Jump to content

Disappointed in the 6.2


Recommended Posts

Posted

When I bought my '14 LTZ in the fall of '13 the 6.2 wasn't available yet. I got a Flex Fuel capable 5.3 and run E85. I keep reading that the 5.3 is sluggish and the 6.2 is a beast. Today I decided to go shopping and maybe get a 6.2 and 8 speed truck. I drove an LTZ Crew Cab 4WD Short box. Beautiful truck. When I got on the throttle on a very long freeway entrance it didn't jump, but pulled slowly up to speed. I know I'm going to get a lot of flak for saying this, but honestly my 5.3 on E85 would have walked away from this truck. Maybe it was just this particular truck, maybe it was the 8 speed, or possibly it just needed to be broken in, but that truck was no "beast." I don't know what octane the fuel was, so that could have some bearing. I was happy to go home in my '14. I gained a new respect for that truck. I guess I'll just keep my trusty '14. It's been trouble free, is comfortable and quiet, and gets on to the freeway quickly and smoothly.

 

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

What were the axle ratios of the trucks? Makes a huge difference. A tune makes all the difference. The stock transmission tuning is what makes the 5.3 seem like a dog.

Posted

My 5.3 has the 3.42:1, the 6.2 8 speed had the 3.23:1. My tranny seems to have improved when I started running E85. My 5.3 on E85 is no dog considering it's weight. I kick it, it roars and goes. I expected a lot more from the 6.2 truck considering the 8 speed has a lower first gear and I assume, closer ratios,. I stomped it to the floor and it didn't pull hard while in what I thought was second gear. It wasn't about shifting slowly or sloppily. The engine just didn't have much while in the same gear. Maybe it was in too high a gear. I know a tune can help immensely, but my 5.3 isn't tuned and it pulls noticeably harder than that particular 6.2 untuned truck. I really don't want to tune a new truck and have warranty problems. I thought the 6.2 should be plenty stock. Whatever, I'm happy with the performance of my little 5.3 6 speed.on E 85. That was a very nice truck with the 6.2, the performance just disappointed me.

Posted

To be honest, I feel the same way about my 6.2. I'm saving up for a tune because I hear it's a night and day difference but I shouldn't have to...

Posted

Wow I am not sure what the difference is with these other 6.2L, I come from a world of speed, BMW HP4 motorcycles ($35,000 9 second quarter mile) BMW M3 with 530 HP, Cadillac CTS V and a Ferrari 360 Modena. I decided to get my first truck and drove the 5.3 denali and was very underwelmed, but when I hopped in the 6.2L wowwwwww. I was doing 75 MPH and floored it to pass someone and the back end broke loose, I couldn't believe how good this thing pulled. I had them order me a black on black one and never looked back. The only thing I can maybe think of is that there feels like a false bottom if you floor it, once you hit the second stage of flooring it is when it really downshift and takes off like a bat out of hell. I was spinning tires with 4 250 lbs plus passengers in the thing, everyone that has ridden with me has been amazed at the power and speed so far.

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted

Wow I am not sure what the difference is with these other 6.2L, I come from a world of speed, BMW HP4 motorcycles ($35,000 9 second quarter mile) BMW M3 with 530 HP, Cadillac CTS V and a Ferrari 360 Modena. I decided to get my first truck and drove the 5.3 denali and was very underwelmed, but when I hopped in the 6.2L wowwwwww. I was doing 75 MPH and floored it to pass someone and the back end broke loose, I couldn't believe how good this thing pulled. I had them order me a black on black one and never looked back. The only thing I can maybe think of is that there feels like a false bottom if you floor it, once you hit the second stage of flooring it is when it really downshift and takes off like a bat out of hell. I was spinning tires with 4 250 lbs plus passengers in the thing, everyone that has ridden with me has been amazed at the power and speed so far.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

I wasn't there so I can't say yes this is all correct.. but ummm I have the same motor and ummm well unless the road was wet. Or you were on ice there is no way. Going 75 really and flooring it. Unless I see a video of that on a stock 6.2 I'm calling b.s.
Posted

^^ I don't see the rear end breaking loose at 75 in a truck. My 5.3 and 3.42's only breaks em loose from a stand still or around corners

Posted

I have the 3.23 (is that right?) Rear end and everytime I floor it I can feel the traction control kick in after a little rear end give. The 420 HP it is putting down feel awesome.

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted

I have the 3.23 (is that right?) Rear end and everytime I floor it I can feel the traction control kick in after a little rear end give. The 420 HP it is putting down feel awesome.

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

3.23 comes in the 8 speeds, 3.42's and 3.08's come in the 6 speeds
Posted

I test drove both, no comparison. I didnt want to spend the extra $$$ for the 6.2, the test drive made me.Something wrong with the one you drove.

 

Mike

Posted

Thanks for the comments. The tires breaking loose is another thing that amazed ne. I made a sharp right turn to get on the freeway ramp so I was going maybe 10 m.p.h. when I stomped the 6.2. No false bottom on the throttle. The truck just smoothly accelerated less than impressively, the tires were quiet. When I left the dealership I made a left onto a 4 lane so I was going a bit faster when I straightened out and stomped my 5.3 running E 85. The tires broke loose and it set me back into the seat. This is in Golden, Colorado at around 5500 ft. altitude. I have no reason to embellish the story. I wanted the biggest baddest motor and that's what the 6.2 is supposed to be. Maybe that 8 speed didn't downshift to first gear when I hit the throttle. I didn't watch the tach as I was expecting all hell to break loose.

 

My 5.3 is really plenty of power, and although if I bought a new truck I still would get the 6.2. I don't want to get a tune for warranty reasons and stock the 6.2 should be impressive. My little 5.3 became more fun to drive when I added E85 and it's not tuned. I just expected more from the 6.2.

Posted

I drove several '14 and '15 5.3's and was very under whelmed. Had to really get in the pedal on all of them to get it to move. The 6.2 is a beast but the transmission tuning is ultra conservative. Even at that the truck moves out with much less pedal and much less effort than the 5.3. It is true in the 6.2 the pedal has like a second stage throttle input. I didn't realize til I read this on an escalade forum. You essentially think it's floored but push a little harder and you get what you are looking for. I'm not dogging the 5.3 because once the pedal is down it moves out good. To be honest neither has close to as good feeling throttle input as my '12 ecoboost with 3.55's.

Posted

I recently drove an NHT equipped ( so 3.42 geared) 8 speed 6.2. I didn't get on the throttle hard off the bottom but put my foot into it at around 55 mph. It pulled very hard accelerating but was very slow to downshift....... which with stock tuning and being brand new I expect. Not overwhelming and feels no faster than any other truck I drive. I am looking at a 3.23 geared one now but I want to drive it first. I am used to trucks with ratings of over 400 HP so it didn't feel slow particularily to me.

Posted

Just another thing I have felt with the 6.2 and ecoboost. Neither downshifted as often to when pressing the pedal to accelerate. They both made the needed power in the gear they were in, so no need to downshift. On a different note maybe the conservative tranny is why I get 17 in town and 22 @70 with ko2's.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 353 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...