Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Figure for everyone wondering what your intake valves will look like after 78k miles with no catch can, full synthetic oil changes every 5k and only premium fuel used.. see below. Motor was torn down for AFM lifter failure.

IMG_4397.JPG

Posted
1 minute ago, JLaw297 said:

Figure for everyone wondering what your intake valves will look like after 78k miles with no catch can, full synthetic oil changes every 5k and only premium fuel used.. see below. Motor was torn down for AFM lifter failure.

IMG_4397.JPG

Interesting.  I was kicking myself the other day for not having them take pictures of my intake valves when they did my AFM lifter replacement a couple months ago.  I'm pretty sure it's the cause of my (very slowly)  increasingly rough idle.

Posted

Same with my idle. I wish they had sent me a pic upon tear down so I could have had the heads sent somewhere to be walnut blasted before it was put back together.

Posted

Got to love DI.  I wonder if a regular treatment of the spray can CRC valve cleaner make any difference or would that happen eventually anyways?  That's pretty nasty looking for only 78K miles.   

Posted (edited)

Ummm that doesn’t look bad at all

 

its black and nasty looking but as far as Actual buildup not that bad

Edited by truckguy82
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Wow, that looks pretty bad. Only 78k miles? I've seen some other pictures on here and they look bad too. 

 

I do 5,00 mile oil changes too...and run a catch can. When I reach 70k miles I'm planning on pulling the intake off and doing a manual cleaning...wondering how it'll look (not sure how much help the catch can is actually giving). 

Posted
2 hours ago, truckguy82 said:

Ummm that doesn’t look bad at all

 

its black and nasty looking but as far as Actual buildup not that bad

Was thinking the same, not great but not awful.  Doubt that is causing any issues at all.

Posted

uless your loosing MPG's i wouldn't bother tearing the manifold off, your better off finding a private BMW shop that does walnut blasting and let them clean it correctly. or you guys can buy the vacuum blasting tool online, and get a 50lb bag of crushed walnuuts. and blow the weekend cleaning the valves.

Posted
10 hours ago, NomadicCPO said:

Was thinking the same, not great but not awful.  Doubt that is causing any issues at all.

+1

 

Not great but I've seen a lot worse. Either way, while you have the opportunity get it cleaned up JL!

Posted

Obviously, pulling port fuel injected heads would most likely reveal something that looked brand new with a few specs.  This is most likely gonna happen regardless and unfortunately quicker on GDI's and has nothing to do with OCI intervals at all.  Is it bad?  It's not great but it's not gonna do anything for your ownership life expectancy.  We all be coking.....................

Posted

That isn't bad if you ask me.  This is what I would call bad, picture of BMW valves. Before and after cleaning.

 

 

n54-valve-carbon-17076613_767005956788490_9148968870982189056_n.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Jacoby said:

Those look horrible

Carbon buildup from di has been known to cut out like 25-30% of hp

 

while it looks bad compared to port injection, it looks fantastic for di. Probably losing like 5-10hp tops.

 

his is the worst ive seen for the lt motors, and its really not that bad

Posted (edited)

could also just install  hydro boost from a 2500 in place of the vac pump,  delete vac pump lines, and run breather filters on your valve covers.. problem would stop there..

Edited by flyingfool
Posted

Nasty. Now we know why Ford used their noodles and did DI + Port Injection. First time I thought I would ever give Ford credit over GM in the engine/powertrain department but in this instance they won and GM looks like the dummy. Trade them in before warranty is out. Motto of new vehicles beyond the year 2001. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
    • you might read through the info on gmupfitter.com for your truck, to find a good power source.
    • Melling I believe is/was the OEM on the lifters who explored this problem some years ago. The white paper they generated on the topic indicated two items of note when I read it. 1.) They only fail on the switch. Prevent the switch, prevent the failure. 2.) The majority fail due to deposits messing up the timing of that switch. Anyway that's what I got from it.    Mine have always been active, 195K+ now, and my oil maintenance is surgically clean.    Of course this assumes good parts. That is no heat treat issue or machining flaws. I get comfortable that these issues are in the rearview mirror by about 30K. IMHO naturally. 
    • Yes, the key seems to be with the half tons that if it has the Z71, then it definitely has the two speed. What got me was that the two speed AND the lower geared towing package option could not be chosen together the last few years unless it was mated up to the 6.2. Want the 3.0 duramax and 3.73 tow gears ... nope, can't get the two speed transfer case ( neighbor son realized that after he had bought his used 3.0 half ton .. where the frick is the low range ? ! ).    I am still unsure which truck series, the half ton or the HD truck that the original poster is referring to for sure other than yes his question is in the HD section of this forum but that doesn't guarantee the question got asked in the right section.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...