Jump to content

Backup camera comes on when fog lights switch on


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, jonesalexryan said:

I contacted my dealers service manager and hes out today but is going to get back to me tomorrow with what exactly they did to fix mine the first time, ill let you know what they come back with but if you can get yours to happen again or if it gets worse try toggling the running lights on and off as my problem doesnt exist if the running lights are off. 

Turn on lights it comes on.

Hit fog lights only and it comes on .

It's in the running light circuit.

Here's a pic I took this morning.

IMG_20200212_094221.jpg

Posted

If you can get it to stay that way, leave the running lights on while in park and pull the fuse for the drivers side and see if it stops. that way you can isolate it weather its left or right side. 

 

This is the junction box i found the corosion in. The second plug in from the left is the drivers tail light (yellow tape) and the one to the right of that is the passengers. I believe they replaced the drivers harness from here right to the bulbs last time to fix the problem. 

 

IMG_2045.thumb.jpg.b1294af2db9e27be55ec71fca61e0efa.jpg

Posted

Well. It bothered me enough that I had to get to the bottom of it. A few things to note. I have led reverse bulbs and I have tie ins to both the running light and the reverse light wire feeds on this harness and thought that one of these things were to blame. After turning the key all the way ahead and turning the lights on I cut apart the factory harness until I could isolate what it was that was causing the back feed from the running light circuit to the reverse light circuit. 
 

loe and behold I got all the way back to the plug mentioned above and cut the wires off about 2” from the plug and plugged it back in and I STILL had the problem but if I unplugged it my problem went away. So I took apart the female (tail light harness) side of the plug and found that the brown wire (running lights) sits next to the light green wire (reverse lights) and somehow even though I had di-electric grease in the connector, water got in and caused the short between the two pins. (We’ve had a lot of freeze thaw here in eastern Canada in the last week maybe forced itself in?)
 

In summary I cut up a perfectly good harness to find out that I could have fixed all my problems with a can of compressed air or a blow gun from an air compressor. 
 

hope this helps someone in the future. 5BAEB3E5-85D3-42F9-A622-280D552B89E6.thumb.jpeg.8297c1dfe1f51de7171ecf23f3a8b2aa.jpeg

Posted

 

15 hours ago, jonesalexryan said:

In summary I cut up a perfectly good harness to find out that I could have fixed all my problems with a can of compressed air or a blow gun from an air compressor. 

hope this helps someone in the future. 

I just read on another thread about a member replacing his windshield wiper switch and motor in an attempt to rectify a problem.  The issue wasn't resolved.   I once replaced a truck's engine to give me a fresh start.  It didn't solve anything!   We all have/will make expensive mistakes in an effort to do it ourselves or save money.  These head slappers make our successes feel so much better!  Thank you for sharing your experience!

  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 2/12/2020 at 9:17 AM, dieselfan1 said:

Turn on lights it comes on.

Hit fog lights only and it comes on .

It's in the running light circuit.

Here's a pic I took this morning.

IMG_20200212_094221.jpg

Have you figured it out?

 

Have you done any BCM mods (diodes)?

 

Did your fogs actually come on?

Posted
Have you figured it out?

 

Have you done any BCM mods (diodes)?

 

Did your fogs actually come on?

No mods. This is not supposed to happen but hasn't happened since this pic.

Took to dealer they couldn't find anything wrong. Fog's were on.

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...