Jump to content

Where did "fuel used" go?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Traded a 2007 Silverado Z71 for a 2015 Sierra Z71. Love the updated instrument cluster and more graphical DIC. Really nice, but I'm curious where the "fuel used" screen went. I used that thing all the time on my 07. Been thru settings and found place to toggle only those info screens you want to see (another cool upgrade). Am I just missing the fuel used somewhere? Totally bummed if GM took that out.....

 

~Vol

Posted

Standard display

 

 

2016 Denali dash has the fuel used readout on the page with the Timer it is one of 12 available pages to choose from. Not sure if other uplevel DIC's have it or not.

 

technology display

 

 

Tech display showing page count

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Would the screen that shows how many miles left on your current level of fuel not be a good substitute?

Posted

You could get a programmer. My Bully Dog shows fuel used.

How did you add that with a programmer? I have an OBDII plug in Bluetooth diagnostic monitor, but I don't think it has programming capability.

Posted

Would the screen that shows how many miles left on your current level of fuel not be a good substitute?

I use that screen too, but I always did the fuel used when filling up. It was eerily accurate versus the gas pump. I would also occasionally use it without resetting (trip for example) to keep up with overall fuel for an extended period. Just can't figure out what GM gained by removing that screen. It's obvious the truck still has the data. Weird.

Posted

How did you add that with a programmer? I have an OBDII plug in Bluetooth diagnostic monitor, but I don't think it has programming capability.

The Bully Dog has a built in function which displays fuel economy such as the MPG, amount of fuel used, energy consumption etc. As far as I know the programmer doesn't activate the fuel used option in the trucks DIC, but rather displays that data on the Bully Dog screen itself.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...