Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 2/23/2021 at 2:28 PM, Nasir222 said:

Do you have pics posted of your subs+enclosure? I have been told by too many people on forums that even though I have my rear seats raised in my 17" Crew Cab, that I won't have enough air space for dual 12s. I have been searching everywhere for a blueprint or plans for these trucks underseat subwoofer enclosures. I figure I can start there for designing a enclosure. 

You may be stretching it on air space in your 17 because the rear seat does not have the same amount of available air space as the 19+. I created a sealed box for my 14-18 GMC Sierra in the past, but my 19 had the room to create a ported enclosure. I had countless hours in designing the box to utilize every area and tune the port correctly. Once I completed the design, I only had a tiny section of the box blocked off that was not needed, so my recommendation in your 17 would be going sealed. If you ever upgrade trucks to a 2019+, you could get away with a ported enclosure with a fair amount of design time.

 

Here are a few pictures of the box installed. I'll be posting my complete audio build here soon. The build document will have more photos of the enclosure coming to life. I have been busy, and I have a lot of information I want to share, so it takes me some time to get the document put together.

20201101_160813.jpg

20201101_160802.jpg

Posted
On 10/8/2020 at 2:41 PM, KV14 said:

You will not see the DC voltage of an aftermarket alternator increase much differently than a factory alternator. What you are looking for is how much DC amperage you are using and do you need more. You can find some ways listed on the internet to help you determine this information. 

 

Your current 2000 watt draw may seem fine, but you could still be causing an amperage bottleneck at the alternator without noticing. It's possible you not getting the full potential out of your amplifier.

 

I used some paper calculations to determine how much extra amperage I needed over the factory alternator. If you are pushing 2000 watts with a nominal DC voltage of 13.5v, you have added about 148 amps (2000 / 13.5) of demand to the electrical system. If you tested the rest of your vehicle's amperage draw you can determine how many amps you need. I just used my factor alternator's max amperage and knew it had a little extra headroom. My truck came stock with 170 amp alternator and my audio system could potentially pull an additional 162 amps. That put me at needing potentially 332 amps with everything maxed out. Vehicles alternators have some headroom and the amplifier may not be maxed out, so purchasing a 250 amp alternator may provide all the amperage needed or it will at least still improve the total amperage output over the stock alternator. We can't get any bigger than a 250 amp alternator, so determining a need more then 250 amps will not be an advantage.

 

Hope that helps you make your determination.
 

I just purchased a 320 amp you don’t think it will work going the same route how you hooked up your 250?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...