Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2015 Silverado 5.3L LT 4WD 63,000 miles.

 

Recently started developing a shutter / misfire under load. Happens the most around 1250-1500 RPM. Doesn't seem to have lost any power and no codes being thrown.

 

Here's a list of things I've done:

 

-No misfires actively being logged over 20 minute drive.

-Replaced Spark Plugs

-Replaced Spark Plug Wires

-Replaced MAF Sensor

-Inspected transmission pan - no shavings - transmission shop doesn't think its transmission - shutter happens in 2nd-6th gear when converter is forced locked.

-Tripled torque converter lock up pressure and removed TCC slip

-Highly concentrated amount of seafoam through gas tank (entire bottle for less than 5 gallons of fuel)

-Individually turned off each fuel injector @ 2000 RPM to see if any are failing. Nothing seemed off.

-Not burning any oil.

-Catch can since almost new.

 

 

Only thing I've noticed is running 87 Octane instead of 93 Octane makes it worse. I'm completely out of ideas here and hoping maybe someone else has run into something similar.

 

 

Posted

When you say it happens with the torque converter locked, that says to me it's a possible torque converter issue itself.

 

A nicer scan tool that could do transmission controls could be used as you drove the truck. When the shutter happens with the TC locked, just unlock it and see if it stops.

Posted
21 hours ago, CamGTP said:

When you say it happens with the torque converter locked, that says to me it's a possible torque converter issue itself. 

 

A nicer scan tool that could do transmission controls could be used as you drove the truck. When the shutter happens with the TC locked, just unlock it and see if it stops. 

 

When I unlock it, it does stop but its also moving it outside that RPM range. I originally thought it was a torque converter issue but my trans shop said it feels/sounds like the engine. I'm using HP Tuners for the controls.

  • Like 1
Posted

Well, sounds like you’ve checked/considered everything...except fuel. Check the fuel trims with a scan tool, if it’s something like -25%...fuel is being taken away (because too much fuel is being use). Leaking injectors could be the cause.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Doublebase said:

Well, sounds like you’ve checked/considered everything...except fuel. Check the fuel trims with a scan tool, if it’s something like -25%...fuel is being taken away (because too much fuel is being use). Leaking injectors could be the cause. 

I did "look" at it when I had the scanner going but didn't check close or for long since I was looking at other stuff. I'll report back what I find. Thanks for the advice.

  • Like 1
Posted

Well it looks like STFT and LTFT are actually almost perfect so I think I can rule out Fuel. Looks like MAP needs to be 90kPa or higher to reproduce the shutter/misfire. I'm starting to lean more and more towards torque converter.

 

 

image.thumb.png.92f717647432c4dfe380c55888e5cbb1.png

image.thumb.png.d3315fa00ceb670ccdd48aae745c4ca3.png

 

Posted

Well small update, looks like something might be going on with fuel after all. My LTFT values are peaking towards negative 17-18% over time but only at idle.

 

 

The little orange "squares" spiking upward are me hitting the gas. All trims start out a 0% when engine starts. LTFT takes about 15-25 minutes to hit -17%.

 

image.thumb.png.5698bcdee2c37f23cc19721447f55127.png

 

 

I noticed with my tune I'm adding fuel around the RPMs I'm feeling the issue and it gets a lot better. Not sure what to think about this yet.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Doing a little bit of research it looks like its potentially PCV Valve or a vacuum issue somewhere. I ordered a valve and going to replace tomorrow. For $8 its worth it to swap out just to see.

Posted
15 hours ago, ic3man5 said:

Doing a little bit of research it looks like its potentially PCV Valve or a vacuum issue somewhere. I ordered a valve and going to replace tomorrow. For $8 its worth it to swap out just to see.

But does that make sense to you? A vacuum issue would introduce air into the intake, the computer would compensate and add MORE fuel, not take away fuel, right? So you'd have + fuel trim, not negative. Vacuum leaks skew the fuel trim positive.

 

And there is no PCV valve on these trucks, it's a fixed orifice, it won't get any larger and cause excess flow. You can replace it, but it's not a PCV valve. And if you did have a vacuum leak in that part of the system, I think it would cause a misfire at cylinder 5  (because the PCV line dumps right above cylinder five at the intake). If you have a catch can, potentially you may have a leak at one of the lines causing a vacuum situation, but I still think your fuel trim would trend +, not -.

 

I could be totally wrong, let me know what you find out/how it goes.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I never found out what the issue was so I modified the VE tables in HP Tuners to reduce the fuel a bit and made it upshift easier under load for right now. I figured once it gets worse it will actually trip a code or make it so I can diagnose it.

 

I did figure out messing with the VE tables that I was already in a rich condition because I bumped the idle up to 700 which put it in the next "section", so if you are going to increase the idle keep it under 700, I think they run 700-1200 RPM rich for cold starts in the winter.

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Ozer said:

you are out of warranty based on build date? 5yr/100k

That is only powertrain which I think doesn't apply to the engine unless its like a total failure. 3 yr/36,000 mi basic, 5 yr/100,000 mi powertrain. No extended warranty, I won't buy a product I feel needs one ever. I beat on it within the first warranty to make sure whatever is going to break, breaks fast and not slow outside the warranty. I've heard too many stories of "This broke about 100 miles outside my warranty and I drove it nice the whole time."

Edited by ic3man5
Posted
On 2/8/2020 at 12:17 PM, carnau said:

Whats your fuel injector balance?

Everything I could test with the fuel injectors showed they were okay from the computer side, I can't test more without actually taking it to a shop and seeing if they are balanced properly. I did individually turn off each injector idling the truck @ ~2500 RPM and there was no difference in any of them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,921
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Enduro73
    Newest Member
    Enduro73
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,387 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.
    • Yes.  The 2.7 Turbomax has Active Fuel Management.  It is NOT the same as the V8s.  Totally different system.     Here is an article from GM when the 2.7 came out explaining the cylinder deactivation and the valve lift system.  Starts at the section called "SCS Valvetrain":   New Turbocharged 2.7L 4-Cylinder Engine Powers Full-Size Trucks – TechLink         This is an internet myth going around.  It was alleged that some 5.3s had this mystical 8th digit of the VIN as an "E" which somehow meant it had a new one year only 5.3 that didn't have DFM.  The writer of said article and the person that made the claim conveniently can't count because they posted the VIN.  The 8th digit was a "D" which meant its still the 5.3 with DFM.  The 9th digit of the VIN was an "E" and the 9th digit isn't the engine code.  At all.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...