Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 4/23/2018 at 5:10 PM, bc-chris said:

so i own my own business... an embroidery company.  one of the first things i did when i got my truck was take it to one of the upholstery shops that i do jobs for.

 

they were worried about keeping the "stock look" of the headrest after re-assembly (since it would all need to be taken apart so that i could embroider the headrest panel) so be aware of that.

 

when i redid the interior of my '89 we had a little fun...  lots of chevy logos in the cab....

 

seats-new.thumb.JPG.844261307b63706ad69a0cedc029a17d.JPG

 

bowtie-floor.thumb.JPG.58915eccdf465e363b0342032611a5c3.JPG

 

5ade47903edee_CopyofIMG_8848.JPG.7b5d79b76c1cbca7e8dfd2894890a0ab.JPG

 

chevrolet-door.thumb.JPG.5d0e7164c763e769f4c0194345f0daa1.JPG

 

this was on the door for a while....

flame-bowtie.thumb.JPG.e805a5fcd40b331ad3d6f69c35dccad6.JPG

 

then i changed it to this...   89Chevy....

IMG_6097.thumb.JPG.300811dca13b6155b339ec1971b9a054.JPG

 

 

 

I have a 1992 with a 5.3 LS swap. Is that center console stock or did you get that somewhere? Looking for a replacement for mine. 

IMG_0184.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Gagliano7 said:

I have a 1992 with a 5.3 LS swap. Is that center console stock or did you get that somewhere? Looking for a replacement for mine. 

IMG_0184.JPG

 

i assume it is a stock center console - it was in the truck when i bought it (i bought the truck in '97)

Posted (edited)

Thanks i wasn't sure if they came that way since everyone i have ever seen had the bench style seats without the center console. I when i bought mine i was told the seats and console were out of a tahoe.I am also looking to doing that dakota dash new version. 

Edited by Gagliano7
  • Like 1
Posted
On ‎4‎/‎24‎/‎2018 at 7:23 AM, bc-chris said:

 

ohhhh... i got lots of pics of my baby!!!  there's no way i could get rid of the '89 when i bought my '14 - i just love it too much!  (and dumped waaaaaay too much $$ into it !  ha! ha!)

 

http://25799720848_0c2b96ee36_c.jpgIMG_5422 by bc-chris, on Flickr

 

***the "2500" on the door is a joke between myself and a magazine editor... said he couldn't run a feature on my truck unless is was a 2500, so i swapped out the 1500 piece for a 2500 piece - ha! ha!

 

http://14978307851_3c387888bc_c.jpgIMG_8134 by bc-chris, on Flickr

 

 

this was taken right after i got it home after having it repainted

 

http://8277987705_95285b1e0d_c.jpgIMG_1021 by bc-chris, on Flickr

 

IMG_2649.thumb.JPG.000daf55144e8e17d7e00706524d1f36.JPG

 

 

i also dropped in a digital dash from dakota digital.  i like what is in there now, but they've come out with a new version that i really really like and will get at some point...

IMG_2291.thumb.JPG.ca4375c967e107acf73195539cf67087.JPG

 

new version:

prd_ssh_2346_897.jpg.2e10818d84f43b012dfa3fa63d64c3b7.jpg

prd_zm_911.jpg.44717245f4f2649cb2b757a6220e0142.jpg

 

 

IMG_7352.thumb.JPG.49022170d6683631fd6aca1ed1e30ecd.JPG

 

also added an overhead console....  (uggghhh... i remember doing the install that day - it was pretty HOT!!!) 

 

console2.thumb.jpg.9221d6ae2ea184d4c45d45ccd9b36e83.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

WOW! That is Efng awesome. I especially love the hood! Great job. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Something else bc chris has we’ve not pointed out:   A very talented graphic designer.   Maybe it’s bc himself!

 

great stuff.  

  • 3 years later...
Posted
55 minutes ago, Sullpt said:

Mission accomplished. Custom designed Z71 logo.

 

 

F5523B8C-159D-4D98-8DB5-0532DB71F299.jpeg

Very cool!!!

 

Your work, or someone else?

Posted
1 hour ago, JimCost2014 said:

Very cool!!!

 

Your work, or someone else?

I did the design and had a shop stitch it for me. I'm having them do two more in dark red to match my Siren Red Tintcoat vehicle color.

  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Sullpt said:

I did the design and had a shop stitch it for me. I'm having them do two more in dark red to match my Siren Red Tintcoat vehicle color.

Looks great, wish they were not 3500 miles from me, would hit them up to do mine🤔😬

 

Post the Red ones when done, and the name of the shop, free advertising for them.

  • Like 2
  • 6 months later...
Posted

I'd love to have either Z71 or Trail Boss on the head rest...

 

I was talking to KatzKin leather the other day  and they are not authorized or something like that to do the Trail Boss...I'll have to ask about the Z71 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...