Jump to content

Steering Assist Reduced Issue


Towerhog

Recommended Posts

Posted

OK. 2017 LTZ 6.2L DC. Had an issue with Steering Assist Reduced Drive With Care message. First of June I get the message, took to dealer, they looked at it, said it was a ground block issue. Checked the ground blocks indicated by the DTC's and found no issues. Deleted the codes. Truck returned.

 

A week goes by and the message appears again while driving. The truck goes into limp mode. Shut the truck off, restarted. message still there but no issues with transmission driving to the dealer. This time I had transmission codes as well. They took the truck for a week and re-secured the ground blocks with star washers then test drove off and on for that week. Codes are gone.

 

Today. Got the message last Saturday. Got to the dealer yesterday. They kept it over night and called today to say that they had found the most probable problem with the system. Turns out they found BCM codes in every module. They cleared the codes but one was persistent. The license plate circuit. It kept showing a high voltage draw. I had installed LED bulbs for the license plate about 10 months ago with no issues (or so I thought). They replaced the LED bulbs with the OEM bulbs and VIOLA!! The codes did not reappear. The service writer said they cant be certain that was the cause of the message, but the codes had not retuned since the LED bulbs removal.

 

So I guess LED bulbs do go bad. Who knew. The dealer said they would eat the cost of this one even though the possible cause were aftermarket bulbs.

Posted

Looks as though the bulbs weren't the problem. Got message again on Sunday. Goes back in to the dealer Wednesday.

Posted

Known problem. Search these forums for "electrical issues". There is a TSB with 4 or 5 things the tech is supposed to check (should be PIT5405 attached in one of those threads). Positive battery cables, positive connection to starter, but most importantly the G218 ground for the BCM. I had the same issues with lots of codes and my dealer couldn't fix it. Once I found the TSB on these forums I checked the ground myself (easy to do and takes about 20 minutes). Since I fixed the ground I have not had any issues.

Posted

Known problem. Search these forums for "electrical issues". There is a TSB with 4 or 5 things the tech is supposed to check (should be PIT5405 attached in one of those threads). Positive battery cables, positive connection to starter, but most importantly the G218 ground for the BCM. I had the same issues with lots of codes and my dealer couldn't fix it. Once I found the TSB on these forums I checked the ground myself (easy to do and takes about 20 minutes). Since I fixed the ground I have not had any issues.

 

 

Thanks. They did check and tighten (cleaned ground contacts and used star washers to ensure good contact with frame). They indicated they did the G107, G121, G400 and G101 per GM's diagnostics. They didn't mention the G218 point. The dealership was referred by GM Tech Assist to GM Doc 4778218, 4372049, 4775768 for electrical diagnostics. Ill let them check it out this week and see what they come up with. After it comes back Ill crawl under with my service manuals and check the ground blocks, especially G218.

Posted

 

 

Thanks. They did check and tighten (cleaned ground contacts and used star washers to ensure good contact with frame). They indicated they did the G107, G121, G400 and G101 per GM's diagnostics. They didn't mention the G218 point. The dealership was referred by GM Tech Assist to GM Doc 4778218, 4372049, 4775768 for electrical diagnostics. Ill let them check it out this week and see what they come up with. After it comes back Ill crawl under with my service manuals and check the ground blocks, especially G218.

 

You don't have to crawl anywhere to check the G218 ground:

 

1) Remove A-pillar trim pieces.

2) Pry up the front part of the dash trim (the dash is split near the windshield and defroster vent).

3) Optional -- remove the tweeters for easier access.

4) Remove the ground nut near the front corner. Clean under the nut, around the stud base, and make sure the dash insulation is not pinched. The G218 ground is on the driver's side but I did the one on the passenger side while I had the dash open.

5) Replace everything.

 

Takes about 20 minutes total while you are sitting in your garage or driveway ...

Posted

Known problem. Search these forums for "electrical issues". There is a TSB with 4 or 5 things the tech is supposed to check (should be PIT5405 attached in one of those threads). Positive battery cables, positive connection to starter, but most importantly the G218 ground for the BCM. I had the same issues with lots of codes and my dealer couldn't fix it. Once I found the TSB on these forums I checked the ground myself (easy to do and takes about 20 minutes). Since I fixed the ground I have not had any issues.

 

 

Sad that you had to find the TSB and do this versus the dealership...

Posted

Got truck back this morning. Faults again cleared. Found 3 codes in system U0140 Loss Comm with BCM, U0121 Loss Comm with ECM, U0100 Loss Comm with EBC. They separated connections for all control modules, inspected for dent or damaged pins. Then added Electric grease and re-secured all connections.

 

We'll see what happens this time.

 

As for the G218 ground. They did that on the first service. Appreciate the info.

  • 7 months later...
Posted

HELP! So I recently installed aftermarket tow mirrors on my 2017 Z71 LT. When I went to turn it on to check if everything was working, this message popped up "steering assists reduced. Please drive carefully" I checked all my wiring and everything seems to be fine. Anybody have any idea why this is happening? Any input would he greatly appreciated. 

  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 4/17/2018 at 6:13 PM, Htown_LTZ said:

HELP! So I recently installed aftermarket tow mirrors on my 2017 Z71 LT. When I went to turn it on to check if everything was working, this message popped up "steering assists reduced. Please drive carefully" I checked all my wiring and everything seems to be fine. Anybody have any idea why this is happening? Any input would he greatly appreciated. 

i have the same issue. Got some mirrors from boost auto parts and installed with no issues. Now im getting this code. 

 

Posted

Well, I took mine off earlier today. It was a hassle getting in and out of my garage/carport. Maybe taking them off will remove that code. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Htown_LTZ said:

Well, I took mine off earlier today. It was a hassle getting in and out of my garage/carport. Maybe taking them off will remove that code. 

I really don’t wanna take them

off since I paid over 400 for them. 

Posted

Check with pgamboa on this forum that makes all the wiring harnesses for all the upgrades including mirrors. He has plenty of posts on here and should be easy to find.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I just started having AC issues with my 2012 Sierra. The symptom is blowing warm air on all vents.  Here is what I have checked so far. Compressor clutch appears to be engaging and cycling  I checked all fuses and relay, no issues. The only thing I have notices is the short line that comes from the firewall is very cold / frosted. This line is approximately 12 inches long. The coldness stops when it hits the first line connector. As far as AC compressor - At first start the clutch engages, runs continually, Short AC line frosts up. After idling for several minutes the AC line thaws out some but is still cool and the compressor clutch starts cycling on and off every 5 seconds.  Any suggestions on what to look at next would be appreciated.  
    • Unless you are using a bypass filer system with a Beta of 1000 at 2 micron the commercial filters we have access to, even the very best of them, are poor at the 5 to 10 micron range the typical UOA test can 'see'. Point is there are some truly awful filters being sold A 45 micron Beta 75 filter is what Dyson used to call a screen door on a submarine. That leaves wear metals disconnected from filtration unless particulates are larger than the test can 'see' and yet captured by the filter...which is its job. If that is true then you have a major issue screaming at you.    The graph isn't mine. It belongs to GM and their study on this area. I looked up those studies and provided those SAE tech paper addresses multiple times. Machinery Lubrication displayed it and confirmed it. So if you have doubts about the study you'll have to take it up with GM Engineering. Just like you would have to take up a difference in opinion about the meaning a word with Webster or the length of on inch with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.      Most manuals have two schedules. "Normal Service" and "Severe Service". On it's face it tells you that oil in severe service is more highly stressed and doesn't "Last as Long". The item to bore in on is LAST...what does that mean?    It's the same question one asks about how long to toast bread. What are the inputs? Bread type? Wattage of the toaster? Distance from the elements? What is your preferred level of done?    So lets paint this with a broader brush. Oil is made up of the base and the additive package. The first is altered by heat and oxygen and later is sacrificial with a finite life subject to inputs toward that end. Resistance and supply.    It is the reason an OEM's OCI's are determined by 1.) the specifications of the recommended lubricant and 2.) risk management toward the bottom line. Those lubricants are also subject to cost effectiveness for the OEM.    There is a tendency for most people to believe that the OEM recommended oil rest on the top shelf and that anything other is lesser than. Truth is there are more oils on higher shelves than those on the lower shelf below the OEM's. They make that choice on COST TO THE OEM. Testing is incidental to the margin.    GM makes MONEY, the car/truck is a TOOL to leverage MONEY. Insert whatever car brand you like. Until you forking over a million plus COST not quality is the driver. Thus it is by DESIGN the recommended OCI's and oils fall well short of 'best practice protections'. Proof isn't hard to find. GM Ecotec I-4 2400 breather system and cold start PCM tuning has killed more motors and resulted in more litigation for those that used the 'recommended' practice than GM could bear. What was their response? SHORTEN THE OCI. TWICE.    I don't know how long to leave oil in an I don't know how the oil will respond to MY circumstances and because I don't and can't blanket statement or anecdotal evidence my way out of it.....I TEST and FIND the right OCI for the oil I CHOOSE. There is no shortcut but there is blind allegiance. I don't blindly trust anything.    People hear the word 'detergent' and believe that in the context of oil it means the same thing as laundry soap... Only in the most rudimentary way. It's the first additive to give up on you and they are putting less and less with each new API standard. Solvency can be used but it cost. Some unique undisclosed chemistries can be used. Valvoline R & P in example. OEM's haven't an interest in anything they see as limiting market participation. Whatever.         
    • For some unexplained reason my father wanted a salvage yard. As we were getting the family business off the ground one brother ran the salvage yard. We gathered there when rained out working on pipelines in the eighties to pull parts. Perfectly good running vehicles would come to us simply because they wouldn’t pass emissions inspection. We were able to swap parts and sell some of them. I got a clean old nova with a bad engine. I pulled a perfectly good small block out a Camaro. A father and son project with a rebuilt engine. The son couldn’t get the engine running right. The problem was the spark plugs weren’t gapped. The 90s vehicles probably widened the gap of shade tree do it yourself engine repair. My do it yourself hot rod repair stopped at the 70s. After that my trusted mechanic kept them in running shape. 
    • I have an old dental chair in my shop. Something I got for free and apparently it has more than scrap value? People collect them although mine isn't restored or anything. It's visually interesting (1930's Ritter) which is why I like it. And it IS decently comfortable if you kick back.   When a good buddy of mine saw it he said, let me guess, Atlas. It's a conversation piece? As in, you ask the questions, they do the talking?   Where do you hide the jar of teeth?   I would never.   
    • Are we talking about the same thing, though? The 7 versus 3 wear metals was from Lakespeed's 3.0-specific oil brand comparison test between AcDelco oil and Mobil ESP. The filter remains a constant so whatever excess particles the AcDelco oil is producing aren't being filtered out.   I'm assuming there's a parallel comparison to be made; IF the filter can filter down those particles, engine life increases, and your graph makes the case that a better filter (lower micron rating) can increase engine life. Introducing fewer particles AND filtering those particles with higher efficiency is the best of all worlds. Good oil, good filter.   Where we may disagree is the "baseline relative engine life". I'm more apt to believe the base engine life value is 200k+ on very average oil and filters, "bulk oil of unknown brand and white-label generic fleet-grade filter, Jiffy Lube"   Going from a 10 micron filter to a 5 micron filter should boost a base 200k to 275k in a vacuum as a single factor alone.   Here's the whatabout: How does regularly changing the oil and filter ahead of recommended schedule influence baseline engine life? Most people aren't going to science the heck out of this stuff or ask about Micron ratings, HTHS, or wear comparison tests at Jiffy Lube. Most of the Jiffy lube techs would say they need to call their tech support line to even try to get an answer.   --   Because we love anecdotes here, when I was fishing for 4.3 parts at a local yard this weekend, ALL of the 4.3 vehicles had well over 200k. I love looking at odometers of junked vehicles. How far did THIS go before landing at the crusher? The ones that still had engines weren't seized. None of them were vehicles I'd consider were Amsoil queens, in fact most of them had some kind of service cling-sticker in the corner of the windshield indicating it probably had very average maintenance services. Even the fresh parts rigs- I'm not sure taking an S/T series to 400k has much value considering the running value of those vehicles was probably somewhere around $1,000. 25+ years is a good run on time alone.   The intake manifold I salvaged had clean and bright pool areas. As expected, I found the fuel lines in the manifold rubbed through, just like mine. I'm guessing the lines on that donor truck started leaking, the truck started running rough, and its owner said that's enough I'm unwilling or can't take it out of service for several days, or spend $1000+ to repair it at a shop, it's simply time for a newer more reliable vehicle (or, more than likely, this is the 2nd, 3rd time this has happened in the truck's lifetime). While I don't count on my Blazer for reliability, the thought of giving it away for parts at certain points during my adventure, and being mentally free from its needs has has crossed my mind. I'd be losing $1500 or so, but I can only make more money; not time.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...