Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just remember, for any given collision, there is X amount of energy to dissipate.  If your bumper is super-strong and doesn't crumple at all, that energy goes into the frame, for the frame to dissipate...

  • Like 1
Posted

After hitting a deer in the middle of nowhere. Costing $17,000.00. let the frame bend. I can't imagine in a hard hit the stock bumper absorbs much. this deer hit was at 70mph weighing 24,000 pounds.

 

 

 

IMG_0679.JPG

Posted (edited)

Well, it also means that in an accident, more force is transmitted to the people in the truck.  Before the frame bends, that energy is transmitted along the frame, and the cab, and the seats in the cab, which are all bolted together quite firmly.  So, instead of the front end crumpling up like it's supposed to, it stays rock solid, and instead the vehicle slows down a little faster, and the people inside have more G's applied to their bodies, injuring them a bit more.

 

And instead of replacing the bumper, grill and trim bits up front, the vehicle needs the frame straightened, or replaced, or the vehicle is totalled...

Edited by davester
  • Like 3
Posted

I love the look.  I had an Iron Bull bumper and grill guard on my 07 1500 and have been thinking about one for my 2020 3500.

I took out a big eight point in Iowa with that bumper and didn't even scratch anything.  Paid for the bumper right then and there.

 

Did you install it yourself and how did it work with the sensors for park assist and air bags.

Posted
On 4/18/2020 at 1:47 PM, skorpyd said:

I love the look.  I had an Iron Bull bumper and grill guard on my 07 1500 and have been thinking about one for my 2020 3500.

I took out a big eight point in Iowa with that bumper and didn't even scratch anything.  Paid for the bumper right then and there.

 

Did you install it yourself and how did it work with the sensors for park assist and air bags.

I installed it. sensors were a pain to get out of the old bumper. Went in to new bumper easy and fit was great.Work fine. Also has the engine heater plug. Air bag sensors are not on bumper. The front camera has a slight view of the lower bar. but it's still usable I have to get close to the wall in my garage to close door. I live in Montana I've hit 2 deer in the past 2 years. ( first deer I've ever hit in 30 years) Less people hunting. The deer here are getting out of control. I'm not taking chances. The second deer was in a 1500, just clipped it but it spun into door and blew side air bags. $12,000. That one had a ranch hand grill guard it snapped like a twig, but it only needed a headlight and fender, all the money was in air bags , seat belts and modules.

Posted
19 hours ago, 33street said:

I installed it. sensors were a pain to get out of the old bumper. Went in to new bumper easy and fit was great.Work fine. Also has the engine heater plug. Air bag sensors are not on bumper. The front camera has a slight view of the lower bar. but it's still usable I have to get close to the wall in my garage to close door. I live in Montana I've hit 2 deer in the past 2 years. ( first deer I've ever hit in 30 years) Less people hunting. The deer here are getting out of control. I'm not taking chances. The second deer was in a 1500, just clipped it but it spun into door and blew side air bags. $12,000. That one had a ranch hand grill guard it snapped like a twig, but it only needed a headlight and fender, all the money was in air bags , seat belts and modules.

So the bumper itself was reasonably easy to install and fit is good?  I don't have front camera or heater plug so that's not a worry.

Posted

Thanks for the info,  I would love to get one.  I'm kind of holding off to see how this pandemic shakes out before putting out the money.    I see the bumpers are also made in Montana, are you affiliated.

Posted
On 4/23/2020 at 2:39 PM, skorpyd said:

Thanks for the info,  I would love to get one.  I'm kind of holding off to see how this pandemic shakes out before putting out the money.    I see the bumpers are also made in Montana, are you affiliated.

No affiliation! they build them 130 miles away and are powder coated local. so no shipping.

Posted
On 4/21/2020 at 9:55 PM, migrabill said:

Not trying to be a hater... but in a word.... yuck.

 

That's OK ! I wouldn't expect someone from Maryland to understand. (it's a man thing) It's a bit rugged where I live. Shiny doesn't get you home.

Posted (edited)

 I dig my bumper, it's giant, so I don't expect many of you to like it. It's made specificly to fend off deer strikes at speed. Coast a bundle, weighs 225 pounds without the winch. I've had it on 2 different trucks, it fits perfect. Buckstop, made in Oregon, workmanship is top notch, perfect welds, great powder coating.

IMG_0233.JPG

Edited by gearheadesw
  • 2 months later...
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, CT Chevy Connoisseur said:

Went with TrailReady - love it

FullSizeR (00D).jpg

InkedFullSizeR (00E)_LI.jpg

Looks real good. Just posted in another thread tht I intend on building my own similar to this. I plan on leaving a little.more room for standing on top of it to help reach into the engine compartment. I'm 6-1 and still feel like a dwarf around this thing. I also plan on a recessed receiver in the bottom, center. Not sure if I want a winch yet. Might just make a storage box and could add one later. Already got the upfitter switches for the lights and accessories. Also, any pictures of the mounting technique?

Edited by Stand By

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...