Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Thanks, Sent texas speed a email, ordering their headers as well. Might do a port n polish on the heads. Have to talk to the shop and see what they recommend. They have been working on ls motors since the beginning. They just might say bite the bullet and do super charger who knows.

 

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

 

Buy a whipple...use it for a bit and then sell it to me for a fair price [emoji51]

 

Edit...ever talk to that biggerdogg guy, wonder how his setup is doing [emoji848]

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Ever watch those YouTube video's on stage building normally asperated engines? Same motor over several 'stages' of build? Eventually they all hit a ceiling whose height is chained to the fuels resistance to knock. When they hit that ceiling they may get one or two more increases in horsepower but the peak torque number stays pretty close to the knock limit. More power it obtained by moving the same peak torque further up the rpm scale. 

 

If your old enough you've seen this played out by OEM engineers. About 50 years ago 87 octane fuel had a mechanical compression ratio limit between 8.0:1 and 8.5:1. Now it's closer to 11:1 to 12:1. Go back 50 years further and the limits were nearer 5.0:1. Back then getting big increases in torque, that thing that makes towing easier, was not that difficult. Many of the OMG moments in these videos are provided with motors of that era that are being treated to todays technology. 

 

Where ever you stop along that time line you could bring the oldest to the performance of the newest but never beyond. And as this was happening, and if you were paying close attention, you would have noticed that as power levels went up the rpm was coming down which meant that other factors besides mechanical compression ratio that influence  knock were constantly being fretted out. Chamber shapes, fuel introduction methods, camshaft profile and manipulation, to name a few. 

 

To get 465 horsepower out of a 6 liter motor in the mid 60's on 93 pump fuel would have required a dedicated race motor builder spinning it a couple of thousand rpm higher than the OEM does now. 

 

Still getting a 50 pounds/feet increase in torque at the same rpm? 

 

Here's a link to a cam swap that does ALMOST as you ask: (peak torque rpm placement is quite a bit higher) 

 

https://www.hotrod.com/articles/l92-6-2l-camshaft-dyno-test/

 

After reading this link and reviewing the dyno charts ask yourself if this motor is the motor you want to use towing

 

The factory 6.2 is already a beast by any yardstick you care to measure it with....apples to apples ? 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted

Back in the day we did light modifications to our big block gas motors for towing. Gearing was the most gains were for pulling. One of our first tow vehicles was a two ton wrecker we put a tow ball in. It was a 6 cylinder with a 4 speed, two speed rear. It would pull our 7K gooseneck trailer and 14K tractor with ease up to 65 mph. Later with light engine mods we added gear vendors to accomplish the same result. After pulling my brother in laws large camper with his Ford diesel. I can’t imagine the need for additional mods.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
Buy a whipple...use it for a bit and then sell it to me for a fair price [emoji51]
 
Edit...ever talk to that biggerdogg guy, wonder how his setup is doing [emoji848]
Have not heard back from him..curious too

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
    • Probably a one and done post, but do you have a CEL on the dash? Was having issues with my transmission, fortunately only a week, and it turned out to be the transmission harness. Valve body was in good shape, so new harness with all the sensors attached, new fluid, and filter. Seems to have worked so far?
    • Two interesting tidbits of information which are NOT related were just released.   One, regarding the possible thrust bearing issues / engine failures with the 3.0. Demonworks just did a segment in which they believe they may have found "a" or "the" cause of thrust bearing failures: A missing thrust bearing. If the engine doesn't have all its thrust bearings from the factory, the missing bearing can cause extra play which ends up destroying a nearby thrust bearing which then sends metal through the engine.       Of other importance, Lake Speed Jr released some interest information regarding oil weight selection for the 3.0. Comparisons of:   AcDelco 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w30 Mobil 1 ESP x4 0w40. Mobil Delvac 5w40   Spoiler alert: The Mobils are PAO Ester -base and the ACDelco is a Group III base. Mobil shows lower wear in their tests for similar weights. Additive packages between 20-30-40 weight ESP's appear to be the same, but only 0w20 is Dexos D licensed. Wear is even more reduced with 30 and 40 weight ESP although all perform very well and resist shear and provide very similar viscosities within temperature operating ranges in the 3.0.   There are even more surprises, so just go watch it.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...