Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey all,

 

I have a 2019 Denali that I have been trying to chase down a rumble in the cab when I’m decelerating from about 30-20 mph. I think it is pinion angle related or tq converter. My truck has shims under the rear leaf pack to adjust the angle from the factory.

 

There are a couple of threads about the rumble but nobody has seemed to be able to solve it. One guy did with flipping the shims but his truck was lifted so trying to figure out the protocol on a stock truck.

 

I have had a few loaner trucks and they had the very slightest rumble not anywhere near as bad as mine and the 2020’s don’t have the shims.

 

My question is, do you think GM arbitrarily added shims to 2019 trucks or did they truly measure driveline angles and put the shims on the trucks that needed it.

 

That being said, why would the 2020’s not have shims? What might have changed that they didnt need them?

 

I’m just trying to do some research before I pull the shims on my truck out which seems to be a bit involved.

 

Thanks in advance for any insight!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
Try loosining the tie bolt and spinning the shim 180°.

I know spinning it has worked for you guys with lowering/level kits in the rear but my truck is completely stock.

That being said, it might be worth trying to see if it makes it better or worse instead of taking it completely out. Only problem is that swings the pinion angle like 4 degrees instead of just two by removing it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I've ridden a '20 that had a slight vibration on decel. Try spinning shim; it's worth a try.  If it doesn't work you may have something else causing it.

  • Like 1
Posted
I've ridden a '20 that had a slight vibration on decel. Try spinning shim; it's worth a try.  If it doesn't work you may have something else causing it.

Agreed, I’ll give it a shot. It’s either that or the torque converter, hoping it’s as simple as the pinion angle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have a 19' and lifted it 1.5in in the rear and 1in in the front since my High Country came almost level from factory. After I didn't like the rake so ordered a 1in block instead of the 1.5in and WOW major vibration like you have, decel from 40 or so down. It was so bad I thought I had messed up the truck. Got it back and changed out to the 1.5in and it was gone well almost gone. Now that I know what it feels like I can still feel it when I decel, it's about 95% better but I can still feel it.

 

So it seems like these things are VERY sensitive to driveline angle, I'm going to run up the street to look at an AT4 and see if the shim is in there and which way for mine. As for yours have you brought it back to the dealer?

  • Like 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, CMillSilverado said:

I have a 19' and lifted it 1.5in in the rear and 1in in the front since my High Country came almost level from factory. After I didn't like the rake so ordered a 1in block instead of the 1.5in and WOW major vibration like you have, decel from 40 or so down. It was so bad I thought I had messed up the truck. Got it back and changed out to the 1.5in and it was gone well almost gone. Now that I know what it feels like I can still feel it when I decel, it's about 95% better but I can still feel it.

 

So it seems like these things are VERY sensitive to driveline angle, I'm going to run up the street to look at an AT4 and see if the shim is in there and which way for mine. As for yours have you brought it back to the dealer?

 

Yeah, I think these trucks are super sensitve to driveline angle. I took mine to the dealer back in January and they had it for a week and couldn't figure it out. That being said, they didn't even mess with the shims or driveline angle, they are not very competent to say the least. All they did was tests on the transmission and reported back to GM and GM deemed it "operating as normal". They said they drove a few trucks on their lot and a few did it worse than mine and a few were better. I wouldn't want to feel the trucks that were worse than mine because mine is VERY noticeable. 

 

I think they put shims in all of the 2019's because they didn't know what they were doing. The fact my rear diff is 4 degrees off from the factory is pretty alarming. I had the rear window leak on my truck and had two 2020 loaners, same config as my truck, 8 speed trans and neither one of them had the shims and they didn't have the rumble on decel. I think that's the culprit on mine, just need to get some time to remove or spin the shims. By my calculations, removing it is better than spinning it to correct my angles. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, CMillSilverado said:

Do you even have a 19+ GM??

So you think physics changed for 2019 and beyond?

Interesting idea.

Wonder if gravity will work tomorrow. 

 

 

Posted
Just now, Grumpy Bear said:

So you think physics changed for 2019 and beyond?

Interesting idea.

Wonder if gravity will work tomorrow. 

 

 

15' and 19' trucks are not the same, stay with what you know.

Posted
18 minutes ago, CMillSilverado said:

15' and 19' trucks are not the same, stay with what you know.

Same information will apply. 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, CMillSilverado said:

15' and 19' trucks are not the same, stay with what you know.

News Flash

The drive shaft physics is.

 

:wtf:

 

 

Psssst. We are not doing this, read me?

3 minutes ago, BlancoSilverado said:

Same information will apply. 

 

 

 

:thumbs:

  • Like 1
Posted

There is something differnet, I had the same lift on my 17' and set up the driveline angle and had zero vibration, did the same to the 19' and there is vibration.

Posted
On 8/6/2020 at 9:44 AM, CMillSilverado said:

There is something differnet, I had the same lift on my 17' and set up the driveline angle and had zero vibration, did the same to the 19' and there is vibration.

Did you check your angles?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,931 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...