Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone know if 275/65 R20 Nitto Terra Grapplers will fit without rubbing on a 2015 Silverado 1500 LTZ on stock 20" wheels with a leveling kit?

Posted
38 minutes ago, Waaazooo said:

Yes


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

have you seen this set up? im looking at the RC 2.5 kit

Posted

Yes they will fit. 1 week ago I put 275/65/20 on my 1500 Sierra with no level. Looks and rides great. I actually bought a 2” level but don’t know if I’m going to install it now. 

 

Those will fit no no problem and no rub.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, freshstart12 said:

Yes they will fit. 1 week ago I put 275/65/20 on my 1500 Sierra with no level. Looks and rides great. I actually bought a 2” level but don’t know if I’m going to install it now. 

 

Those will fit no no problem and no rub.

Awesome...what tires did you go with? Any pics by any chance?

Posted

I went with scooper Discoverer AT/3’s my local shop said that’s what they sell the most of. I was in between those and the Nitto G2’s but the Coopers were about $100 cheaper for the set. They look great. I don’t have a full body shot just a close up of the tire. 

636E90DF-F12F-42AA-BEA2-10F6CDE03502.jpeg

Posted

How do you like those at3’s? How quiet are they?

Posted
have you seen this set up? im looking at the RC 2.5 kit

I did the RC 2” on my 1500. Nomrub wth BFG KO2


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
Does anyone know if 275/65 R20 Nitto Terra Grapplers will fit without rubbing on a 2015 Silverado 1500 LTZ on stock 20" wheels with a leveling kit?
Hey, I've got a rough country 2" level and 275/60/20 KO2's and I had to cut some of my felt out. 65s wouldn't fit at all so not too sure what these guys are saying.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

Posted
Hey, I've got a rough country 2" level and 275/60/20 KO2's and I had to cut some of my felt out. 65s wouldn't fit at all so not too sure what these guys are saying.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk


It’s really the offset of the wheel that will make or break the fitment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
37 minutes ago, Waaazooo said:


I did the RC 2” on my 1500. Nomrub wth BFG KO2


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And your running 275/65 R20?

Posted
And your running 275/65 R20?

I am. I had them on my 1500 and my current 2500. Fit with a 2” level on the 1500 and stock 2500zc9924b0f0a9251448fe41fe9fee471be.jpg0e3d3f807ed40a22edd0aa477c03beda.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)

It will fit fine. This is a 33/65/22 with a 2in level I just installed this afternoon.IMG_5824.thumb.JPG.bd21de0134d7922232064b9a6f98e0bb.JPG

Sorry the picture is sideways I just ran out in the rain to take it.

 

Aluminum 2in kit (don't buy composite rough ****-ry crap) 

Summit Performance ( http://amzn.to/2BlGNUI )

 

Video of the install. Literally takes less than 30 minutes if I am taking my time to do it.

The video is a full install of one side in 4 minutes (minus taking the wheel off)

 

Edited by carnau
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...