Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I may have screwed up. I purchased my 16' silverado 1500 crew cab 4x4 with the intent of pulling a rockwood 2509s. I saw the truck was rated at 9100lb, the TT was 6869 GVWR and pulled the trigger. What I did not take into consideration of, was factoring the tongue weight of the trailer into the 7200LB gvwr of the truck. I put the truck on the scale yesterday, and it came in at 5900lb. TT has a tongue weight of 694lb.  Once I factor in my passengers, I have 160lbs of payload left on the trucks GVWR of 7200. Do you guys think I'm over thinking all of this, or cutting it too close for comfort on the GVWR of the truck? 

Posted

Over thinking it.  You're fine

 

I tow a KZ MXT 301 toy hauler all the time with a GVWR of 8800lbs and have no issues.  I put everything possible in the trailer and usually towards the back.  I'd rather pull heavy then have added weight in the truck.

Posted

OK to me.

IMO stopping will be the issue.

Take your time.

 

:)

 

Posted

I did the math on a similar trailer with my '15 Sierra V6 with a 7,000 lb tow rating.  I know I would be fine so you'll be more than fine!  As said earlier, get a proper weight distribution/anti sway hitch and enjoy.  I currently pull a Winnebago 2108ds rated at 7,000 lbs gross weight however it is only 3900 lbs dry.  This setup is not challenging for my truck and I wish I had purchased a larger trailer!

Posted

First year I bought a cheap weight distribution hitch from amazon. It was ok and did the job. Felt clunky and noisy as hell. Plus it needed to be greased multiple times. So next year I bout a Reese Strait Line and oh my god. Butter baby.  It’s amazing how much of a difference it makes. The once you experience it; you really appreciate the value.

Posted

Hate to be a counterpoint here but I was in the same boat as you.  I bought a '17 1500 5.3l thinking I wouldn't have any issues pulling our 7250lb GVWR Jayco trailer.  I traded it in on a '18 2500 gasser.  Was barely under the max payload on the 1500 but it worked too hard in my opinion on the mountain passes here in the Northwest and even with the trailer brakes and my WDH dialed I always felt on edge.  

 

With the 2500, I don't sweat how much I have in the bed of the truck or where exactly the load is in the trailer anymore.  It probably is the placebo effect but I arrive more rested and less stressed.

 

There are some issues with the 2500 though.  I thankfully have a short commute but the gas mileage sucks, I get 12-13 mpg not towing and around 8 mpg with the trailer. 

 

Overall it all to me it came down to how much I was going to be towing the trailer, did I feel comfortable pushing the limits of my 1500 and how stressed after towing the trailer was I when I got to the place we were camping? I do not regret my decision.

 

If we lived somewhere flatter I would have kept the 1500 I think though.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, mammut said:

Hate to be a counterpoint here but I was in the same boat as you.  I bought a '17 1500 5.3l thinking I wouldn't have any issues pulling our 7250lb GVWR Jayco trailer.  I traded it in on a '18 2500 gasser.  Was barely under the max payload on the 1500 but it worked too hard in my opinion on the mountain passes here in the Northwest and even with the trailer brakes and my WDH dialed I always felt on edge.  

 

With the 2500, I don't sweat how much I have in the bed of the truck or where exactly the load is in the trailer anymore.  It probably is the placebo effect but I arrive more rested and less stressed.

 

There are some issues with the 2500 though.  I thankfully have a short commute but the gas mileage sucks, I get 12-13 mpg not towing and around 8 mpg with the trailer. 

 

Overall it all to me it came down to how much I was going to be towing the trailer, did I feel comfortable pushing the limits of my 1500 and how stressed after towing the trailer was I when I got to the place we were camping? I do not regret my decision.

 

If we lived somewhere flatter I would have kept the 1500 I think though.

 

I'm thinking I should have gone this route as well. One thing I did not take into consideration when purchasing the 1500, was how little payload the truck actually had, and how easy it is to get over the 7200 GVWR of the truck. I weighed the truck and was surprised to see it come in at 5900. Leaving a mere 1300 lbs for tongue weight, passengers and cargo. 

Posted
I may have screwed up. I purchased my 16' silverado 1500 crew cab 4x4 with the intent of pulling a rockwood 2509s. I saw the truck was rated at 9100lb, the TT was 6869 GVWR and pulled the trigger. What I did not take into consideration of, was factoring the tongue weight of the trailer into the 7200LB gvwr of the truck. I put the truck on the scale yesterday, and it came in at 5900lb. TT has a tongue weight of 694lb.  Once I factor in my passengers, I have 160lbs of payload left on the trucks GVWR of 7200. Do you guys think I'm over thinking all of this, or cutting it too close for comfort on the GVWR of the truck? 
I have the same trailer and pull with '10 silverado. My only issue is power.
Handeling and stopping is fine after i re did the wt hitch, dealer didnt do it right. I am mindful with what i put in the truck bed when loaded. Probably near the max payload with 2 adults and 3 small kids, minimum stuff in bed.

We went from twin cities to black hills last summer, only real issue was headwinds and older 5.3l. Engine temp would spike on longer hills.

I will be getting a different truck next yr, sticking with 1500.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, scale obsession said:

I'm thinking I should have gone this route as well. One thing I did not take into consideration when purchasing the 1500, was how little payload the truck actually had, and how easy it is to get over the 7200 GVWR of the truck. I weighed the truck and was surprised to see it come in at 5900. Leaving a mere 1300 lbs for tongue weight, passengers and cargo. 

The GVWR on these trucks is a ball park.  Its simply there to classify the trucks as 1/2, 3/4 and 1 ton.  Tow ratings are usually conservative.  You can go to youtube and watch vid after vid of people doing tests to see how much a particular truck can tow and usually its several thousand pounds over its capacity.  If you go a few hundred lbs over the gvwr you're not gonna blow out your tires or snap an axle.  Again I think you're over thinking it. 

Posted

Like mentioned above, you have plenty of spare capacity in the trailer weight so load it not the truck and it should be good.

 

This is why I went with the max tow package. I was planning on a travel trailer and the 1300-1500 payloads were really close on the standard 1500s. I have 1900lbs payload but still have the 1500 for my daily driver.

 

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, scale obsession said:

I'm thinking I should have gone this route as well. One thing I did not take into consideration when purchasing the 1500, was how little payload the truck actually had, and how easy it is to get over the 7200 GVWR of the truck. I weighed the truck and was surprised to see it come in at 5900. Leaving a mere 1300 lbs for tongue weight, passengers and cargo. 

You are well within your maximum limits. Proper loading, proper hitch and common sense are required.  The weight class of trailer you are looking at is targeted to 1/2 ton truck owners.  If you've never towed a TT your first experience may be a little intimidating.  Your truck will be working (like it's designed to do) but after a couple of short trips you'll be having to remind yourself that you are pulling a trailer!

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Donstar said:

You are well within your maximum limits. Proper loading, proper hitch and common sense are required.  The weight class of trailer you are looking at is targeted to 1/2 ton truck owners.  If you've never towed a TT your first experience may be a little intimidating.  Your truck will be working (like it's designed to do) but after a couple of short trips you'll be having to remind yourself that you are pulling a trailer!

 

technically, once I subtract 500lb for passengers and 694lb for tongue weight, there isn't much left. While I'm probably playing on the edge of extra conservative, I would hate to get into the mountains and have issues. 

Posted
technically, once I subtract 500lb for passengers and 694lb for tongue weight, there isn't much left. While I'm probably playing on the edge of extra conservative, I would hate to get into the mountains and have issues. 
You will be fine.
I also found inflating tires to near max psi was noticeable (better) in how it handled loaded with trailer.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Posted
24 minutes ago, scale obsession said:

technically, once I subtract 500lb for passengers and 694lb for tongue weight, there isn't much left. While I'm probably playing on the edge of extra conservative, I would hate to get into the mountains and have issues. 

You will not be short of power.  You are right in doing the math for payload etc. but you will have more than ample horsepower!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,949
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Gkistler
    Newest Member
    Gkistler
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 716 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hi friends - first time poster. I have a 2015 sierra Denali with 150k miles, I’m the second owner and she’s given me 75k of great service. I run a pulse AFM disable device. Starting Thursday when I exited the freeway after a short local ride it started idling rough, with an obvious misfire shake and was down on low end power.  I got it home and hooked it up to my scannner and found no codes but in live data a pretty bad misfire on cylinder 5. I replaced the coil, plug and wire with all new OE replacements (Delphi gn10165 coil, acdelco wire and 41-168 plug). It’s still behaving the same way after firing the parts cannon at it.   I know cyl 5 is a non AFM cylinder so I am not thinking this is AFM related but I’m kinda at a loss. injector? Bent pushrod? It’s running too well over 1k rpm to suggest those IMO. Has anyone chase this issue before and what was it? Any suggestions? 
    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...