Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, HoosierZ said:

Over the weekend, I ran a can of CRC GDI valve cleaner thru my intake and it most definitely made the engine more responsive. I’ve had a catch can on my 2016 5.3L since around 5k mi and it just turned over 60k. I sprayed the cleaner through the line between the catch can and intake so the cleaner would take the same route as the PCV vapors do. 

Would make sure to change the oil asap, that stuff gets past everything. I used a little on my cleaning exercise directly. The oil was absolutely filthy after the cleaning. Can dilute the oil...

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Here's my take on a can for whatever it is worth. My truck uses no measurable amount of oil between 5K OCI's and I use a lube with a NOACK under 6%. A can doesn't really make sense in this case. 

 

My wife's SUV uses a quart in 10K or about 8 ounces between 2,500 mile OCI's. That's how often I have to change it to keep the rings free.  

 

This one I would put a can on IF it had an external PCV system...which it does not. 2.4 Ecotec I4 is internal and uses a sized orifice instead of a valve. Really dumb design but point is...it uses enough oil to be a problem as I showed in an earlier post photo. And it consumes it via the intake manifold as that photo shows.

 

One of these days I might just plug that orifice and tap the cam cover and manifold for an external system I can trap. 

 

That can would also be much larger that any commercial can I've seen to date. Most efficient ones I've seen are fabricated for race car systems and are about a 2 liters in size minimum. Some cans over a gallon.   

 

 

 

 

Would agree it needs to be larger and have some type of trap/filter something to be more effective. What the small ones on the vettes/camaros actually accomplishes would be really surprising if it does anything meaningful.  I've heard that same info about the DI ecotec (2.4) that they have a deficient PVC system, especially for performance applications.

 

Anyhow, the whole exercise here is just another data point. Don't know that I'm going to change anything about my program, I don't know with certainty what to change to get a better result. And to me a better result would be keeping the intake tract clean.

 

Another thing about the CDI cleaner if used the way they intend you too. You will inadvertently wash a bunch of garbage into your cylinders, some of it is on the harder side. If I did use a liquid chemical induction cleaner I would change the oil  within the 1st 100mi. for sure.

Posted
1 hour ago, kennerz said:

Would make sure to change the oil asap, that stuff gets past everything. I used a little on my cleaning exercise directly. The oil was absolutely filthy after the cleaning. Can dilute the oil...

 

The truck was due for an oil, so I changed it when I got back from driving it after the treatment. The can actually says to use the cleaner before every oil change. That seems excessive. 

Posted
14 hours ago, kennerz said:

Would make sure to change the oil asap, that stuff gets past everything. I used a little on my cleaning exercise directly. The oil was absolutely filthy after the cleaning. Can dilute the oil...

 

Yep. I've used it twice now and as you mentioned, just before I'm changing the oil. Get it out asap and in with fresh. I'm not saying that stuff doesn't work... I'm sure it does to some degree. I don't believe it gets to all the ports effectively however.

 

That said, my next rodeo is to take the intake manifold off again sometime soon and clean the valves. I'll start with soaking with CRC and then cleaning and depending on the results may go ahead and walnut blast.

Posted

has anyone tried locking out the VVT solenoid on the cam and disabling the Vtec  in the software?  then do a long term intake-valve test with NO catch can.  could the oil deposits be coming from inside the combustion chamber pushing oil mist back up into the intake, during V4 DoD and the cams Vtec cycling events?

Posted
6 hours ago, pokismoki said:

has anyone tried locking out the VVT solenoid on the cam and disabling the Vtec  in the software?  then do a long term intake-valve test with NO catch can.  could the oil deposits be coming from inside the combustion chamber pushing oil mist back up into the intake, during V4 DoD and the cams Vtec cycling events?

It's how passive EGR works sir. 😉 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/11/2021 at 4:28 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

It's how passive EGR works sir. 😉 

I wonder where in the ECM's file I could find and Disable the passive EGR  function? I'll have to call a tuner shop if no one on here knows...

Posted
36 minutes ago, pokismoki said:

I wonder where in the ECM's file I could find and Disable the passive EGR  function? I'll have to call a tuner shop if no one on here knows...

Might want to ask what EGR does in a gasoline motor. Not the same thing it does in a diesel. It isn't there for Nox reduction. It's there to keep the cats alive. Heat management. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/14/2021 at 8:59 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

Might want to ask what EGR does in a gasoline motor. Not the same thing it does in a diesel. It isn't there for Nox reduction. It's there to keep the cats alive. Heat management. 

i thought the cats where cooled during over temp, by the ecu dumping fuel into the motor?

Posted
1 hour ago, pokismoki said:

i thought the cats where cooled during over temp, by the ecu dumping fuel into the motor?

Fuel to cool. I haven't heard that one in a few decades. Honestly I don't know how it responds to an "over' temp.

 

EGR 'moderates' the heat during normal operation. Remember the fire triangle? Heat, fuel, oxygen. (chemical reaction)  

  • Like 1
Posted

i never datalogged it to see if its true, just stuff heard on HPT forum, not sure those guys know what they're talking 'bout either sometimes

2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Fuel to cool. I haven't heard that one in a few decades. Honestly I don't know how it responds to an "over' temp.

 

EGR 'moderates' the heat during normal operation. Remember the fire triangle? Heat, fuel, oxygen. (chemical reaction)  

 

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, pokismoki said:

i never datalogged it to see if its true, just stuff heard on HPT forum, not sure those guys know what they're talking 'bout either sometimes

 

It would be interesting to know wouldn't it? There have been allot of different strategies employed over the decades. Has to be the right mix and at the right cat temperature. The difference in complexity between pretty darn good and zero is nuts. 

 

I won't leave these up for very long as they fill up my attachments limits. 

 

Exhaust & Emissions

 

image.jpeg.20a5e3f7347ffa31d07619224e349223.jpeg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,728
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Disabled Mike
    Newest Member
    Disabled Mike
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 719 Guests (See full list)


×
×
  • Create New...