Jump to content

VIDEO- Engine/ tranny? Whine and knock ?‍♂️

Dersch
 Share

Recommended Posts

Dersch Enthusiast

Dersch

Posted
Posted

Figured id lost this up here. Going to take in tomorrow night when I get home from this trip.

 

2020 Silverado Trailboss LT 5.3L 4x4 10k miles

 

So a few days ago i noticed a small hardly noticable whine. Didnt think much of it. So now im up in the mountains on vacation and the whine has gotten increasingly worse and now i have a knock (will post video). 

 

The whine is heard from inside vehicle (only with windows down tho). The whine gets louder when you push the gas too. 

The knock was only heard when i crawled under the truck to see where the whine was coming from. It appears as youll see from the video to come from where the oil plug/ filter is located. I cant isolate it. 

I do not see any leaks anywhere. The plug appears to be dry/ no old oil around it. The filter itself is black but i dont see any oil drippings over the stickers on it. Imma check the oil here in a bit once it cools off.

 

Anyone experienced this? Im really hoping i dont end up with a bad motor/ tranny. Ive heard when you do they just warranty the truck back? 

 

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, EricTheRed said:

Video is not working 

Works for me....

 

Doesn't sound right to me, 

but I find that video/audio of this type is often misleading.

Is it an engine knock, or is it just because of the microphone location used? 

 

I'm interested in hearing the diagnosis.

Edited by redwngr
Dersch Enthusiast

Dersch

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, redwngr said:

Works for me....

 

Doesn't sound right to me, 

but I find that video/audio of this type is often misleading.

Is it an engine knock, or is it just because of the microphone location used?

Definitely a knock. O hear it with my ears

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Dersch said:

Definitely a knock. O hear it with my ears

Sorry. Wasn't intending to suggest it's not, just that it's hard to help diagnose from a video/audio taken from a location that many/most probably aren't used to listening from.  (as opposed many being used to listening from beside vehicle, or while looking at engine from above with hood open, or....)

 

Were you able to take it in Monday as expected?

 

 

Dersch Enthusiast

Dersch

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, redwngr said:

Sorry. Wasn't intending to suggest it's not, just that it's hard to help diagnose from a video/audio taken from a location that many/most probably aren't used to listening from.  (as opposed many being used to listening from beside vehicle, or while looking at engine from above with hood open, or....)

 

Were you able to take it in Monday as expected?

 

 

No worries I know what you mean. Videos are hard to tell for sure. But having been under the truck a few times definitely a new noise. Its heard standing beside it too but hard to capture.

 

Also I have this posted over here too. Just not sure how to merge them or delete this one? 

 

Im doing updates on this post https://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/244868-video-engine-tranny-whine-and-knock-?‍♂️/?tab=comments#comment-2473585

  • 1 year later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Moconnor Enthusiast

Moconnor

Posted
Posted

Update on my question. My 2020 5.3 was making the same whine as in the video. Sounded like possobly underneath the truck. Just left the dealer where they replaced the ideler pully and the problem is resolved. Said they have replaced a bunch of the pullys. Just FYI if your is doing the same thing. I did not sound lik the front of the engine, it sounded internal. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...