Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, HoosierZ said:

Over the weekend, I ran a can of CRC GDI valve cleaner thru my intake and it most definitely made the engine more responsive. I’ve had a catch can on my 2016 5.3L since around 5k mi and it just turned over 60k. I sprayed the cleaner through the line between the catch can and intake so the cleaner would take the same route as the PCV vapors do. 

Would make sure to change the oil asap, that stuff gets past everything. I used a little on my cleaning exercise directly. The oil was absolutely filthy after the cleaning. Can dilute the oil...

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Here's my take on a can for whatever it is worth. My truck uses no measurable amount of oil between 5K OCI's and I use a lube with a NOACK under 6%. A can doesn't really make sense in this case. 

 

My wife's SUV uses a quart in 10K or about 8 ounces between 2,500 mile OCI's. That's how often I have to change it to keep the rings free.  

 

This one I would put a can on IF it had an external PCV system...which it does not. 2.4 Ecotec I4 is internal and uses a sized orifice instead of a valve. Really dumb design but point is...it uses enough oil to be a problem as I showed in an earlier post photo. And it consumes it via the intake manifold as that photo shows.

 

One of these days I might just plug that orifice and tap the cam cover and manifold for an external system I can trap. 

 

That can would also be much larger that any commercial can I've seen to date. Most efficient ones I've seen are fabricated for race car systems and are about a 2 liters in size minimum. Some cans over a gallon.   

 

 

 

 

Would agree it needs to be larger and have some type of trap/filter something to be more effective. What the small ones on the vettes/camaros actually accomplishes would be really surprising if it does anything meaningful.  I've heard that same info about the DI ecotec (2.4) that they have a deficient PVC system, especially for performance applications.

 

Anyhow, the whole exercise here is just another data point. Don't know that I'm going to change anything about my program, I don't know with certainty what to change to get a better result. And to me a better result would be keeping the intake tract clean.

 

Another thing about the CDI cleaner if used the way they intend you too. You will inadvertently wash a bunch of garbage into your cylinders, some of it is on the harder side. If I did use a liquid chemical induction cleaner I would change the oil  within the 1st 100mi. for sure.

Posted
1 hour ago, kennerz said:

Would make sure to change the oil asap, that stuff gets past everything. I used a little on my cleaning exercise directly. The oil was absolutely filthy after the cleaning. Can dilute the oil...

 

The truck was due for an oil, so I changed it when I got back from driving it after the treatment. The can actually says to use the cleaner before every oil change. That seems excessive. 

Posted
14 hours ago, kennerz said:

Would make sure to change the oil asap, that stuff gets past everything. I used a little on my cleaning exercise directly. The oil was absolutely filthy after the cleaning. Can dilute the oil...

 

Yep. I've used it twice now and as you mentioned, just before I'm changing the oil. Get it out asap and in with fresh. I'm not saying that stuff doesn't work... I'm sure it does to some degree. I don't believe it gets to all the ports effectively however.

 

That said, my next rodeo is to take the intake manifold off again sometime soon and clean the valves. I'll start with soaking with CRC and then cleaning and depending on the results may go ahead and walnut blast.

Posted

has anyone tried locking out the VVT solenoid on the cam and disabling the Vtec  in the software?  then do a long term intake-valve test with NO catch can.  could the oil deposits be coming from inside the combustion chamber pushing oil mist back up into the intake, during V4 DoD and the cams Vtec cycling events?

Posted
6 hours ago, pokismoki said:

has anyone tried locking out the VVT solenoid on the cam and disabling the Vtec  in the software?  then do a long term intake-valve test with NO catch can.  could the oil deposits be coming from inside the combustion chamber pushing oil mist back up into the intake, during V4 DoD and the cams Vtec cycling events?

It's how passive EGR works sir. 😉 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/11/2021 at 4:28 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

It's how passive EGR works sir. 😉 

I wonder where in the ECM's file I could find and Disable the passive EGR  function? I'll have to call a tuner shop if no one on here knows...

Posted
36 minutes ago, pokismoki said:

I wonder where in the ECM's file I could find and Disable the passive EGR  function? I'll have to call a tuner shop if no one on here knows...

Might want to ask what EGR does in a gasoline motor. Not the same thing it does in a diesel. It isn't there for Nox reduction. It's there to keep the cats alive. Heat management. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/14/2021 at 8:59 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

Might want to ask what EGR does in a gasoline motor. Not the same thing it does in a diesel. It isn't there for Nox reduction. It's there to keep the cats alive. Heat management. 

i thought the cats where cooled during over temp, by the ecu dumping fuel into the motor?

Posted
1 hour ago, pokismoki said:

i thought the cats where cooled during over temp, by the ecu dumping fuel into the motor?

Fuel to cool. I haven't heard that one in a few decades. Honestly I don't know how it responds to an "over' temp.

 

EGR 'moderates' the heat during normal operation. Remember the fire triangle? Heat, fuel, oxygen. (chemical reaction)  

  • Like 1
Posted

i never datalogged it to see if its true, just stuff heard on HPT forum, not sure those guys know what they're talking 'bout either sometimes

2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Fuel to cool. I haven't heard that one in a few decades. Honestly I don't know how it responds to an "over' temp.

 

EGR 'moderates' the heat during normal operation. Remember the fire triangle? Heat, fuel, oxygen. (chemical reaction)  

 

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, pokismoki said:

i never datalogged it to see if its true, just stuff heard on HPT forum, not sure those guys know what they're talking 'bout either sometimes

 

It would be interesting to know wouldn't it? There have been allot of different strategies employed over the decades. Has to be the right mix and at the right cat temperature. The difference in complexity between pretty darn good and zero is nuts. 

 

I won't leave these up for very long as they fill up my attachments limits. 

 

Exhaust & Emissions

 

image.jpeg.20a5e3f7347ffa31d07619224e349223.jpeg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No doubt... But, as someone who doesn't pay for his services, but who has provided a few views/clicks on his Youtube platform, the data around the Mobil oil testing I think does have some value including to "freeloaders" like me.   A lot of what he's doing is likely showing the OE's work in their oil selection, something that many of us had kind of assumed was true all along, a good balance of both excellent protection and efficiency.
    • Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...