Jump to content

4.3 vs 5.3

Manny254

By Manny254
in Engines & Drivetrain

 Share

Recommended Posts

Brian S. Enthusiast

Brian S.

Posted
Posted (edited)

Come on Brian, all that talk about saving money on the 4.3 from a guy who trades a truck in every two years. I buy every two years too, no matter how big a discount I get or good the trade in or what kind of truck I buy there's no saving money there. If for no other reason the V8 sound with exhaust is a good enough reason. If a grand a year is that big a deal the mid sized will save more money, pull the load and is faster. I own two V6 vehicles, one 4, one very old V8 all will out perform any new truck. The point there's really no real good reason for a V6 in a full sized truck, even tho it's a great motor, you didn't even buy one.

I didn't say "I" care much about saving money, obviously I'm not on a thrifty path through life. I'm just saying when faced with "There is NO reason to buy a 4.3l truck, including mpg" I have to disagree after buying one and using it a year.

 

If you're a young couple or single guy around $1000 a year can be money you think about. I pay that for my internet/tv/home phone now, saving that cash is like getting that stuff free. (or close to it)

 

I'm 50, I want my cars as quiet as possible now. I did the whole headers/cherry bombs on V8 muscle cars back in the day. These days I talk to friends and family on the Bluetooth and want to hear them, not the engine. When trucks go by me on the highway that sound like dump trucks I just look at the guy and think "Seriously? You find that preferable?". Would be like working with an impact wrench or chain saw, Sure, it needs to be done at times, but I don't shoot for racket like that whenever possible.

Edited by Brian S.
  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Colossus
Colossus

Eh. People were towing boats like that with the old 255 HP or less 5.7L trucks of yesteryears. And now a V-6 does it even better. No big deal.

Grumpy Bear
Grumpy Bear

We do realize that the ICE is a demand device…right? Motor only makes the power it needs to overcome the load running against it.   That said, with nearly 300 Hp on tap out of the 4.3 Ecotec3 those

Brian S.
Brian S.

I agree that we live in a "golden era" of car performance compared to the 60s and 70s.   What I'm saying is all this "5.3l performance is the stuff! Makes the 4.3l look like a slug!" is kind of a mo

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

Im 61, can't argue about the noise anymore. The only loud at my house is my old truck, once a wk the kid comes out to play, no more loud daily drivers since I was 58. Grumpy Bears single cab is a different argument, I was talking about big old 4 doors.

 

I didn't say "I" care much about saving money, obviously I'm not on a thrifty path through life. I'm just saying when faced with "There is NO reason to buy a 4.3l truck, including mpg" I have to disagree after buying one and using it a year.

 

If you're a young couple or single guy around $1000 a year can be money you think about. I pay that for my internet/tv/home phone now, saving that cash is like getting that stuff free. (or close to it)

 

I'm 50, I want my cars as quiet as possible now. I did the whole headers/cherry bombs on V8 muscle cars back in the day. These days I talk to friends and family on the Bluetooth and want to hear them, not the engine. When trucks go by me on the highway that sound like dump trucks I just look at the guy and think "Seriously? You find that preferable?". Would be like working with an impact wrench or chain saw, Sure, it needs to be done at times, but I don't shoot for racket like that whenever possible.

Brian S. Enthusiast

Brian S.

Posted
Posted

I thought about it more and I'd go one further:

 

I don't care who you are, saving even $500 a year matters. If you're a young father and sock that $500 a year into EdVest or similar when your son or daughter hits college you'll have saved a year of tuition and fees at a state school, minimum.

 

Anybody who has ever helped a kid through college (or couldn't) can probably see the value of having an extra year of tuition laying around.

 

A person has to look at the whole of their life, not just "Wowee, I can get that V8 sound for only a few bucks more a month!".

 

Easy trades that don't have relevant function differences can make for much larger long term gains.

  • Like 1
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

Now THAT is saving some money with the 4.3l!

 

To get my 17.4mpg:

1. I had 3.42 gears, 4wd, Xcab.

2. I live a north of you in WI and had it in AWD a good 3 months of the year.

3. When water open towing 3000lb boat weekly, 4-5X a year 200mile+ trips

4. My daily commute was mix of stop and go city/short hop hwy, done twice a day. (ate lunch at home)

5. My dad tells me I have a heavy foot and stop too suddenly to get decent mileage or have tires last.

 

So, my mpgs may only be valid for me, YMMV.

 

Now that's the kind of usage I would expect to produce 17 mpg. Thanks for your honesty. BTW Dad might be right. :driving:

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

I thought about it more and I'd go one further:

 

I don't care who you are, saving even $500 a year matters. If you're a young father and sock that $500 a year into EdVest or similar when your son or daughter hits college you'll have saved a year of tuition and fees at a state school, minimum.

 

Anybody who has ever helped a kid through college (or couldn't) can probably see the value of having an extra year of tuition laying around.

 

A person has to look at the whole of their life, not just "Wowee, I can get that V8 sound for only a few bucks more a month!".

 

Easy trades that don't have relevant function differences can make for much larger long term gains.

If saving mattered that much then maybe daily driving a truck shouldn't even be considered. You can get a good car for 15K and get 35MPG, and put your kid through college and buy them a house. I always used trucks for work when I retired I kept an old one around and daily drive a mid sized SUV that's gets 27 MPG on the HWY. Just saying if you need a truck not enough savings for a V6. I couldn't wait not to have to DD a truck, couldn't see the point unless I was working it.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Donstar Senior Enthusiast

Donstar

Posted
Posted

There is a measurable cost saving to the V6. However, the amount saved isn't significant when you prefer a V8. I prefer the V6 and the money saved is a bonus! Arguing over engine size is similar to debating cab and bed length configurations. Our preferences have different price tags!

  • Like 2
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

All this math and science....Can I just like my V6 truck because it's a good truck hahaha?

 

Sure you can. Just can't tell anyone why> :rollin:

Brian S. Enthusiast

Brian S.

Posted
Posted

 

Sure you can. Just can't tell anyone why> :rollin:

 

This is a HUGE factor.

 

Even if the new 4.3 had exactly (instead of 10% less on E10, and about same on E85) the same power as the old 5.3 most of us drove, most here would be saying, "You have to get a V8! The new one has more power ! There's that V8 sound!" What if you suddenly decide to buy a yacht, how will you pull it?!"

 

On E85 the new 5.3 is within 5 ft lbs torque and 18 hp of the 5.3s we all drove. I've driven both and if anything the 4.3 on E85 felt faster and more powerful. Even on E10 it was hard to tell the difference because it made 90% of the last gen 5.3s power at the same RPMs.

 

We've all been conditioned to think "There's no replacement for displacement" to which I say:

 

1. Teslas don't have displacement and are some of the fastest vehicles on the road.

2. The high pressure injected, high compression 4.3 makes more horsepower and torque than a lot of larger V8s we drove back in days gone by.

3. Ferd's Ecoboost is getting higher than V8 power out of tiny V6s.

4. Small diesels, turbo and non, are beating V8s as well.

 

The saying needs to change to, "Technology trumps all".

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

 

This is a HUGE factor.

 

Even if the new 4.3 had exactly (instead of 10% less on E10, and about same on E85) the same power as the old 5.3 most of us drove, most here would be saying, "You have to get a V8! The new one has more power ! There's that V8 sound!" What if you suddenly decide to buy a yacht, how will you pull it?!"

 

On E85 the new 5.3 is within 5 ft lbs torque and 18 hp of the 5.3s we all drove. I've driven both and if anything the 4.3 on E85 felt faster and more powerful. Even on E10 it was hard to tell the difference because it made 90% of the last gen 5.3s power at the same RPMs.

 

We've all been conditioned to think "There's no replacement for displacement" to which I say:

 

1. Teslas don't have displacement and are some of the fastest vehicles on the road.

2. The high pressure injected, high compression 4.3 makes more horsepower and torque than a lot of larger V8s we drove back in days gone by.

3. Ferd's Ecoboost is getting higher than V8 power out of tiny V6s.

4. Small diesels, turbo and non, are beating V8s as well.

 

The saying needs to change to, "Technology trumps all".

1 clarification I think, the 5.3 before the 14 I had was rated 285 HP or close to it. The new one is rated 355 or 385 on E85 or close to it. That noticeable.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

truckguy82 Senior Enthusiast

truckguy82

Posted
Posted

1 clarification I think, the 5.3 before the 14 I had was rated 285 HP or close to it. The new one is rated 355 or 385 on E85 or close to it. That noticeable.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Gmt900 5.3 was 315hp

  • Like 1
Brian S. Enthusiast

Brian S.

Posted
Posted

1 clarification I think, the 5.3 before the 14 I had was rated 285 HP or close to it. The new one is rated 355 or 385 on E85 or close to it. That noticeable.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that the new 5.3s have more power than the old 5.3s and as such differentiate themselves from the 4.3s.

 

My point with 4.3s has always been that if you were satisfied with the old 4.8 or 5.3, you would likely be satisfied with the new 4.3 as it's very comparable. Personally I never thought, "I really wish this thing was faster!" or "I wish this thing could tow more!" with all the past GM, Ford, RAM full size trucks I had that had very similar hp/torque to the new 4.3l.

 

If I had wanted or needed more power on those vehicles I would have just bought it.

Brian S. Enthusiast

Brian S.

Posted
Posted

What is always interesting to me in this debate is:

 

If the hp/torque of the current 5.3 is necessary to have, why didn't most of us drive 6.2s in past generations?

 

Most of us drove 4.8s and 5.3s, and the current 4.3 is around the same performance of those.

 

So apparently that level of performance was A-OK in 2013 and before, but these days you need much more. Doesn't make sense to me.

  • Like 1
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

What is always interesting to me in this debate is:

 

If the hp/torque of the current 5.3 is necessary to have, why didn't most of us drive 6.2s in past generations?

 

Most of us drove 4.8s and 5.3s, and the current 4.3 is around the same performance of those.

 

So apparently that level of performance was A-OK in 2013 and before, but these days you need much more. Doesn't make sense to me.

 

The stigma of driving a gas 6 cylinder in a 'man' truck is enough to put many off.

 

What a girly-boy motor. (Said in my best Arnold)

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

I don't think there's a stigma so much any more. Most people who buy fullsized trucks for DD aren't as concerned with the small savings on the V6. Plenty of power for sure especially in the two door. This is an enthusiastic site after all, most of us here want more than basic transportation or we be driving a economy car. Most of the trucks I had in the past I put on power adders. My 14 was the fist time since the 90s I didn't touch the engine, I tuned everything but the engine. It ran so good on E-85. Every vehicle ad on TV has performance in it somewhere in its ad especially Dodge Ram. I even see old ladies driving hot cars these days, so there's the why.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • twgraham
      Video processing module location

      By twgraham · Posted

      Can someone tell me where the video processing module is in a 2023 Silverado? I'm getting conflicting results that it's in the front passenger area or the rear passenger area behind the seat.
    • Chuck FB
      Missing thrust bearing? And oil selection

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Yes I agree, its what amounts to free advertising to let people know about his UOA testing company, and not that there is anything wrong with that but certainly that is a motivator for putting out videos about the science of oil as well as other topics such as oil and air filtration etc. The interesting part I found with his last video is not only the physics behind the reason for the varying wear due to a diesels working torque range causing more bearing load and that higher viscosity oil is of benefit, it was also that the chemistry behind the GM Dexos 0W-20 and the Mobil Dexos licensed 0W-20 are far enough apart that its showing up with a difference in wear even though the two oils are matched in viscosity and in that comparison viscosity was not having the finger pointed at it.    There are a few youtubers out there or one anyway that I have watched a bit of who has gone through the pains of accessing various countries manuals for a certain engine platform and while in the US/Canada it may say use 0W-20 or what have you for some Toyota product, in some other countries it sings a very different tune for the very same engine with the typical traditional oil viscosity/ambient temperature charts to help choose which oil viscosity is correct for the conditions the vehicle will be used in and in some cases its taken an engine in a US manual that states only use 0W-20 as per warranty coverage and yet that same engine in certain other countries may have up to a 15W-40 etc oil option that meets the spec. Another words the guy who is driving through Death Valley or Phoenix and south weather at 120f is often being fed a line of bs by the US system that has forced vehicle companies to restrict the warranty to a specific low viscosity oil for anterior reasons as well as the long drain interval suggestions.    Thankfully youtube is free ( yet anyway ) for viewers to sift through information and of course comes with the good and the bad ( truth and lies ) and we can choose to turn off/not watch what a person finds is bs or just not interested in the topic.         
    • Atlas
      Missing thrust bearing? And oil selection

      By Atlas · Posted

      No doubt... But, as someone who doesn't pay for his services, but who has provided a few views/clicks on his Youtube platform, the data around the Mobil oil testing I think does have some value including to "freeloaders" like me.   A lot of what he's doing is likely showing the OE's work in their oil selection, something that many of us had kind of assumed was true all along, a good balance of both excellent protection and efficiency.
    • Z45
      Missing thrust bearing? And oil selection

      By Z45 · Posted

      Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...