Jump to content

purchasing a new 2500 sierra


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/20/2018 at 12:22 PM, ewbldavis said:

Depending on just how much hauling you do, don't write of the 6.0L gasser. If you haul daily, get a diesel. If not, maybe look at the gas.

 

With the expense and the DEF/emissions garbage, I decided to stick with a gas engine. I tow a 34'/8500# travel trailer, and the gas engine has performed flawlessly. I've always loved diesels, but have not regretted getting a gasser instead. As a daily driver and the few trips we take, it's perfect.

yeah thats the thing. I don't have shit to haul. i just like the idea of having a diesel truck. But I'm definitley leaning more towards the 6.0. Since I can't justify spending another 8-11 bills on the diesel option. 

Posted

Go the 6.0 route.  i went the diesel route not really needing one but wanting to have one to enjoy, and it did cost me more $$$$ in the long run.  Would have been just as happy with a 6.0. 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Colossus said:

Go the 6.0 route.  i went the diesel route not really needing one but wanting to have one to enjoy, and it did cost me more $$$$ in the long run.  Would have been just as happy with a 6.0. 

appreciate that response.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

After owning a durabeast for years I told myself I would never return to gas. Not having anything to haul now, I couldn't justify the extra cash on a new diesel, so I bought a 6.0. I have been happy with the 6.0 other than the mpg, but there a days I miss my hopped up diesel. Next truck will be a diesel again.

Posted

If you are not towing or hauling - why go HD  - there are way more choices in the 1/2T and the 5.3L gets better MPG. Also with the new 2019's coming out there will be good deals on the 18's left on the lot. OR you can opt for one of those new Trail Boss or  the GMC version of it.

Posted
On 13/09/2018 at 11:21 PM, 2017HD said:

If you are not towing or hauling - why go HD  - there are way more choices in the 1/2T and the 5.3L gets better MPG. 

5.3 still not as rock solid as 6.0. HD's still made like a "real truck". If its going to do any real work the HD answer is simple.

Posted
On 9/14/2018 at 1:21 AM, 2017HD said:

If you are not towing or hauling - why go HD  - there are way more choices in the 1/2T and the 5.3L gets better MPG. Also with the new 2019's coming out there will be good deals on the 18's left on the lot. OR you can opt for one of those new Trail Boss or  the GMC version of it.

Basically I like the HD trucks better than their smaller counter parts. And in reference to the 19's; I'm waiting to find a great deal o the last bit of 18s floating around the area.

Posted
On 5/26/2018 at 9:07 PM, Big_Mike23 said:

whats up gang? Greetings from south Florida. I was recently in a car accident and my Suburban was totaled out. :-( bummer right? SO I'm thinking about going into the realm of heavy duty trucks and purchasing a 2500 Sierra. Leaning toward the 6.6 SLT. I've  been reading the forums and saw a couple of horror stories about trucks coming from the factory jacked up. So at the expense of those before me (thanks fellas)I want to try and avoid the issues that others made. Is there a general checklist one should use when purchasing a new truck from the factory diesel or gasser? thanks for the repsonses back!!!

FWIW, If you want the least expensive Chevy in South Florida, I bought an 18 2500 LTZ Midnight Duramax with every bell and whistle for $57k from Bomnin in Miami. Easy as anything else if you don't have a trade. They want to move vehicles. No connection other than I drove an hour to get there....Good luck.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Daver said:

FWIW, If you want the least expensive Chevy in South Florida, I bought an 18 2500 LTZ Midnight Duramax with every bell and whistle for $57k from Bomnin in Miami. Easy as anything else if you don't have a trade. They want to move vehicles. No connection other than I drove an hour to get there....Good luck.

 

Including 4x4?

Posted

Yep. They are the largest dealer in the Southeast and I guess they roll the dice that the volume/price mechanism works

in their favor. Granted, I hit all the incentives including GM finance. Have since re-financed and still ahead enough for my needs.

Posted
18 hours ago, Daver said:

FWIW, If you want the least expensive Chevy in South Florida, I bought an 18 2500 LTZ Midnight Duramax with every bell and whistle for $57k from Bomnin in Miami. Easy as anything else if you don't have a trade. They want to move vehicles. No connection other than I drove an hour to get there....Good luck.

 

ok. thanks for that little bit of info.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...