Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Riiiiight, driveshaft can handle the torque of towing a 11 K pound trailer, properly equipped, that force would shred your paper thin driveshaft long before the rpm centrifugal forces made it deform and fail. Dyno run at full throttle producing all the power the engine will make, and we think it came apart from the revs????

Posted
9 hours ago, gearheadesw said:

we think it came apart from the revs????

Yep.  Just as CamGTP said above, there are multiple instances of them exploding.  Frankly, after seeing that, I'm perfectly fine putting my confidence in exceeding the tires speed limit vs. the driveshaft's.

Posted

Any other limiting factor is NOT a moot point.  Engineering limits exist.  These trucks are not built for high speed.  The drive shaft, axle, and transfer case for those with 4WD are NOT engineered for high speeds.  If you want to be a ****** and argue against that, it's your own stupidity you are arguing against. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Colossus said:

Any other limiting factor is NOT a moot point.  Engineering limits exist.  These trucks are not built for high speed.  The drive shaft, axle, and transfer case for those with 4WD are NOT engineered for high speeds.  If you want to be a ****** and argue against that, it's your own stupidity you are arguing against. 

 

 

Thanks!  That's what I was trying to say - you just said it much better!  ??

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Colossus said:

Any other limiting factor is NOT a moot point.  Engineering limits exist.  These trucks are not built for high speed.  The drive shaft, axle, and transfer case for those with 4WD are NOT engineered for high speeds.  If you want to be a ****** and argue against that, it's your own stupidity you are arguing against. 

 

 

Your right, the drivetrain is engineered to spin based on the vehicles spec. anything over that the shaft WILL be out of balance. Driveshaft weights are for balance at lets say 2000 rpm now you want the shaft to turn at 4000 rpm the shaft will be out of balance. A .40 oz weight at 2000 rpm will apply about 3.0 lbs of force on the shaft keeping it smooth on rotation now spin that same shaft at around 4000 rpm that same .40 oz weight will apply about 53 lbs of force on the shaft making it un-balanced. With these thin walled shafts it will be a matter of seconds before the shaft self destructs. Keep in mind if your running the truck at those speeds and start feeling a vibration you wont get the truck stopped in time before it comes out. 

 

So this is something I what to put out there and maybe someone will think about this and save someone if you think this is BS then your on your own.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm just having a hard time seeing the driveshaft take the abuse from towing, in particular, then spinning forces causing the metal to fail.Torsional forces create that twisting force to twist the shaft into a twisted straw, I'm just surprised the revs would expand the metal enough to fail, have seen twisted driveshafts, but never an explode one....

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Colossus said:

Any other limiting factor is NOT a moot point.  Engineering limits exist.  These trucks are not built for high speed.  The drive shaft, axle, and transfer case for those with 4WD are NOT engineered for high speeds.  If you want to be a ****** and argue against that, it's your own stupidity you are arguing against. 

 

 

I said it was a moot point, because you hit the speed limit of the tires BEFORE you hit the limit of any other parts. Therefore if you don't exceed the tires speed rating, you don't have to worry about anything else. 

Obviously you didn't read the part about functioning up/beyond their design specification.

When you go changing the stock speed limiter, you're asking those parts to perform outside that design spec, and that's on you.

Don't be a Richard Cranium.

Edited by polarys425

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 287,500 Mile Service   8/13/2026   Reset Fuel Trims   Since the work done in the previous post there was a good improvement in response in all areas except right after a fill up where the LTFT would go -20%+ for about four miles while the STFT was near neutral. Before the work they both went very negative for a few miles after a fill up but act normal thereafter.    We did a systems check of the vapor recovery system for functionality and ability to hold a vacuum. That checked out fine. But this doesn't mean the charcoal canister is dead in the water. Testing that is next up. For now the reset of the fuel trims.    I intentionally shorted the fill exactly two gallons to eliminate any chance of filling the canister. On start up the trims were behaving normally until I got up and rolling where the LTFT went -10 / -11%% but the short was + 2 to 0%. Within a mile the the STFT offset the LTFT and by 2 miles they were neutral. HUGE improvement but still not hunky-dory.    I'll watch them for a few days. Perhaps another tank where I will fill completely to 'first click' and compare. Meanwhile on the hunt for a new canister and I'll toss another purge value at it for good measure. Pending the outcome of the canister test that is. Progress of any kind is welcome.    Fuel economy improvement with bringing hole #3 back to the living was a noticeable bump to the positive. Even on the few miles I drove after the refill I already see another bump up by the trims reset.     She's purring like a kitten with a warm bowl of milk.    BTW, adding 50 rpm to the idle took the majority of the negative timing out on cold start up and leaned the cold idle. No longer burbles in the cat. What a dumb way to heat a cat.      
    • Yeah, shame I can’t really get that filter easily anymore. Running a PureOne. Your fave!    TAN would be neat to see. Confirmation I ran it too long probably. 🤣
    • My son and I both bought new trucks in 2017. Both of us immediately put Truck Covers USA American Roll Covers on our trucks. My son still has his truck and it never sees the inside of a garage. We live in Alabama, so not much snow. My truck was my daily driver and was in the garage when I wasn't driving it or at work. No issues with either cover even after almost 9 years. About a year ago I sold my truck to my brother and bought a 2025 Silverado 2500. The second thing that I put on that truck was a new Truck Covers USA cover. They are very well made and have a very positive locking system. I looked at a Retrax and my concern was the way that the cover locked to the rail. BTW, the first thing I put on the new truck was step bars. Those new trucks are high!
    • The Allison 10 speed torque converter doesn't "lock up" like the previous transmissions. It has 4 operational modes; open, slip, transition from open to slip; transition from slip to open. I have an Edge CTS3 monitor and I monitor transmission torque converter slip. Step on the gas and you get a little slip. Take your foot off the gas and you get a little negative slip. I have not found a way to display the torque converter mode beyond that. My Edge CTS3 also displays something that our trucks should already display, the current gear. I also monitor throttle body position and engine load. If I see the engine load getting too high, I'll manually drop a gear.
    • Nice result. Your filter is working well  I'd have like to have seen the acid number for this sample. Curious type that I am. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...