Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, SierraHD17 said:

Meh... I have plenty of actual personal experience with the units which I know from others that have left this forum is meaningless to talk about....but still.  They peg easily and rely heavily on using inferior fluid to allow the friction required to operate. It's like the Gov Lock... love it or hate it.

I understand and respect opinions. However, I don't agree that the Torsens need inferior fluid. I put good Mobil1 stuff in mine and it worked fine. Never an issue. They are a very clever design when you think about it. Also, they are spec'd on the Humvees, as well as many other vehicles, so I'm not really sure that mickey mouse would be a good qualifying term to use for them. For hardcore high HP mudbogging, they may not be the best choice, but for all other road requirements; snow, ice, dirt, mud, wet etc., they are a very good choice option.

 

 

57 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Haven't heard back yet from my source but I've watched the video a number of times and don't find it Micky Mouse at all. 

Those pinions are nested in close fitting bores just like your crankshaft is spinning in the mains and just like your crankshaft it is being forced in directions every which way and yet I don't see that as MM either. These are hardened gears in hardened bores spinning at or near zero rpm. They don't rely on case friction but gear friction. Clutches in  you LSD rely on friction. Clutches in the AT or for your MT or your brakes all rely on friction. Two gears on opposite shafts in a MT are trying to force themselves away from each other. The sun and planetary gears in your AT ditto. None of that is either MM nor is it even avoidable. Eaton designed for this just like anyone else does when friction is the operative means for functionality.  This is about as seamless a system as has been devised. Millions of these units have outlived the powertrains they control. I'm in.  

We don't agree on a lot, but here I will give you a high 5!

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

While it is possible that GM will go to a different system, and still use G80 as the order code, here is a video of the Eaton system. 

Also possible they could use different systems in different vehicles....

 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 12/4/2019 at 9:10 AM, BigBadSierra said:

I'll take a mechanical locker over and electric solenoid or air system or valve pushing  something in place any day.

 

It's simple and it works that's why they have stuck with it.

 

Because the G80 works automatically, NO electronics, No input from the driver is needed , 

 

From personal experience; and I live in Snow Country in the mountains.  I could pull up to a stop sign, snow or some partial ice on the road, and try to pull out, from that stop sigh on a slight uphill grade; and the G80 mechanical locker would allow me to pull out into traffic safely.

 

With electronic controlled or driver controlled, I would have had to hit a button or switch to engage the locking rear end.  I imagine I did get it to pull out into traffic about 4 feet and one of the wheels hit an ice patch.  Traffic coming and I am  stuck half out in traffic. Talk about shixxing your pants!.

 

If I had the G80 mechanical locker; there would be no problem. If one tire hit an ice patch, pulling out from that stop sign, the G80 would automatically  kick in and I would be moving. 

 

I am NOT talking about rock climbing, where I would have time to shift the axle in;  I am talking real world driving. 

Posted

And now GM does offer E-lockers, both front and rear.

 

Yes, for now at least, only on 1500 ZR2 and AT4X.  

 

G80 rear remains standard on most trims (and available on the lower trims where it is not standard)

G80   Auto-locking rear differential

 

 

 

On AT4X and ZR2 e-locking is standard front and rear (and G80 is not available)

G93 Differential, driver-selectable full-locking front, e-locking

 

G94 Differential, driver-selectable full-locking rear, e-locking

 

 

I'd be more interested in the Multimatic DSSV shocks...also only available on ZR2 and AT4X

ZRX Suspension, Off-Road with 2" factory installed lift and Multimatic DSSV dampers
1 - Not available with 22" LPO wheels and tires.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,915
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ChristopherDobson
    Newest Member
    ChristopherDobson
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,252 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monthly payment is only part of the equation. With today's prices and interest rates, I'd look at the total monthly cost: payment, insurance, registration, fuel, maintenance, and expected repairs. A vehicle that fits comfortably into your budget is usually the better choice than stretching for a higher trim. I've also kept my vehicles longer over the past few years. New cars have gotten expensive enough that driving one for 10+ years, while staying on top of maintenance, often ends up being the most cost-effective approach.
    • 10 Ford and Chevy engines proven to reach 300,000 miles   You may note a common 3K OCI on this list of gas motors. I skipped over the diesels. Dh'O. 
    • Thanks newdude!  By the time manual selection is needed, I'm probably too much of a control-freak to depend on the transmission sensing braking to activate automatic downshifting.  I would be anticipating the situation and already be manually downshifting.   This truck replaced a 2004.5 LLY diesel with the Allison 5-speed.  Putting it in T/H made noticeable differences (when the torque converter locked, upshift points, downshift behavior).  On this 2024 gasser with the 10L1000 I haven't been able to detect much, if any, difference.  Ok, I can never tell now when the torque converter locks up.  But I also don't notice differences in shifting.  For downhills, I've probably already manually downshifted by then anyway.  Since it's also more awkward (than the 2004.5) to engage/disengage I don't even bother.  Or maybe it doesn't really matter with just a 3k lb. camper in the bed?   Thanks also for the list of reasons the charging system might select various voltages.  However, what I am seeing doesn't fall into any of those categories.  It very definitely, and very consistently, rises after coasting/braking.  Maybe not immediately, but not very long after coasting/braking.  Very consistently drops voltage when no longer coasting/braking.  It might also be interacting with the camper battery charging (I might disconnect the camper and see if it changes the charging behavior).  I also need to recheck turning on headlights for when I want to force it to charge the camper.   Another JR, in June I converted the camper to LiFePO4.  Since it's not a good idea to try to charge lithiums directly using truck, I installed a Victron Orion XS DC-DC charger (which BTW is AMAZING!!).  Being cheap, I only had to buy that one item (besides the battery, of course) to do the conversion.  The camper OEM 120v battery charger (only 19 years old and works perfectly) and the truck feed the input to the DC-DC charger (not at the same time).  But I didn't want the camper charger feeding back to the truck so I kept the old separator.  I considered replacing the separator with a 30amp diode but that means more work and might add another 1/2 volt drop.  One thing that surprised me was the voltage drop over the long 10awg wire run, so I can only charge smoothly at 8 amps (because the DC-DC charger is completely configurable).  Another reason I don't want an added voltage drop with the diode.  I might also be a little lazy but all this work is being done under the sink with a small cabinet opening.    
    • apparently CA smog is (or at least was)  checking that the vehicle is using the oem and/or a ca smog approved tune, so I expect you'll fail inspection doing it.
    • yes, leaking exhaust will mess up o2 sensor readings, which in turn messes up fuel trims.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...