replaced the timing cover seal, and they did a terrible job. There's RTV smeared all over and the leak I had reduced to a weep by snugging the front oil pan bolts is now a leak again.   HOWEVER....I read about replacing the crankshaft position sensor. Any time the ckp sensor is disturbed or timing cover is removed, the truck requires relearning, and that can only be done through a bi-directional scan tool. Skippy with the RTV probably didn't do the relearn procedure is my guess. His scan tool is lost in a pile of RTV goo somewhere.   So, it's very possible the sensor has been disturbed and the truck is just running on the old learn data but not setting a code for anything. The distributor has since been replaced and so has the camshaft position sensor, so all bets are off for that thing.   In the theme of one step forward, two steps back, I returned the accumulator for the AC. The gal I've been working with at O'Really's has been great. She refunded it under manufacturer's defect and we compared it to the replacement I ordered, and sure enough, the replacement is machined very differently (and a gauge actually fits on it!).   Got it home, installed it, started vacuuming it down.... and I couldn't get good vacuum.   The high side service port, where I replaced the old GM ball valve suspecting that was a source of the previous leak....well, I've clearly exposed whatever pre-existing crack in the line where the service port is welded, and made it much worse. Blessing in disguise? Except there goes another $25, now I'm waiting for a replacement AC line.   In 10-ish days ALL the parts will be here. Rebuilt injector, new exhaust system, new cat, new high pressure AC line.   Oh, did I mention the squeaking ISN'T coming from the AC pump? The truck still squeaks when started, and there were words after I started it with the new AC pump installed. But, there was more to replacing the AC pump for just a squeak. A truck with good working AC is something of value, for the comfort alone.   I've ordered a new harmonic balancer because, 30 years is a good run for one of those. Rule it out. The squeak may be something more sinister, though. I'm worried about that ckp sensor and if it was shimmed correctly, or if the timing set was installed correctly. The squeak may be coming from UNDER the timing cover.   At this point, once I get it put back together, I'm thinking I'll take a 50 mile victory lap and then promptly put it up for sale. This truck is cursed. Betty, from beyond the grave, doesn't want anyone messing with her Blazer. Or maybe she's getting revenge for 30 years of shop visits with that thing.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...