Jump to content

2017 6.2L 8 Speed Tuning


rzpalm

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, SILVER SLED said:

No I haven't.  It's actually $599 and it runs and shifts pretty good and I don't plan on drag racing this and getting every little 10th out of it.  So I haven't bitten the bullet yet.

I tried the T87 swapped in place of my T87A, but it didn't work. I have a Magnuson supercharger on the truck right now, and the downshifting is poor, so I might do the HP Tuners unlock and tune. That'll be $200 to unlock and then the 4 credits that I have left on my handheld.

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
36 minutes ago, Mileguru said:

I tried the T87 swapped in place of my T87A, but it didn't work. I have a Magnuson supercharger on the truck right now, and the downshifting is poor, so I might do the HP Tuners unlock and tune. That'll be $200 to unlock and then the 4 credits that I have left on my handheld.

Well if you were closer Id have you do mine. 

  • 1 year later...
Posted
3 hours ago, John Walker said:

What’s the best tuner for my 2017 Silverado 6.2?

Kind of a loaded question but for a stock truck you can get a blackbear or diablew tune. Or Get HPTuners and have someone send you a tune or learn yourself. I’d recommend looking into CJTUNES E85 sensor kit, too. 

Posted

The CJ costs so damn much though.

 

The harness is already under the truck and the sensor for an impala is like $30. Couple fuel connectors and blahdow I got flex fuel for $50 bucks.

Posted
15 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

The CJ costs so damn much though.

 

The harness is already under the truck and the sensor for an impala is like $30. Couple fuel connectors and blahdow I got flex fuel for $50 bucks.

Yes there are cheaper ways but this is one very simple way. They have good write ups and info if nothing else. 

Posted

For sure it's a simple kit, no doubt there. it's just about $200 too much for something like that is all lol.

 

I mean c'mon, $315 for a modified sensor with fittings and a harness extension.

 

Posted
On 4/15/2020 at 11:29 PM, CamGTP said:

For sure it's a simple kit, no doubt there. it's just about $200 too much for something like that is all lol.

 

I mean c'mon, $315 for a modified sensor with fittings and a harness extension.

 

Well i'm lazy and spend too much for ****** on my truck so its perfect. I didnt even look into how much it would cost to buy the sensor and build the harness extension. Times are tough. Trying to help out a small business haha

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,979
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 507 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...