Jump to content

What PSI are you running on D/E load range tires?


magstar67

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just curious what air pressure guys are running that have added LT load range D or E tires?

 

I have BFG KO2 275/60/20s and running around 33 lbs.

Posted

Cooper ATP 285/70/17.

 

Cold PSI

Front 44

Rear 42

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

Posted

I read the sidewall and run about 90% of what it says

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I had Michelin E range tires on my 09. I kept them at 45 psi and could fill them up close to maximum for pulling a trailer a long distance. I found the ride unnecessarily firm with 70-80 psi for daily driving. I like the truck feel of a firmer tire but my regular passenger didn't agree. In reality, I put over 100,000 kms of mixed use driving on these tires and never filled them up past 45 psi. They wore evenly and still had life on them when I sold the truck.

Posted

Toyo has a chart on their website and based on the tire size and vehicle weight it told me 40psi. On my tundra with 305/65-18 BFG TA/KO's I ran 46 psi. Just seemed to feel the best on that truck. Haven't tried higher than 40 on the GMC.

Posted

Sounds like I'm running too low. My tires seem to flat spot when truck is parked a day or two especially when it's cold outside.

 

I'm going to go to 45 and see if that helps.

Posted

295/60/20 Toyo AT2 and I run about 42-43 when warm. Much more than that and they seem to be a little loose without added weight behind it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...