Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So, a few months back I cut an extra airbox that I had. With the stock air filter, everything was fine. With a K&N, I got a message about my air filter quite often. i would reset and it would come back. So, I put the stock box back on and went on my way.

 

Recently, I was looking at intakes for the truck and I found several people that got that message with their intakes and they just cleared it from the dash. HA HA, why didn't I think of that?

 

Today, i reinstalled the cut lower airbox and filmed it for your viewing pleasure.

 

Just a free mod anyone can do. i chose that area to cut because it is opposite the engine and it is covered by the fenderwell to keep out additional debris. All previous trucks, I cut the airbox as well but this one wasn't like the others because of the snorkel that bottlenecks at the radiator area. 

 

 Extra power? I don't know

 

More noise - it has a little bit more growl to it. I like it, very subtle.

 

Do I like it ? Absolutely !

 

Put this in with your exhaust valve mod and you have 2 really cool free mods !

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted

So it's just sucking in hot, dirty, underhood air?

 

Pass.

 

Factory air intake and all the good aftermarket ones are sealed in and sucking in cooler external air for a reason.

Posted
5 minutes ago, AJMBLAZER said:

So it's just sucking in hot, dirty, underhood air?

 

Pass.

 

Factory air intake and all the good aftermarket ones are sealed in and sucking in cooler external air for a reason.

I respect your opinion on this, it's definitely not for everyone and I only did it because I had the extra box.

 

To reply to your assumptions, with my scantool hooked up I have not seen this "hot air" you speak of. The air it is getting is from behind the head light, just above the fenderwell.

 

If you look at the S&B intake, it has openings about 8" above where I made my cut out and is sucking air from the same spot. Is it "Dirty", that's unknown at this point but in time I will see on the air filter.

 

If driving down a dirt road, yeah, it's likely grabbing dusty dirty air, that is however, no different than being behind someone on a dirty road with a fully enclosed factory box.

  • Like 1
  • 5 months later...
Posted
On 6/15/2020 at 2:51 PM, Carbon said:

I respect your opinion on this, it's definitely not for everyone and I only did it because I had the extra box.

 

To reply to your assumptions, with my scantool hooked up I have not seen this "hot air" you speak of. The air it is getting is from behind the head light, just above the fenderwell.

 

If you look at the S&B intake, it has openings about 8" above where I made my cut out and is sucking air from the same spot. Is it "Dirty", that's unknown at this point but in time I will see on the air filter.

 

If driving down a dirt road, yeah, it's likely grabbing dusty dirty air, that is however, no different than being behind someone on a dirty road with a fully enclosed factory box.

Did this on my 2015, however I did the cheese grater mod and a 2” hole with a foam prefilter. Drilled out the baffle. Then Air raid MIT with a afe pro dry S. Never had debris or crazy amount of dust. I drove in the desert a lot too. Once my headers and catback were on and I tuned it that 5.3 was a monster. Big fan of the mod, but after it was said and done, cost of the tube and filter and work would’ve been about the same as doing a CAI.

Posted

I’m younger days I always added aftermarket cold air boxes along with exhaust. Didn’t really care if it add performance, I wanted the sound. Did hand held tunes too. I noticed my air boxes were similar between models. So I did the drill mod on my 04 to open the air box. Then I bought rubber plugs to plug it if I didn’t want the noise usually on trips. Bought super trapp mufflers for the same reason. Put a drop in K&N or Amsoil filter and was good to go. Didn’t see or feel any difference between the 02 with the after market and my 04 cheap mods.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 652 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...