Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I noticed that my passenger side headlight was out however the daytime running lamps still worked so I figured I blew a bulb. However when I put the bulb into the drivers side headlight it works fine. I used an electrical tester and I found that I have no electricity to the passengers side bulb. Is there a blown fuse to check or what should I do?

 

2014 GMC Sierra 1500 All Terrain

Edited by JKeshler
  • 3 years later...
Posted

Just curious, anyone find the fix?

Posted
4 minutes ago, tlaw91 said:

Probably has a blown BCM 3 fuse
F6DL
My first guess


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where is "F6DL" located?

Posted
15 minutes ago, tlaw91 said:

Probably has a blown BCM 3 fuse
F6DL
My first guess


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

My issue is with the drivers side rather than the passenger side. Would it be a different BCM fuse or would I still want to look at the BCM3?  Also what’s of F6DL?

Posted

Not looking at a diagram right now I think it’s F7DL
Fuse 7 Driver Left
So the fuse box on the left side of the dash
Hope this helps


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
7 minutes ago, tlaw91 said:

Not looking at a diagram right now I think it’s F7DL
Fuse 7 Driver Left
So the fuse box on the left side of the dash
Hope this helps


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I went through nearly every fuse including all the BCM fuses and they all seemed fine. I’m dropping the truck off tonight at my buddys garage and he’s going to take a look for me tomorrow. I’ll post an update as soon as he tells me what the issue is and what the fix for said issue is. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, tlaw91 said:

Not looking at a diagram right now I think it’s F7DL
Fuse 7 Driver Left
So the fuse box on the left side of the dash
Hope this helps


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ok, that's helpful. Here's an online layout of all fuses.

 

Fuse Layout Chevrolet Silverado 2014-2018

Posted

Remember the BCM will shut off power if it deems the resistance is too high on the circuit
It’s not like an old school all power all the time
So it can get tricky with incorrect bulbs or high resistance in the underhood fuse block or not clearing the dtcs after a repair etc etc


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Update: Truck wise, there’s nothing wrong with the truck wiring or fuses. My issue is with the truck side wiring for my fisher plow. Once he bypassed the plow wiring, the headlight worked fine but once he reconnected it, the light no longer worked. So I’ll have to take it back to the plow dealer and have him sort it out. Hopefully it’s a cheap fix. 

Posted

UPDATE:

I Ended up needing a new Isolation Module for the plow setup. Apparently the old ones are infamous for causing headlight issues both truck side and plow side but this new module is a soft start module and should not have the same issues. Fingers crossed... $260 for parts and labor for the new module.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My brother has a 2007 Avalanche with afm 5.3. It`s got 176,000 miles. Runs like a clock. Never been apart. Co worker has a 2010 Tahoe with afm 5.3. 230,000 miles. Never been apart. Runs like a clock. So, even though cyl deac is a weak spot, they can go the distance.   BUT, these engines had the oil changed regularly, AND had 5w30 as spec. I wonder if they would have lasted this far on 0w20? I`ll bet not.
    • I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...