Jump to content

For sale: Kooks Long Tube Headers and Kooks Y Pipe

dylbeau1500

Recommended Posts

dylbeau1500 Enthusiast

dylbeau1500

Posted
Posted

Hello,

I have some headers and y pipe that I am selling for a friend and are coming off of a 2014 5.3 Silverado.

 

Kooks 1-3/4" x 3" Long Tube Headers for both Silverado and Sierra V8 (5.3 & 6.2) Part# 28602201

 

Kooks Y-pipe with ultra high performance green cats for Silverado and Sierra 1500 V8 5.3

Part# 28603300

 

Both parts have only been on the vehicle for less than a week, I need to sell them because they are to loud for my friends living style and he is changing to a new setup. When it was installed along with a Corsa catback it sounded amazing and I will upload a video. He took off the catback and it had a nice tone to it along with a nice performance increase, unfortunately his soon to be wife found how much it all was and wants it gone. Now anyone who is looking for a quality setup, kooks are definitely a good company to go with because they create quality products.

 

I am looking to get 1600 for both parts even though retail is over 2000 easy. I am located in Northern New Jersey and would love these gone. Any questions or anything please pm or comment and let me

 

https://vimeo.com/163635564

 

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

dylbeau1500 Enthusiast

dylbeau1500

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That could work, what part were you interested in?

 

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

dylbeau1500 Enthusiast

dylbeau1500

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just the headers. I don't think the Y pipe will fit my truck.

 

Thanks

Josh

Im guessing you have the 6.2l? And yeah that can be something I can probably do, it would have to be shipped though right?

 

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

Jlm02a3094 Enthusiast

Jlm02a3094

Posted
Posted

Im guessing you have the 6.2l? And yeah that can be something I can probably do, it would have to be shipped though right?

 

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

Yes, I have the 6.2L

 

I'm unsure about the shipping part yet. NJ isn't too far from me, and I frequent NY quite a bit. I suppose it all comes down to how much the are without shipping first.

 

Thanks

Josh

Rawyzf Senior Enthusiast

Rawyzf

Posted
Posted

Headers only price?

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

dylbeau1500 Enthusiast

dylbeau1500

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Headers only price?

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

900

 

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

07Softail Senior Enthusiast

07Softail

Posted
Posted

How hard are they to install? Do you have to take the engine out or something?

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

LOL.... No! Easy 2-3 hrs to remove and replace.

 

RT

Rock1500 Senior Enthusiast

Rock1500

Posted
Posted

LOL.... No! Easy 2-3 hrs to remove and replace.

 

RT

Good to know as I never did anything like this. I'd be interested probably as well. I live in ct so It's an easy travel.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

dylbeau1500 Enthusiast

dylbeau1500

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Good to know as I never did anything like this. I'd be interested probably as well. I live in ct so It's an easy travel.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

I sent you a PM if you are interested

dylbeau1500 Enthusiast

dylbeau1500

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Also interested in headers if deal with Jlm falls through.

I sent you a PM if you are interested

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...