Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2016 Sierra All-Terrain Crew Cab with 6000 miles on the clock. The rear windows on both sides are not working from either the driver's or passenger's window controls. Driver and passenger side front windows work both from the driver and passenger controls. I've tried with and without the window lockout switch on, that isn't the issue. The dealer didn't have enough time to look at it extensively the other day, but they said it wasn't a fuse. Any of you have this happen and if so, what was the cure?

Posted

2016 Sierra All-Terrain Crew Cab with 6000 miles on the clock. The rear windows on both sides are not working from either the driver's or passenger's window controls. Driver and passenger side front windows work both from the driver and passenger controls. I've tried with and without the window lockout switch on, that isn't the issue. The dealer didn't have enough time to look at it extensively the other day, but they said it wasn't a fuse. Any of you have this happen and if so, what was the cure?

 

try the opposite of this, To prevent passengers from opening a rear door (if equipped) from the inside or open- ing a rear window, press the Rear Door Security Lock/Rear Window Lockout button located on the driver’s door. The button indicator will illuminate.
Posted

My ten year old truck had issues on the drivers side controls - the controls on the rear doors worked fine. The problem I found was dirty contacts on the switches in the drivers door console. I am not sure if they still have the same design between 07 and 16 but they are not the best design.

Posted

I second checking the contact points on the switches. Seems odd that both would stop at the same time, but I've had that happen before. Super easy and quick fix if that's the case.

Posted

Hello LiveToRide,

 

We can imagine how frustrating this this rear window concern must be, especially so early into your vehicle ownership. Please keep us posted whether or not you return to your dealer to have this looked at. We’re available via private message to provide an extra layer of assistance. Thanks again, for being a valued customer!

 

Regards,

 

Anthony

GM Customer Care

Posted (edited)

I recently noticed that the rear door ajar indicator does not display on the DIC/speedometer gauge or give an audible warning. Rear windows are still inoperable. Being new to GM products (had Toyota pickups the last 23 years) are those warnings displayed for the rear doors? The front doors do give those warnings. Not too happy that we are already chasing electrical issues after 6000 miles.

Edited by LiveToRide
Posted

Sitting at the dealership waiting to replace both rear window switches. Very bizarre that both switches went out at the same time. I will provide an update after the fix is complete.

Posted

*Update*

Dealer discovered a water leak coming from the XM antenna which had found its way down into the electronics/wiring. Dealer says they've replaced "several" of those antennas and their seals. They actually kept my pickup overnight because there was so much moisture in the door and under the carpet. Anyone else experience this issue? Should I be concerned with mildew or mold issues going forward?

Posted

This is a fairly documented issue on this forum, as far as water leaking through the XM Antenna. There is a small "slot"for lack of a better word, in the back of the antenna that is perfect for letting water in. Luckily I read about it before I bought my truck, and shortly after my dad bought his so I caulked them both before their first washes.

Makes me glad I only have 2 doors, good luck!

Posted

Glad you got that issue worked out. I wonder if the dealer would perform this repair to a truck that has not yet leaked? Kinda thinking of letting them fix mine before I get a bucket of water inside.

Also...what is the dealer fix? Do they just caulk the antenna?

Posted

Thanks guys. The dealer won't fix an issue that might pop up. Just keep an eye on it. I have weather tech floor mats so I might have noticed the moisture earlier if I'd checked under those. However, its the snow and rainy season here so floor mats tend to stay wet anyway. The dealer said there haven't been any reported leaks on the ones they've repaired. Just a bad design on GM's end. Not sure why GM hasn't changed the design yet?

  • 3 years later...
Posted

I have an 09 LTZ Avalanche, both rear windows will not operate. I cleaned the contacts, checked all fuses, child lock, replaced the main control and still no resolution. 

 

I hear no noise, only the front windows will roll up and down, all the lights on the control work.  What else can I check? any ideas would be greatly appreciated. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...