Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just like the title says will it drone.  I have a magnaflow 12909 now on my cammed L86 with full bolt-ons with headers no cats.  And want a tad more bark,  this muffler really tones down the cam at idle.  And WOT it seem a-little to raspy.  Almost tin can sounding.  The wife drives a Scat pack 6.4 with muffler delete and dynomax bullets in thier place.  Anything I could do to get my truck to sound closer to her car would be great.  Because that thing is music to my hears LOL.  I had a 12909 on my last 2008 6.2 and liked it but this Direct engine sounds a-little different.

 

I pull a wakeboard boat all summer, so I need to keep the drone to a minimal for my families sake.

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Snowcamo said:

Atak with a resonator installed before to knock out the rasp. Sounds like a beast

Is that a 3.5 in and 3.5 out

Posted

I watched some videos of the Atak and it sounds nice.  But I'm looking to just swap mufflers since I already have 3.5" pipes.

Posted
6 hours ago, JONBLARC7 said:

I watched some videos of the Atak and it sounds nice.  But I'm looking to just swap mufflers since I already have 3.5" pipes.

Your going to want a multicore xr1 then. The catbacks a single in - dual out.

Posted
43 minutes ago, JONBLARC7 said:

Can you explain why??

The mutlticore is the same tech that's inside the borla attack. Something to do with tubing in the muffler that produces different exhaust notes. That being said I've read that the attack drones, and will be insanely loud with headers. So figuring out which xr1 muffler to go with would take trial and error. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

The mutlticore is the same tech that's inside the borla attack. Something to do with tubing in the muffler that produces different exhaust notes. That being said I've read that the attack drones, and will be insanely loud with headers. So figuring out which xr1 muffler to go with would take trial and error. 

Well I'm going too stick with a XR1.  The 12909 is no louder than a stock muffler.  It's just a-little deeper.  When you add headers and no cats it gets much louder.

 

I can get the XR1 in the round 15"x5" round case.  And from reading comments on YouTube the round XR1 is suppose to be less raspy.  The 12909 is a 22" body and if I go down to a 15" body on a XR1 I should pick up the little bit of sound I want.

Posted
4 hours ago, JONBLARC7 said:

Well I'm going too stick with a XR1.  The 12909 is no louder than a stock muffler.  It's just a-little deeper.  When you add headers and no cats it gets much louder.

 

I can get the XR1 in the round 15"x5" round case.  And from reading comments on YouTube the round XR1 is suppose to be less raspy.  The 12909 is a 22" body and if I go down to a 15" body on a XR1 I should pick up the little bit of sound I want.

Shoot me a fair price on your 12909 and I might take it off your hands :)

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 10/23/2020 at 7:42 AM, JONBLARC7 said:

Well I'm going too stick with a XR1.  The 12909 is no louder than a stock muffler.  It's just a-little deeper.  When you add headers and no cats it gets much louder.

 

I can get the XR1 in the round 15"x5" round case.  And from reading comments on YouTube the round XR1 is suppose to be less raspy.  The 12909 is a 22" body and if I go down to a 15" body on a XR1 I should pick up the little bit of sound I want.

I believe the 15x5 xr1 is the one I have, its pretty dang loud. Still quiets nicely at idle. But wot its pretty dang loud. Just a muffler swap and resonator deleted. Dumped after the axle. Full 3.5" pipe. Mine has drone, I can only imagine with headers. I would say maybe the muffler with a high flow resonator might do it for you.

Posted

Thanks I got the 15x5 XR1 sitting in my closet.  I’ll give it a try with it dumped over the rear axle.  I found a guy on YouTube that does a bunch of muffler videos for our trucks with headers and no cats.  He says it doesn’t drone with headers but who knows what to believe on the internet these days.


 Thanks for you input.  If it’s to loud I’ll clamp the stock rear resonator temporally until I can get a resonator and a good tip put on.  
 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Yea my xr1 is way louder than the standard Flowmaster and magnaflow offerings. I have heard all 3 with 6.2s and mine is easily the loudest. Personal I think it sounds the best too.

 

Which headers do you have? And you have the O2s turned off in the tune?

Thinking that will be one of my next mods

Posted
1 hour ago, JONBLARC7 said:

Speed engineer with the cattless Y pipe.  And yes my rear O2's are turned off in the tune.

Oh good. How are you liking them? They fit good? Are you 4x4? I'm thinking about those soon on mine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,978
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 506 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...