Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dexos oils are minimum requirement, aka good enough lubricants. There's obviously better made lubricants on today's market that meet and exceed OEM.

 

The Dexos seal is good enough for me. Warranty is nice to have.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

In over 40 years, in both personal and commercial trucks, I have yet to have a dealer or OEM even ask what oil I was using.... brand or viscosity. That is over 40 years of ownership, including over 5 million miles of commercial truck operation. Unless one opens their mouth and says something, doubtful anyone would check. Any of the name brands on the shelf, blends and full synthetics, will provide more than ample engine protection. Even a few "conventional" oils will meet dexos1 specs, though not dexos1 "approved", but that is only a select few.

Posted

dexos is a way for GM to drive business into their dealerships and to make money of oil companies by licensing the dxos logo.

 

2520799_oil_filter.jpg

Posted

In over 40 years, in both personal and commercial trucks, I have yet to have a dealer or OEM even ask what oil I was using.... brand or viscosity. That is over 40 years of ownership, including over 5 million miles of commercial truck operation. Unless one opens their mouth and says something, doubtful anyone would check. Any of the name brands on the shelf, blends and full synthetics, will provide more than ample engine protection. Even a few "conventional" oils will meet dexos1 specs, though not dexos1 "approved", but that is only a select few.

When the rod bearing failed on our new Subaru (a stop-sale vehicle that got sold anyway), the dealer was only concerned the oil had been changed; not that I was running 5w40 Rotella because of the turbo (which was probably why it took longer for the rod bearing to fail)...5w30 to 20w50 is allowed in my model year.

 

Dealers aren't that sophisticated, and it would be highly improbable for them to conduct a UOA and confirm positively what oil you were actually running.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

Nor are UOA sophisticated to be able to tell what brand oil or what spec it was when new, all it can do it give current condition and weather it was still good oil.

Posted

Nor are UOA sophisticated to be able to tell what brand oil or what spec it was when new, all it can do it give current condition and weather it was still good oil.

 

So they would base it on oil condition, like if it was ever changed, a.k.a 'over maintrnanced' meaning over service intervals.

Posted

Basically, the Subaru dealer told me that they were only concern that the oil had been changed...in other words, they were only concerned that the engine wasn't full of sludge from not changing oil.

 

After this was all said and done, the guy proceeded to tell me of a newer Subaru that suffered a turbo failure...the owner hadn't changed the oil in 87,000 miles, only added oil as needed. So those people exist...

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

  • 1 month later...
Posted

This was an official GM poster. But up here GM also recommends T6 5W40 for Duramaxes during the winter.

Probably regional.

 

 

I use 5w40 in colder months and 15w40 in warmer months for my diesels. A couple of applications, 10w30 year round. Better cold flow at start up with a 5w40 in cold temps is always a good thing. Both 5w40 and 15w40 are the same viscosity at operating temps. One could use 5w40 year round if they had a mind to do so. Wouldn't hurt a thing.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I am not brand loyal to oil, have tried a few brands. There are some that I won't try again even if free.

 

Filters I am more fussy on, either AC UPF48R or the Frame premium line, had excellent UOA on both.

 

Air is AC only.

 

A bit of a ramble, but bear w/ me. :P

 

My '17 is the 4th truck I've owned w/ the OLS. Since none of the owners manuals for these trucks have said whether to use conv' or syn' oil, I've run syn' due to the longer drain intervals. I have only used AC or WIX filters. Until GM/AC obsoleted the longer OEM filter that my '04 6.0L used, I always ran the recommended filter. After finding the longer WIX replacement, I used longer filters in the '04 & '11.

 

Considering I used a syn' oil (Pennzoil) I may have to check the Petroleum Institute's site that someone liked to a while back. I know several folks use (pardon my choice of words) oddball brands of oil (not readily available up here in the Great White North), I'm prone to stick w/ a "household" (and I don't mean store brand) producer of oil. Also, I never thought of using a premium/better oil filter to suit the longer drain intervals.

 

The '17 specs a PF48 & I have 2 years of oil changes thru the dealer.

 

All that being said, can someone breakdown the benefits of the UPF48R filter? Would it be a good choice for someone like me that follows the OLS? I see for MY2017 GM says to use the smaller PF48E in the 6.0L, while the other motors call for the longer PF63E. Various back & forth responses to why on BITOG, so I'll likely stay w/ the short filter. I feel uncomfortable since a longer filter was spec'd in the past for the 6.0L motor and shorter filters were spec'd for the 5.3 in the past.

 

Finally, are the UPF48R filters available thru the various auto parts chains & what's a typical price?

 

TIA

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 381 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...