Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys, I swapped my 1995 montero with a 5.3/4l60e about 7 months ago. The engine/trans/pcm is out of a 2001 suburban. Completely stock. My montero is on 35s with 4.63 gears. It is very close gearing to a stock suburban.

Now here is my problem. Under 20-30% load both LTFTs go to 17.3. I know this is not normal because I have a couple other rigs that I can test off of (2002 silverado, 2002 yukon xl). They both have over 250k miles and their LTFT stay +-4 under load. I dont think it is fuel pump/filter related because i can mash it to 6k rpm and it doesnt break up at all it has 50psi at idle and jumps up if i give it gas. . It has no codes either. My Montero feels like it has no power in OD at all, it struggles pulling up hills at 65mph 2k rpm. Where my moms yukon will pull up the hill at 1600rpm. My torque converter is locked at 65 for sure. I replaced the o2 sensors with denso ones, cleaned maf, and new delco spark plugs. I am thinking a vacuum leak maybe? I sprayed starting fluid everywhere and didnt find one. 

I get a consistent 12mpg with the best being 12.5mpg full freeway driving at 65-70. I think it should get closer to 16-17mpg. I am sure the issue is related to my LTFTs being high. Its either a sensor is giving a false lean and the pcm is dumping fuel in and giving be crap mileage. Or its actually running lean and struggling to keep itself at speed. According to my scangauge, the montero gets better mpg at 80mph than it does at 65. I think thats just because it is almost bogging at 65 and I have to give it more throttle to keep at that speed. I am going on a 1500 mile road trip in 2 weeks and I would love to get better than 12mpg. Thanks in advance guys.

Posted

Does the computer know what gears and tire size is on the truck?

 

If you are positive fuel pressure is not an issue start looking for vacuum leaks or just go ahead and replace a few gaskets/o-rings. Intake gaskets are cheap and often times the fuel injector o-rings can leak in air when under load. Of course make sure you have no exhaust leak at the manifold and connection point at the collector.

Posted
3 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Does the computer know what gears and tire size is on the truck?

 

If you are positive fuel pressure is not an issue start looking for vacuum leaks or just go ahead and replace a few gaskets/o-rings. Intake gaskets are cheap and often times the fuel injector o-rings can leak in air when under load. Of course make sure you have no exhaust leak at the manifold and connection point at the collector.

Yes the computer was calibrated for the gears and tires. MPH reads dead on. I rebuilt the whole engine so it has new gaskets all around. Just today I swapped my MAF with one off my moms yukon and the fuel trims went down significantly. from 17 down to 8.6. And it seemed that the STFTs were compensating for that 8.6. So maybe more time and it would have went back down. I went ahead and ordered a delphi maf today so hopefully that solves the problem. Its also interesting that you say the injectors can allow air under load. It seems as if my fuel rails are bent or something. the rear injector on the drivers side looks like it isnt seated all the way like the other ones are. But there is no adjustment with them. However, now that I think about it, if the injectors themselves had a vacuum leak then that would make one cylinder lean and probably ping. Both banks read almost exactly the same so I figure its something that affects all the cylinders. The maf should be here in a few days so I'll check back then. Thanks for the suggestions!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • If everything checks out at the MAF, then the MAF is BAD, new or not.   You don't need a signal generator to troubleshoot this. PCM needs ALL powers and ALL grounds able to light a halogen headlight bulb - if it can light the bulb bright, then the wiring is good enough to run the PCM.   Best thing you can do for yourself is spend some time here: scannerdanner.com - Check out all his YouTube videos on similar issues. If you decide to subscribe it's the best bang-for-buck ratio in the automotive world, hands-down. He's got TONS of free vids on YouTube, too.
    • Yes, I used my multimeter to probe all of the wires at the MAF, both with the sensor connected, sensor disconnected, key on engine off, key on engine running, etc etc etc. I probed all of the wires again at the PCM, at the connectors, etc. All voltages are what they should be according to the service manual/wiring diagrams. All grounds are good, less than 20 millivolts from the battery negative under load. Both at the connector of the MAF, at the PCM connector etc.      I know this throws a pretty big wrench into things, but this truck was acting up before the swap. I don't have very much information, if any on what was causing it, but if you cleared all of the dtcs it would do the same thing where it would crank, fire, then die. And it would do the same thing a dozen or so times, and eventually it would start and run, but the difference is that it would run and actually be drivable. Whereas now if you can drive it at all, it goes into reduced power mode almost immediately, and even then it's not running correctly. When you come to a stop at a light it stumbles down to for 500 RPM before catching itself and returning to the smooth idle. And if you go more than about 50% throttle then it immediately goes back to doing the misfire thing.    Like I said, I know that throws a wrench into things, and unfortunately I was not able to pull any data or anything like that before I did this work, so I don't have much to go on.    I'm trying to not fixate on one particular thing as the cause of the problem, but it seems like all avenues are pointing me towards the PCM. Like I said I have tested the wiring extensively (see above), and during cranking the sensor does produce seemingly legitimate values at least according to my multimeter, but as soon as the engine fires those values quickly descend into gibberish. I've tried it with multiple different known working sensors, I have done literally every test I can think of multiple times on the wiring (probing the signals, probing the pins with the sensors unplugged, probing the pins at the PCM, voltage drop, voltage drop under load, continuity, ohms, and double-checking everything against the wiring diagrams/ proper values in the service data.)    Another thing that pushes me towards a possible PCM failure is, I have noticed in troubleshooting a little bit taking a break and coming back, that when I leave the truck to sit for a while and cool off, it starts and runs smoothly when I first start it up. However once it warms up. It starts having problems. For example, when I went out to the truck this morning after it had been sitting overnight, I was actually able to drive it down the block. And then once I got on the throttle a Little bit after going about a thousand ft, it started misfiring again. I pulled it back into the driveway, shut it down, and started it back up. It idled smoothly. As soon as I touched the throttle it did the misfire thing again. From then on as soon as I started it it would misfire. I shut the truck off and went to go get a coffee and do a bit more research. When I came back out I started the truck up and it immediately went into the smooth idle. After a couple of minutes of playing around with it, it would not idle smoothly anymore. Let it sit a couple of hours, rinse and repeat. This makes me think with temperature change something is going wrong inside the PCM. I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle and I'm thinking of getting a one-day subscription to the ACDelco programming service to try and program that and see if it helps.   Like I said, I'm really trying to not fixate myself on one potential cause, but it seems everything is pointing me towards PCM failure. I would really like to try to confirm that, but unfortunately I don't have an oscilloscope or a signal generator to do the GM service procedure where you feed 5 khz into the signal pin. 
    • Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...