Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Installed a kenwood tm-v71a into the 2018 LTZ. I'm really happy with how it turned out.

 

Mounted the remote head in the card holder area. Did some trimming of the rubber insert to set in the head. Used the kenwood remote mount kit to stick the bracket to the console under the rubber card holder. Wires run under the console to under the passenger seat.

 

The radio is under the passenger seat. Power is supplied by direct connection to the battery.

 

I routed the mic cable through a hole I drilled in the access panel at the bottom of the console. The mic will be stowed in the console until I want to use it. Then I can pull it out and route the cable through the notch and close the console on it.

 

I also installed a remote speaker at the front of the passenger seat.

 

The antenna is mounted on a bracket I made that fits in the stake pocket. Wire runs in through the vent and makes it's way under the to the radio under the passenger seat.

 

Cheers!a19ed8dd3219ac2d1c8e1615db15c66c.jpg523bf4ae45e46850075022464750b7ec.jpg2f5b21a88a82c00a993ff6481dc5a802.jpg84150c66c4496be869e739f169c5575a.jpg361da1b71cf766679aac50228684ba9c.jpgc429921ad679950dd469d3aaddd02c4c.jpg479311fc17b1fe183050331b81044fda.jpga77dd731c242a07d3ffc70fd3277fb0f.jpg3e4669dc4e47df1e88f2c0c66a45d79d.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 4
  • 1 year later...
Posted

Looks like a  great install.  Since I have no clue about HAM radios, what is the purpose? Or is it related to your work? 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Looks like a  great install.  Since I have no clue about HAM radios, what is the purpose? Or is it related to your work? 
Just a form of communication. Works great when in remote areas that dont have cell service.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Posted
13 minutes ago, spiritwalker said:

Just a form of communication. Works great when in remote areas that dont have cell service.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

Got it..That's cool

Posted
On 3/29/2018 at 12:24 AM, spiritwalker said:

 

Installed a kenwood tm-v71a into the 2018 LTZ. I'm really happy with how it turned out.

 

Mounted the remote head in the card holder area. Did some trimming of the rubber insert to set in the head. Used the kenwood remote mount kit to stick the bracket to the console under the rubber card holder. Wires run under the console to under the passenger seat.

 

The radio is under the passenger seat. Power is supplied by direct connection to the battery.

 

I routed the mic cable through a hole I drilled in the access panel at the bottom of the console. The mic will be stowed in the console until I want to use it. Then I can pull it out and route the cable through the notch and close the console on it.

 

I also installed a remote speaker at the front of the passenger seat.

 

The antenna is mounted on a bracket I made that fits in the stake pocket. Wire runs in through the vent and makes it's way under the to the radio under the passenger seat.

 

Cheers!a19ed8dd3219ac2d1c8e1615db15c66c.jpg523bf4ae45e46850075022464750b7ec.jpg2f5b21a88a82c00a993ff6481dc5a802.jpg84150c66c4496be869e739f169c5575a.jpg361da1b71cf766679aac50228684ba9c.jpgc429921ad679950dd469d3aaddd02c4c.jpg479311fc17b1fe183050331b81044fda.jpga77dd731c242a07d3ffc70fd3277fb0f.jpg3e4669dc4e47df1e88f2c0c66a45d79d.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Beautiful install!  Im looking for ideas to install my 2m/44 in my 2019 Silverado. 

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 6/12/2019 at 12:09 PM, spiritwalker said:

Direct connect to the terminal.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

I found this post, because I'm getting ready to install the same radio (Kenwood TM-V71A) into my 2016 GMC Sierra. 

 

Did you connect both positive AND negative directly to the battery? If so, have you had any issues?

 

According to an article by Alan Applegate (K0BG) in the May 2015 issue of QST, as well as his website, he recommends NOT connecting the negative lead directly to the battery, because of the ELD (Electronic Load Detector). According to him, you should connect the negative wire to the transceiver to the common ground point, after the battery monitoring unit. I have not yet taken a look to see if my truck has such a thing, although I assume that it does. I'm planning to run power into the cab, with Anderson PowerPole connectors, so that later I can swap out the radio for something like an Icom IC-7100 if I want to add HF. 

 

For instance, see:  http://www.k0bg.com/wiring.html

Or check out the May 2015 issue of QST magazine from the ARRL archives. However, his website has much more detail than the short QST article. 

 

Thanks, MojoTexas (N5MAJ)

Posted
I found this post, because I'm getting ready to install the same radio (Kenwood TM-V71A) into my 2016 GMC Sierra. 
 
Did you connect both positive AND negative directly to the battery? If so, have you had any issues?
 
According to an article by Alan Applegate (K0BG) in the May 2015 issue of QST, as well as his website, he recommends NOT connecting the negative lead directly to the battery, because of the ELD (Electronic Load Detector). According to him, you should connect the negative wire to the transceiver to the common ground point, after the battery monitoring unit. I have not yet taken a look to see if my truck has such a thing, although I assume that it does. I'm planning to run power into the cab, with Anderson PowerPole connectors, so that later I can swap out the radio for something like an Icom IC-7100 if I want to add HF. 
 
For instance, see:  http://www.k0bg.com/wiring.html
Or check out the May 2015 issue of QST magazine from the ARRL archives. However, his website has much more detail than the short QST article. 
 
Thanks, MojoTexas (N5MAJ)
Direct connect to the battery terminals . Working great.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Posted

Nice clean install pictured above.
I had something similar with the same model radio in a 2006 Suburban.
I had + straight to the battery and - to a ground point under the hood near the relays for 10 years and no trouble.
I'm now looking for ideas to install that same radio in my 2017 Sierra W/T with center armrest / no center console.


Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, dplarson said:

Nice clean install pictured above.
I had something similar with the same model radio in a 2006 Suburban.
I had + straight to the battery and - to a ground point under the hood near the relays for 10 years and no trouble.
I'm now looking for ideas to install that same radio in my 2017 Sierra W/T with center armrest / no center console.


Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
 

 

I purchased a seat bolt mount from Lido Mounts, and it was delivered yesterday. 

 

However, I still haven't figured out how to mount it, since my 2016 Sierra has power seats. Once I get it all done, I will post a photo of my install. 

 

https://www.lidomounts.com/kenwood-ham-radio-mounts/LM-300-Kenwood.html

 

Posted

Say, I have one of those from a previous install in another car. That's a good idea! And I have a base model with no power seats. Thanks for the idea, I may just do that.

Now for the antenna. I'm tossing my mag mount and not looking back. I loved the through the roof NMO mount on my wagon but I'd never get into my garage with anything on the roof.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

  • 5 months later...
Posted

I found this post searching for how to mount an antenna in the bed of my 2019 Silverado. I like the way you mounted your antenna. Could you provide some info Or pictures on how you routed the antenna cable from inside the cab to the bed?

 

Thanks,

Joe, KC2YSI

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 981 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I usually do as well or better than the sticker for mileage. Usually better going west than east. North then South. Wind makes a difference. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist. But it did dawn on me I’m going by the vehicle calculation. Now that would be interesting.
    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
    • Glad you had success with it. I did as well, but about 5-6 months later it returned. Tried again, same result. This was after the dealer made several attempts and never even got it to slow down.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...