Jump to content

the wonderful brake issues.....


Dirtautoguy

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 1996 chevy k1500 with the 350 vortec. My problem is the brakes. it has a new master cylinder, drums, hardware, shoes, wheel cylinders, rotors, pads, calipers, and some new lines. no matter how much I bleed it I cannot get a hard pedal. I understand these trucks dont have very good brakes to start with but I have driven several other GMT 400 trucks and the brakes were tons better than mine. I have checked that the drums were adjusted out as well.

 

I read this forum and tried it

 

http://advrider.com/index.php?threads/97-gmc-1500-with-spongy-as-hell-brakes-fixed.919964/

 

and I did get some pretty nasty fluid out as well as some air but it didnt seem to help the pedal much.

 

I took it to a shop with a tech 2 scanner to see if maybe I had air in the ABS and they said that their scanner would start the test however something wouldnt alow it to do the whole test and they didnt know why. they said they tried it 3 times and it would not do it, however the pedal does feel better than it did.

 

any ideas?? I have been reading alot but not finding many answers. I did find two more things with rubber caps on them under the proportioning valve anyone know what they are?? could it be my proportioning valve?? they fronts seem to grab pretty good and the drum brakes dont seem to be grabbing like they should. with the truck off the brakes are rock solid and the pedal wont bleed down. but soon as I start the truck the pedal goes way down. I have about 3-4 inches before the brakes start to grab and about 5-6 inches untill they are grabbing better. If I slam on the brakes it stops fairly well but still not like they should. I feel like I am about at worlds end with this does anyone have an idea??

Posted

To rule out any mechanical issues with the brakes, block off the flex lines with vice grips. Do one flex hose at a time. Block the hose off, start the engine, see if the brake pedal is any better. If you find no difference, move the vice grips to another flex hose and try again. This test will rule out any issues from that brake system beyond the flex line.

 

The link you posted contains a fair bit of what I call "guess logic". Not one of the posters in that thread bothered to mention that brake fluid is hygroscopic. That means it will absorb water or moisture. Once the fluid becomes contaminated with water, the boiling point will drop dramatically. Get the brakes hot, and the water will boil out of the fluid, leaving air in the system. Brake fluid with no water in it will be virtually clear, with a slight bluish tinge to it. As it starts to become contaminated, it will darken up in the brown range of colour. Once it changes to the black colour, all bets are off in predicting brake action. If the shop you took the truck to is unable to figure out why the Tech 2 is not helping, it is time to change shops. Diagnostic tools are only as good as the technician using them. They are not a problem solving tool, they are simply a diagnostic tool. It is the technician that is the problem solver, not the scan tool.

 

You may want to try testing the master cylinder as well. To do this, start engine, and put a light pressure on the pedal. Do not apply hard pressure. Under light pressure if the pedal slowly begins to drop away, and continues to drop until it reaches the floor, the master is likely starting to fail. Applying high pressure to brake pedal will likely stop the pedal from dropping to floor. This is due to the design of the seals (cups) on the master cylinder pistons. Higher pressure will force the seals to press tighter to the bore, light pressure will allow the fluid to leak past the seals. The fluid will not likely leak out of the master cylinder unless the last (or first depending on your logic) seal is worn. If you loosen the master cylinder you may see fluid between master and brake booster. If there is fluid in there, it is time to replace master.

Posted

If there is nothing obvious, replace all the rubber lines...the two for the front calipers, the drop from the frame to the rear axle, and any other rubber lines in the brake system. ..they swell and swell shut with no visible indications. This limits the fluid that can pass through and will cause poor braking.

 

I've had the rear line swell to the point that the rear drum brakes did nothing.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

You can test the flex hoses by applying vice grips near the end of the hoses. Clamp off near the frame and test, then clamp off near the other end and compare results. If they are the same, then the hose is very likely still good. I have not seen a flex hose cause a low pedal in an automobile. I have seen it happen on a motorcycle though, Then again, a motorcycle generally has nothing but flex hoses between the master and they calipers.

Posted

ok. this is what I have done. we bled all 4 brakes again for good measure. we checked all the hard ware and made sure everything was tight and leak free.

 

it didnt change anything. I clamped the rubber lines one at a time and think there maybe something to that. I have replced the passenger side rubber line but not the driver or the rear rubber ones. with the line clamped off my wife said the pedal didnt feel any different. however I could feel the line swell. with my vice grips just touching the outer hose the driver side deffinatley swelled more than the newer passenger side. and the rear was about the same as the driver side so there is something to be said there that I would probably bennefit from replacing the lines.

 

also is it normal for the line to move when the brake pedal is pressed?? once again the rear and driver side moved more than the newer passenger side. just for kicks I made sure I wasnt losing vaccuum or anything at the booster. and the check valve is working as well.

 

the last thing I found is that if you press down on the master cylinder a little you can hear air come out is that normal?? also I am not sure if my friend spilled a little fluid when topping the mc off but where the reservoir meets the master cylinder was wet like they may have been leaking???? I really hope freakin not its new!! not rebuilt!!

Posted

ok. this is what I have done. we bled all 4 brakes again for good measure. we checked all the hard ware and made sure everything was tight and leak free.

 

it didnt change anything. I clamped the rubber lines one at a time and think there maybe something to that. I have replced the passenger side rubber line but not the driver or the rear rubber ones. with the line clamped off my wife said the pedal didnt feel any different. however I could feel the line swell. with my vice grips just touching the outer hose the driver side deffinatley swelled more than the newer passenger side. and the rear was about the same as the driver side so there is something to be said there that I would probably bennefit from replacing the lines.

 

also is it normal for the line to move when the brake pedal is pressed?? once again the rear and driver side moved more than the newer passenger side. just for kicks I made sure I wasnt losing vaccuum or anything at the booster. and the check valve is working as well.

 

the last thing I found is that if you press down on the master cylinder a little you can hear air come out is that normal?? also I am not sure if my friend spilled a little fluid when topping the mc off but where the reservoir meets the master cylinder was wet like they may have been leaking???? I really hope freakin not its new!! not rebuilt!!

 

When the line swells up it will attempt to shorten up as well. This is due to the braided sheath under the rubber coating. If the sheathing expands, it has to shorten up at the same time. Take a look at your shoe laces. If you take the lace and push it towards itself, you will see it expand in diameter at the same time. Or if you pull the lace, it gets thinner. Same action on the flex lines.

 

Brake fluid is water soluble, so, flush off the master cylinder and booster face to remove any errant brake fluid, then dry it off as best you can, compressed air would be handy for this, make sure you have removed all the brake fluid from the surface before using compressed air. You could also remove the bolts holding the master cylinder onto the booster and take a rag to clean up any fluid in there as well. Drive the truck for a bit and see if the fluid comes back.

 

The air sound you are hearing could be normal. Is the engine running when you hear this? Does the noise only happen as the pedal moves, and stops when the pedal stops moving?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.
    • Yes.  The 2.7 Turbomax has Active Fuel Management.  It is NOT the same as the V8s.  Totally different system.     Here is an article from GM when the 2.7 came out explaining the cylinder deactivation and the valve lift system.  Starts at the section called "SCS Valvetrain":   New Turbocharged 2.7L 4-Cylinder Engine Powers Full-Size Trucks – TechLink         This is an internet myth going around.  It was alleged that some 5.3s had this mystical 8th digit of the VIN as an "E" which somehow meant it had a new one year only 5.3 that didn't have DFM.  The writer of said article and the person that made the claim conveniently can't count because they posted the VIN.  The 8th digit was a "D" which meant its still the 5.3 with DFM.  The 9th digit of the VIN was an "E" and the 9th digit isn't the engine code.  At all.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...