Jump to content

Stock Exhaust Back Pressure???

BuyAmericanIron

By BuyAmericanIron
in Engines & Drivetrain

 Share

Recommended Posts

BuyAmericanIron Enthusiast

BuyAmericanIron

Posted
Posted

Tried something today out of curiosity. Pulled a rear O2 sensor and installed an exhaust back pressure gauge for testing. Truck is a 2016 Sierra Denali 6.2L. Here are the findings:

Stock exhaust

  • 30 mph cruising, .50 ~ .80 psi back pressure
  • 55 mph cruising, .50 ~ .80 psi back pressure
  • WOT in 3rd gear right before shifting at 5500 rpm, 5.5 ~ 5.8 psi back pressure

Stock exhaust with flapper bolted open

  • 30 mph cruising, 0 psi
  • 55 mph cruising, 0 psi
  • WOT in 3rd gear right before shifting at 5500 rpm, 4.8 ~ 5.1 psi back pressure

 

Magnaflow 15318 cat back exhaust

  • 30 mph cruising, 0 psi
  • 55 mph cruising, 0 psi
  • WOT in 3rd gear right before shifting at 5500 rpm, 0 ~ .1 psi back pressure. (the needle was fluctuating a bit but barely moving off of zero)

I thought this was very interesting and wanted to pass on what was learned. Now the questions. How much HP do you lose with 5.5 psi back pressure? How much fuel economy does .5 to 1.0 psi cost? When accelerating with the stock exhaust at WOT, the pressure would pretty much follow the tach. I.E. 3000 rpm, 3 psi, 4000 rpm, 4 psi, 5000 rpm 5 psi. It may have been in my head, but the engine seemed to run more freely with the Magnaflow and zero back pressure at any RPM.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

BuyAmericanIron
BuyAmericanIron

Tried something today out of curiosity. Pulled a rear O2 sensor and installed an exhaust back pressure gauge for testing. Truck is a 2016 Sierra Denali 6.2L. Here are the findings: Stock exhaust 30

Jon A
Jon A

Excellent data collection! It seems to be in vogue these days for people to say various mods "don't do anything" or "are for looks/sound only" etc. Instrumented data collection always trumps interne

Victory14red
Victory14red

The following is copied from http://www.dsmtuners.com/threads/exhaust-the-straight-scoop-on-backpressure.168578/ Granted this is a completely generalized answer not in any way specific to our trucks

Posted Images

GMC207 Enthusiast

GMC207

Posted
Posted

I don't know much about this stuff but would be curious to find out.

muddkatt Senior Enthusiast

muddkatt

Posted
Posted

The GM Borla exhaust claims a 10HP gain(GM makes the claim, not Borla), and no mention of increased fuel mileage. Only way to compare that I can think of is test the back pressure of the GM Borla system or put your truck on a dyno.

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

Tried something today out of curiosity. Pulled a rear O2 sensor and installed an exhaust back pressure gauge for testing. Truck is a 2016 Sierra Denali 6.2L. Here are the findings:

Stock exhaust.....

 

Excellent data collection! It seems to be in vogue these days for people to say various mods "don't do anything" or "are for looks/sound only" etc. Instrumented data collection always trumps internet speculation....

 

If you search through enough SAE papers you can likely find equations/example data that will correlate backpressure to power for a given set of circumstances. I can't tell you exactly off the top of my head what it would calculate out to be, but with 5 psi going to zero it's certainly not nothing.

  • Like 2
07Softail Senior Enthusiast

07Softail

Posted
Posted

Didn't Black Bear do a test between Performance and stock mufflers and found no gains on the dyno? Someone did at one time not sure who.

 

RT

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

Didn't Black Bear do a test between Performance and stock mufflers and found no gains on the dyno? Someone did at one time not sure who.

 

Old tests on different engines (exhaust and intakes) are not really applicable to the new engines. Items that pose little restriction on a 300 HP engine can become big restrictions on a 420 HP engine.

TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted

Pretty sure it was on the 14's when they first came out.

 

RT

 

It was on the previous generation trucks.

glcbn Enthusiast

glcbn

Posted
Posted

Those numbers make me feel good that I've had my flapper clamped open since the thread about it's usefulness good or bad first appeared on these forums. Granted, it doesn't help with WOT, but I rarely ever do that anyway.

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

Pretty sure it was on the 14's when they first came out.

 

 

Do you have a link, I don't think I saw it. I do know the CAI test everybody quotes here all the time was done on an older, much less powerful engine.

glcbn Enthusiast

glcbn

Posted
Posted

 

 

Do you have a link, I don't think I saw it. I do know the CAI test everybody quotes here all the time was done on an older, much less powerful engine.

 

Is this the one you are referring to?

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/145676-bbp-independent-intake-test-results/page-1

 

I searched for exhaust tests by BBP, but couldn't come up with any on the Ecotec.

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

Yup. There's nothing wrong with the test (although many misinterpret the results), I give Kudos to BB for doing it, it's just that on an engine that makes 100 more HP and all the parts being tested are somewhat different, different results can be expected.

07Softail Senior Enthusiast

07Softail

Posted
Posted

I would venture to guess that the damn valve after the muffler would be the only obstruction causing the minimal BP evident in the testing. Even bolted open there is still that weight on the blade itself that still blocks a bit of flow imo. Can these gauges be rented at an auto store if so I will perform this test being that I will be bolting up some headers soon with the stock exhaust and will be removing the valve completely and I will do a before headers, after headers, with valve, without valve for comparison.

 

RT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,462 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • MASONV88888888
      Another 6.2L engine failure!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • MASONV88888888
      Rattle in the rear!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • Buckwild27
      Gas Prices

      By Buckwild27 · Posted

      I have 2 choices. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      Gas Prices

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...