Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

After tons of forum stalking I finally pulled the trigger. Here's my 2017 All Terrain with a Zone 4.5" lift on 35x12.5r20 Cooper STT Pro tires and powder coated OEM All Terrain wheels. I can confirm there is no rubbing and no trimming was required (only had to remove the front lower valance)

 

Y5nd2.jpg

zK9Ey.jpg

RN9fh.jpg

RN9fh.jpg

Did you have to use spacers?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

looks good to me. I too had to hold off on a lift and wheels. love the idea of lift/wheels but wallet said no along with my girlfriendLOL

Just put a set of the wildpeak son my Denali, they are a great looking tire.

Posted

What did powder coating run ya?

I paid $150 a wheel. Basic colors like flat black are about $75. The color I chose is called crystal metallic and it has a great metallic dark grey look to it

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Did you have to use spacers?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No spacers. The front wheels stick out I’d say about 3/4” and the rears are basically flush. The difference didn’t bother me enough to use spacers on the rear for looks alone.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

c3695bc3c72d9fe4715ad8fd60f6bdc4.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

This is from a local shop in GA. I plan on taking my 2014 SLT  in after it gets out of body shop. It got broken into at the airport while on a business trip. 

Price is good but trying to decide on TIres. Leaning towards the Toyo Open Country R/T. My Nitto All-terrains have been good but want something more aggressive and not so stiff. The Toyo's have an E rating for 35x12.5's 

 

Lifted truck.png

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

Here is mine with stock 22’s and 35 inch toyo  open country mt

406C8C53-6B7E-4076-B04F-D9257492E784.jpeg

Edited by Husek302
  • Like 3
Posted
On 10/24/2017 at 8:18 PM, RHStansbury said:

Details on the lift/level and tires, please.

I was curious about the specs too b/c this is the look I want...  I found what he posted in the leveling thread on it...

 

 

Posted

RHstansbury & Chuckleberry thanks! I'm running the Rough Country 2.5IN GM LEVELING LIFT KIT (07-18 1500 PU) comes with 2.5" up front and 1" of lift blocks over the factory. Seems to me like I'm sitting a bit nose high though. So I bought the 3" blocks and you need to buy the longer UBOLTS 9/16 to make it work. I didnt do any trimming at all! Thought I was going to have to cut some of the inner liner out but I can even run my mudflaps so pretty happy about that. Keep the rocks down.

Posted
7 hours ago, Chuckleberry said:

I was curious about the specs too b/c this is the look I want...  I found what he posted in the leveling thread on it...

 

 

RHstansbury & Chuckleberry thanks! I'm running the Rough Country 2.5IN GM LEVELING LIFT KIT (07-18 1500 PU) comes with 2.5" up front and 1" of lift blocks over the factory. Seems to me like I'm sitting a bit nose high though. So I bought the 3" blocks and you need to buy the longer UBOLTS 9/16 to make it work. I didnt do any trimming at all! Thought I was going to have to cut some of the inner liner out but I can even run my mudflaps so pretty happy about that. Keep the rocks down.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...