Jump to content

which diff to choose


scottie350

Recommended Posts

Posted

Pretty sure carriers are needed after 3.73 for 3.08 only least in the rear. Im unaure about the front still.

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

 

Scottie my shop guy texted me back saying that new front carriers are also needed for those running 3.08 and going to 3.42 and after.

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

 

Scottie my shop guy texted me back saying that new front carriers are also needed for those running 3.08 and going to 3.42 and after.

Ya but i have 3.42 going to 4.10, thats where im unsure, i know in the rear, 3.08 to 4.10 needs new carrier, but 3.42 to 4.10 doesnt.

 

Not sure if 3.42 to 4.10 in the front requires carrier.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Posted

I just thought that it depended on what side axle you have which goes by what engine you have when it comes with the K2s. So me having the 5.3 that means I have the 9.5" rear end so I figured all I would need is a ring and pinions for a 9.5" rear and whatever side the front is which is probably the same as at least the previous gen (07-13).

Posted

Ya but i have 3.42 going to 4.10, thats where im unsure, i know in the rear, 3.08 to 4.10 needs new carrier, but 3.42 to 4.10 doesnt.

 

Not sure if 3.42 to 4.10 in the front requires carrier.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

 

Ahh. Gotcha! From what my shop said 3.42 fronts are good to go!

Posted

 

Ahh. Gotcha! From what my shop said 3.42 fronts are good to go!

So 3.42 is just a ring/pinion change and I believe axles then? Perfect much cheaper to do myself and not do carriers

 

Im bolting my built engine in the car as we speak so I'll have to start buying up my gearing for the truck soon hehe

 

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

Posted

I just thought that it depended on what side axle you have which goes by what engine you have when it comes with the K2s. So me having the 5.3 that means I have the 9.5" rear end so I figured all I would need is a ring and pinions for a 9.5" rear and whatever side the front is which is probably the same as at least the previous gen (07-13).

I'm not too sure I need to call the shop and ask them. The front is what has me a bit confused

 

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

Posted

So 3.42 is just a ring/pinion change and I believe axles then? Perfect much cheaper to do myself and not do carriers

 

Im bolting my built engine in the car as we speak so I'll have to start buying up my gearing for the truck soon hehe

 

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

 

Yup. That's what I was told.

Posted

Scheduled for swap from 3.42 to AAM 4.11 in two weeks. Going to datalog and hit BBP up for an updated tune and have it on hand.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I wonder as well, why they would send me a text message with links to these suggested procedures totalling over $10,000 without even the slightest hint of how they arrived at these being necessary.
    • https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/     For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart.    Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement.  Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar.  OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar.  Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern?   Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin.    Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this.  ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent.    If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government.       
    • IF,IF,IF. If they cared about quality instead of profit and this applies to any company, what a concept. 
    • Good Morning Gents..hope everyone is enjoying a beautiful saturday morning. I have a 2001 GMC Sierra that I bought used in 2018. I am the 2nd owner and its a beautiful truck. Ive put about 60,000 miles on it and recently the front end has felt funny. Kind of loose when hitting bumps adn sometimes I actually feel a "bang" in the steering wheel. I took it to a local guy who said that everything was tight and he tightened the steering box. It didnt feel much better, so I had him replace the front shocks, which had noto been done since I bought it. It had the check enging light on so I took it into a local garage to fix that and check out the suspension. Everything is original and the rubber bushings that I can see look bad. They said everything was tight and there wasnt any play in the front end. Im concerned about the banging feeling in the wheel. Ive been driving this truck for 8 years, so I know how it usually feels and this is something new. Its a second vehicle, so I dont drive it all the time, but Im trying to use it more often. I live out in the country and some of the  roads are kind of rough and I alive on gravel roads. Anyone deal with anything like this before? 
    • Yes of course. There’s no experience in the Trump organization in hiring contractors. it’s not like they’re experienced in that field.😆
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...