Jump to content

Rated RPM


nht mike

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone know at what RPM that torque peak and horsepower are rated for the new 6.2?

 

Thanks

Posted

Engines
Model Year Engine Power Torque
1500
2007-2013 4.3 L Vortec 4300 V6 195 hp (145 kW) @ 4600 RPM 260 lb·ft (353 N·m) @ 2800 RPM

2007-2008 4.8 L Vortec 4800 V8 295 hp (220 kW) @ 5600 RPM 305 lb·ft (414 N·m) @ 4800 RPM

2009 295 hp (220 kW) @ 5600 RPM 305 lb·ft (414 N·m) @ 4600 RPM

2010-2013 302 hp (225 kW) @ 5600 RPM 305 lb·ft (414 N·m) @ 4600 RPM

2007-2009 5.3 L Vortec 5300 V8 315 hp (235 kW) @ 5200 RPM 338 lb·ft (458 N·m) @ 4400 RPM

2010-2013 315 hp (235 kW) @ 5300 RPM 335 lb·ft (454 N·m) @ 4400 RPM

2007-2008 6.0 L Vortec 6000 V8 367 hp (274 kW) @ 5500 RPM 375 lb·ft (508 N·m) @ 4300 RPM

2009 367 hp (274 kW) @ 5600 RPM 375 lb·ft (508 N·m) @ 4300 RPM

2009-2013 6.2 L Vortec 6200 V8 403 hp (301 kW) @ 5700 RPM 417 lb·ft (565 N·m) @ 4300 RPM


2500HD/3500HD
2007-2008
6.0 L Vortec 6000 V8
353 hp (263 kW) @ 5400 RPM 373 lb·ft (506 N·m) @ 4400 RPM

2009-2013 360 hp (268 kW) @ 5400 RPM 380 lb·ft (515 N·m) @ 4200 RPM

2007-2010 6.6 L DuraMAX V8 365 hp (272 kW) @ 3200 RPM 660 lb·ft (895 N·m) @ 1600 RPM

2011-2013 397 hp (296 kW) @ 3000 RPM 765 lb·ft (1,037 N·m) @ 1600 RPM

Silverado XFE 2009
6.0 L Vortec 6000 V8
332 hp (248 kW) @ 5100 RPM 367 lb·ft (498 N·m) @ 4100 RPM
Silverado Hybrid 2009-2013

 

 

 

 

 

Don't know if this is of any value to you or not.

Posted

Thanks! Because the new trucks are so much quieter it's hard to do a "seat of the pants" comparison, but my neighbors '15 Denali 6.2, 3.42, 20" tire doesn't seem to run any better (if as well) as my 6.2, short tire 3.73.

 

Mike

Posted

Thanks! Because the new trucks are so much quieter it's hard to do a "seat of the pants" comparison, but my neighbors '15 Denali 6.2, 3.42, 20" tire doesn't seem to run any better (if as well) as my 6.2, short tire 3.73.

 

Mike

 

Your neighbors truck has the 8 speed doesn't it? Tire diameter will be pretty close to being the same as yours, assuming you are running a stock tire size. I think the stock diameter of most OE tire/wheel combinations on the Sierra is about 31-32 inches. Final drive difference is under 10% difference. The real difference you may be feeling is the difference between a new engine and a broken in engine. Until broken in the new engines have always felt slow to me. They seem to get more powerful after 5k have been put on them.

Did your truck come with the pitiful 245-70-17 tires? They were the shortest tire available I think. It should have had the 265-70-17 tires though I think, especially with the max trailer option.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...