Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Make sure your under GVWR, your tires are up to the task, and you have the right license. Your not going to have any problems unless you kill someone in a crash. Might need some airbags.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I've recently been trying to find a 5th wheel camper trailer for my 2019 Silverado 2500HD 4x4 with a 6.6L Duramax Diesel.  After much research, I'm finding as others that I can basically only pull maybe an Ultra-lite camper.  All this calculations are to be legal per DOT wherever I drive.  Any input to these factors that could change what information that I have would be grateful!

 

I have a tow package, 20 inch tires, and a goose-neck hitch.  I plan on adding a Andersen hitch for my 5th wheel.  My GVWR  is 10,000 lbs,  GAWR FRT is 5200 lbs. and GAWR REAR is 6200 lbs. per the sticker on the inside of the door.  The payload of my truck is 2115 lbs.  My Max trailer weight per the Duramax Supplement manual is 13,500 lbs, thus giving me a combined  GCWR of 23,500 lbs. 

 

Recently, I took my truck to a CAT scale with the following results with no trailer, Axel Weight Front: 5080 lbs,  Axel weight rear 3460, and combined GWT of 8540 lbs.   This leaves me a total weight of 1460 lbs. (1415 lbs., after hitch installed) that can be added to my truck for 5th wheel or conventional tow and not to exceed the GVWR of 10,000 lbs.  Something I learned about the Payload weight is that you must deduct the weight of anything in the vehicle such as driver, passengers, tools, pets, etc. from the vehicle when calculating your payload weight.  Also, per my dealership, the pin wight of a fifth wheel can be up to 10% - 25% of GVWR of trailer and the only way to find out whether you are legal or not is to CAT scale the vehicle and trailer.  

 

Just thought the info may be helpful!

Posted
I've recently been trying to find a 5th wheel camper trailer for my 2019 Silverado 2500HD 4x4 with a 6.6L Duramax Diesel.  After much research, I'm finding as others that I can basically only pull maybe an Ultra-lite camper.  All this calculations are to be legal per DOT wherever I drive.  Any input to these factors that could change what information that I have would be grateful!
 
I have a tow package, 20 inch tires, and a goose-neck hitch.  I plan on adding a Andersen hitch for my 5th wheel.  My GVWR  is 10,000 lbs,  GAWR FRT is 5200 lbs. and GAWR REAR is 6200 lbs. per the sticker on the inside of the door.  The payload of my truck is 2115 lbs.  My Max trailer weight per the Duramax Supplement manual is 13,500 lbs, thus giving me a combined  GCWR of 23,500 lbs. 
 
Recently, I took my truck to a CAT scale with the following results with no trailer, Axel Weight Front: 5080 lbs,  Axel weight rear 3460, and combined GWT of 8540 lbs.   This leaves me a total weight of 1460 lbs. (1415 lbs., after hitch installed) that can be added to my truck for 5th wheel or conventional tow and not to exceed the GVWR of 10,000 lbs.  Something I learned about the Payload weight is that you must deduct the weight of anything in the vehicle such as driver, passengers, tools, pets, etc. from the vehicle when calculating your payload weight.  Also, per my dealership, the pin wight of a fifth wheel can be up to 10% - 25% of GVWR of trailer and the only way to find out whether you are legal or not is to CAT scale the vehicle and trailer.  
 
Just thought the info may be helpful!

Take that spare tire and put it in the trailer. That will give you an additional 60-80lbs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
Thank you!  Great idea! [emoji1306]

Not sure where you keep your LP tanks? I’ve seen a few people with bumper tow trailers with their tanks storage empty. I assumed that they put them in the coach for less tongue weight.

I’ve only known one person who was flagged down for weights in their RV. He had a 5th wheel on a ram 1500. If you’re over a few hundred pounds I don’t think it’s a real issue. If you’re over by 1000-1500 lbs then you need to rethink your toe strategy. I am like you where I want to reduce my liability with weights and regulation. My spare is in the trailer with the tools and spare crap. I am considering going back to stock wheels and tires because 35” and 20x9 wheels are heavy and unnecessary for towing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
On 9/15/2020 at 4:13 AM, alm5698 said:

I've recently been trying to find a 5th wheel camper trailer for my 2019 Silverado 2500HD 4x4 with a 6.6L Duramax Diesel.  After much research, I'm finding as others that I can basically only pull maybe an Ultra-lite camper.  All this calculations are to be legal per DOT wherever I drive.  Any input to these factors that could change what information that I have would be grateful!

 

I have a tow package, 20 inch tires, and a goose-neck hitch.  I plan on adding a Andersen hitch for my 5th wheel.  My GVWR  is 10,000 lbs,  GAWR FRT is 5200 lbs. and GAWR REAR is 6200 lbs. per the sticker on the inside of the door.  The payload of my truck is 2115 lbs.  My Max trailer weight per the Duramax Supplement manual is 13,500 lbs, thus giving me a combined  GCWR of 23,500 lbs. 

 

Recently, I took my truck to a CAT scale with the following results with no trailer, Axel Weight Front: 5080 lbs,  Axel weight rear 3460, and combined GWT of 8540 lbs.   This leaves me a total weight of 1460 lbs. (1415 lbs., after hitch installed) that can be added to my truck for 5th wheel or conventional tow and not to exceed the GVWR of 10,000 lbs.  Something I learned about the Payload weight is that you must deduct the weight of anything in the vehicle such as driver, passengers, tools, pets, etc. from the vehicle when calculating your payload weight.  Also, per my dealership, the pin wight of a fifth wheel can be up to 10% - 25% of GVWR of trailer and the only way to find out whether you are legal or not is to CAT scale the vehicle and trailer.  

 

Just thought the info may be helpful!

 

 

The 20"s are what hurt your payload.  The load index is 121 vs the stock 18" size that has 124 load index tires.  Trucks with 18" wheel/tire from the factory have higher payload on the door tags.  This is also why 1 tons only came with 18" wheels 2011-2019.  

Posted
 
 
The 20"s are what hurt your payload.  The load index is 121 vs the stock 18" size that has 124 load index tires.  Trucks with 18" wheel/tire from the factory have higher payload on the door tags.  This is also why 1 tons only came with 18" wheels 2011-2019.  

I think he is only talking about broad weight limits.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I’m referring mainly to GVWR and the Payload rating.  With a couple things moved around, I can get the payload capacity closer to the sticker. 

Posted

It's not the 20's, it's the diesel...

 

You really can't tow a decently sized 5th wheel with a diesel 2500 - not enough payload. Now the 2020 trucks are a little different because they have a higher GVWR and much better payload when properly equipped.

 

My gas Denali only has a GVWR of 9500#, but my payload is 2560# - 400# more that the higher GVWR/Diesel. 

 

Also depends on 5er model - our Cougar 32BHS has a lighter pin weight of 1570#, so were good with stuff/gas and payload.

  • Like 1
Posted
It's not the 20's, it's the diesel...
 
You really can't tow a decently sized 5th wheel with a diesel 2500 - not enough payload. Now the 2020 trucks are a little different because they have a higher GVWR and much better payload when properly equipped.
 
My gas Denali only has a GVWR of 9500#, but my payload is 2560# - 400# more that the higher GVWR/Diesel. 
 
Also depends on 5er model - our Cougar 32BHS has a lighter pin weight of 1570#, so were good with stuff/gas and payload.

I thought all 2500’s had a 10k lb gvwr I agree about the 2500. They are almost there... but not really


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Some things never change.
My 03 Chevy 2500 HD LT ext.cab long bed Duramax had a payload of 1680. Sad.
I also had a 01 Chevy 2500HD LS single cab long bed 6.0 gasser that had a payload of 3300. That was a stout truck.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...