Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Are the 4.3 inferior to the 5.3 or does it just depend on what you plan on doing with it? I always hear why get a truck with a v6 some say its a waste. I know the v6 has come a long way from what they used to output. Is the power output a big difference between the two?

Posted

For daily driving, you'd be fine with a V-6. If you want to drag race or tow, you'll definitely notice the lack of power.

 

Most people don't really need a V-8, they just like more power. Same reason I wanted the 3600 V-6 in my grand am instead of the I-4.

Posted

Yea don't plan on racing at all more of just the usual things people do with trucks is haul and tow stuff. Would the 4.3 be a good start?

Posted

If you want to go to home depot and buy 6 bags of mulch- no problem.

 

small fishing boat- no problem.

 

1000 lbs of junk in bed, or large trailer, you will have harder time getting up to speed on the freeway and taking off from stop, but if you rarely do this stuff, you can handle it once in a while.

Posted

I have the 4.3L. I am very pleased. I do wish that they could have tuned it for 300hp from the factory. I am running e85 for the extra boost in power. But I have to say, between pulling my friends boat out of the water into his trailer, was the most demanding thing I have done with it. I also pulled out bushes with the tow hooks. Worked like a champ. I couldn't justify spending the extra on the v8 per month for a truck I basically drive to the train station 5 days a week. It's amazing how expensive cars/ trucks have gotten. I have a 16 LT Allstar v6 and the sticker price is around $46,000.

 

01f5744fd2f4bdfb7d3ba7e40cfd280c.jpg

 

Granted it's not a huge boat but it worked great

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I love my 4.3 Ecotec3 and the six speed in it pushing my RCSB. Things got more grunt than any old school 302 I ever drove. Frugal when driven so. I don't tow and I don't carry anything in it I wouldn't put in the trunk of a Bentley. I literally treat it like a car with a really big trunk. That said I'll drive my fathers truck with the lesser power iron 4.3 and four speed auto and find it a capable hauler and tow rig. Single cars or light (8N size) tractors on the flat bed. That sort of thing. A load of compost. Single horse trailer is fine too. And we never go more than about 400 miles.

 

More than that would have me rethinking this I guess.

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted

Unlike the 6.2 you can get the 5.3 across all trim levels. If you could save a ton between the two engines I'd bite. But in my case on12-31-13 I drove my Texas package GMC out the door for 29K. I had a ton of 5.7s and 5.3s that were under 300HP so the six would have been fine. There wasn't any savings to do it. Funny I went there to by a 13 6.2 Denali they had 25 left, I left with the 14 Texas package and 20K.

  • Like 2
Posted

Camaro45

 

That's a good size boat being able to tow it. Just don't want to stress the truck out with more than it can handle. Since I just got it don't want it falling apart on me

Posted

Eh. People were towing boats like that with the old 255 HP or less 5.7L trucks of yesteryears. And now a V-6 does it even better. No big deal.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

Camaro45

 

That's a good size boat being able to tow it. Just don't want to stress the truck out with more than it can handle. Since I just got it don't want it falling apart on me

Just as a reference point the boat is 21'. Would I plow with the truck, probably not. I wouldn't say the v8s are unnecessary because having more power is always better lol. If I used the truck more as a work truck or something to that effect, I would say your probably better off with the 5.3 at least there is no chance of disappointment lol.

Posted

My truck with a 4.3 is rated to pull up to a 7000 lb. load. I would trade for a 3/4 ton if I planned to regularly pull such a heavy load because the engine wouldn't be my biggest concern! The 4.3 is a powerful engine and provides all of the speed and strength most will require from a 1/2 ton. It is not "inferior" to the 5.3 or 6.2. The V8's produce higher HP and torque and are popular options. There are many options I would choose over an engine with extra power. However, I do appreciate the popularity of extra muscle under the hood!

  • Like 2
Posted

The 4.3L feels like a slug to me in anything bigger than a regular cab. Would have been a good engine for the Colorado though, I don't know why GM didn't use it in there.

Posted

The 4.3L feels like a slug to me in anything bigger than a regular cab. Would have been a good engine for the Colorado though, I don't know why GM didn't use it in there.

I'm not sure what a slug drives like however I assume you have compared a lot of vehicles to come to this conclusion. My current truck is a cc 4x4 std. bed with the 4.3. I find it to be very responsive based on the truck and power train combinations I have owned. Where do you notice the lack of power?

  • Like 1
Posted

I work at a dealer, I've driven every combination of Gm truck multiple times. I can always tell the v6s from the v8s just from driving them. The v6 just doesn't have the get up and go that the v8s have.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I find it amusing the OP doesn’t realize this threads heading includes several engines. He should have posted in the off topic section if he wanted a more narrow focus. I really appreciate and find amusing that he actually pointed out one of my many vehicles. The Odyssey. That happens to use 0-20 oil. I love pushing his buttons. 
    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...