Jump to content

AEM Brute Force Intake


Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been thinking about adding a low restriction intake for a while. I was leaning towards UPD (NSV) until I heard about the problems some folks are having with them. So, I saw AEM had a new system for my 5.3 Silverado and checked it out.

 

Truckin' magazine did a dyno review of this intake and found good improvements in horsepower and torque. I don't have the article in front of me, but if I remember right, they found an increase of about 7-10 HP and 14 ft\lbs with the addition of the intake (rear wheel).

 

AEM's web site has nice graphs showing power and torque increases, but the graphs only start at 2500 RPM and go up to around 5000 or 5500 RPM. Further, their ads are a bit misleading (surprise!) as they tout really big power gains, but don't mention that those gains happen at higher RPM ranges (4500-5500) that most pple don't see in daily driving. Even when stomping on it, I don't think my truck has ever exceeded 3000-3500 RPM. It sure as heck has never gotten up to 4500.

 

Anyway, based on the trend of their graph lines, I'm guess there is about a 7 HP and 10 ft\lb power gain at around 1500-2000 -- the range I drive in the most. So, I bought and installed it.

 

There is somewhat of a noticable difference when driving. It's a bit louder, of course. But it seems to be a bit quicker and to be breathing easier (engine not working quite as hard). I haven't had it in long enough to see if there is mileage difference yet. As you would expect, these changes are subtle and not dramatic. And, they're only measured by seat-of-the-pants type feelings.

 

The intake is made up of quality materials that don't look thin, cheap, or crappy. Instructions are very clear. The primary tube is chrome with the AEM badge on it...looks cool. It does not take long to install. Overall, I'm happy so far.

 

Now for the exhaust....

Posted

I had the AEM on my 03 Tahoe and had to take it off. It had a terrible resonance between 1800-2300 RPM that I couldn't deal with. I went back to the Airaid unit I had on my 99 Sierra only with the addition of their new intake runner. I am very happy now. Hope you enjoy your AEM more than enjoyed mine.

 

As for power gains I think many of those are to be found somewhere between our heads and the seat of our pants, but hey it's only money right. And besides our trucks all look and sound so much better:).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Well, I received a message from the dealer...
    • The no sound problem is the audio amplifier. The audio amp has a heatsoak issue in some circuitry which causes it to miss the wakeup handhake. If it doesn't respond within a certain time parameter, then you get no sound. I brought it in and had the software update, but after further testing the tech made the call for a new audio amplifer. The software update I belive gives more time for the amp to respond, but if the amp is defective then you can still get no audio at times. After the update it went 12 days before no sound. After doing some research, apparently the fix is a new (updated) audio amplifer, the circuitry internally has been improved to better deal with heat. I had to wait 2 1/2 weeks because at the time, it was on backorder with no eta. Well the amp came in earlier this week. I had the amp and programming work done today. After picking it up I stopped at a few places, and whenever I started my truck, the audio was on instantly, so whatever they did it appears to work because it's never had sound that quickly......Hope this helps
    • Make sure the latch mechanism is properly greased. Look at the catch for fresh marks/scratches. And see if it has moved a little, too. 
    • I have the 18" black mutilspoke wheels that came with my truck. I like them as they are very subdued and look good with the 295/70's    I am sure that the next set of wheels I get will be some after market all black wheels. Or maybe some AT4X wheels.
    • Interesting question which you partly answered in the word 'potentially'. I think that is going to be a 'point of reference' inquiry. What are the touchstones?    This will sound petty but it is the main source of end fighting in threads on this topic. Define a motors "Life". Think about the various arguments that have been entertained on these pages in that very argument.    I can only speak from my viewpoint. Engine "Life" in my world is defined by power cylinder integrity. For the majority of engines it is the bore/ring interface that quits first. Loss of seal. Oil consumption and loss of power. Most Pro motor builders would agree and there is a good deal of information on using "Leak Down" as a primary indicator of bore integrity. At home a compression test is more the thing. If we can agree on that then I think CC Jensen has done its homework and I'd find it valid.    Now by my own definition, Dizzy, wife's Ecotec 2.4 I-4 has been dead since about 80K miles. And yet we have logged over 200K miles more on it. "Life" and "Usefulness" are therefore independent.      I know a mature fella right now who has just hit 300K on a Mitsubishi 3A92 NA MPFI motor and has done compression test every 100K. It was 205 psi after break in and is now about 195 and still even. He uses shelf oil but good filters and adheres to a 3K mile OCI. He even do UOA's on each of them for the first 50K.      I also know a fleet mechanic with that same motor that gets 300 to 500 K out of them but the are oil using, wristpin sloppy, skirt slapping motors. He ran one with a piston pin so loose the piston was bouncing off the cylinder head for about 20K miles before he called TOD. Both of them claim success.         
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...