Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 4/24/2019 at 10:04 PM, destrada127 said:

5k miles here too on my AT4 and I've had no issues whatsoever6678ceb6aa5bbd0592e73b1e71ad0f4a.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

What size wheel/tire are you running and what type of front bumper is that?

Posted
What size wheel/tire are you running and what type of front bumper is that?
That is an old pic. I was running 35/12.50r20 in that pic but now I'm on 37/13.50 on 20x9 -12 on 4"rough country lift. The bumper is addictive desert designs stealth fighter15d1c9aff2c6567e3197c6f52f1802a8.jpgd059a87e695085c804f2be1da63f131e.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted

After a thousand miles with the Readylift 1.5” leveling kit, I’ve noticed noise on my drivers side at low speed. It sounds like a knock. It doesn’t happen every time, but enough to be concerned.

Posted
13 hours ago, Fojtska said:

After a thousand miles with the Readylift 1.5” leveling kit, I’ve noticed noise on my drivers side at low speed. It sounds like a knock. It doesn’t happen every time, but enough to be concerned.

is it during rolling, dips, or bumps....  a little more details.   Maybe loose strut mount hardware, either upper or lower.  Not to much is messed with during install so tracking down issue should be easy, unless kit caused new problem.  

Posted

I have approx 10,000 KM's on my 1.5" leveling kit. (6,213 Miles)

2019 AT4

No issues at all. No sounds, no creeks, no issues.

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Taz56 said:

I have approx 10,000 KM's on my 1.5" leveling kit. (6,213 Miles)

2019 AT4

No issues at all. No sounds, no creeks, no issues.

 

What kit did you use?  My AT4 is currently at the shop having Fabtech 1.5" installed. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, KillerOfMillers said:

What kit did you use?  My AT4 is currently at the shop having Fabtech 1.5" installed. 

I'll have to look up the paperwork when I get home tonight. I don't remember. 

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I bought the truck new from the dealer with 285 65 20s on it.   Not sure what parts they used but the service rep told me they used a spacer up front.  I measured the front and rear heights one time.  If my memory recalls there is about and more height in the rear.  I'm not a mechanic so I don't know what that translates too.  Screenshot_20200203-110448.thumb.png.48f5743b49b7609262905081d266b559.pngHere is a pic.  

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, RLCC said:

What tires did it come with

NITTO Ridge grapplers03509774-0F15-4672-BE23-665197ED162B.thumb.jpeg.eb32a5232a785371fe3fd7c636fffe98.jpeg

 

  • Like 1
  • 7 months later...
  • 1 year later...
Posted

Hi when you add the leveling kit will 20x10 wheels fit pretty good with no hitting the mud flaps. I have a 2021 at4 and bought 20x10 fuel wheels with a 285 5520 tire not that big but it still hits the flaps. It’s annoying. I wanted a bigger tire but if these hit. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...