Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Changed oil before roadtrip from Kansas to Colorado little over a month ago. Kansas had single digit and below freezing temps just before we left. Truck ran great there and back. Few weeks later I noticed the truck started idling really rough. Checked the oil to find was almost an entire quart low. Drain plug and filter were clean and no pools on the garage floor. I run a JLT catch can which I also emptied before our trip. I suspect the can froze at some point between leaving for and returning from CO. Can anyone tell me what kind of damage I might have done if the can was frozen and prevented oil vapors from evacuating? Explain the loss of oil?  Truck runs fine now and never threw any codes.  2020 5.3 LT Trail Boss 10sp with DFM, 14k miles. Only put 1200 miles on it between oil change and oil loss.  

Edited by ICTWildcat
Posted (edited)

If the can froze then IMO its mounted to far away from engine heat that would have helped dissipate the moisture that the can caused because it cools faster than the engine.. 

 

PS, I don't see how that could have caused any engine damage.

Edited by elcamino
Posted
4 minutes ago, elcamino said:

If the can froze then IMO its mounted to far away from engine heat that would have helped dissipate the moisture that the can caused because it cools faster than the engine.. 

 

PS, I don't see how that could have caused any engine damage.

I'm more concerned about where the quart of oil went honestly. 

Posted

Some if it was sucked out in the can.  You don't say what year make model and mileage. Oil used could be normal.  Some AFM engines consume oil at a high rate and often it comes on suddenly.  

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, elcamino said:

Some if it was sucked out in the can.  You don't say what year make model and mileage. Oil used could be normal.  Some AFM engines consume oil at a high rate and often it comes on suddenly.  

Sorry left that out didn't I. Updated... 2020 5.3 LT Trail Boss with 10 sp and DFM 14k miles.  Only 1200 miles between oil change and lost oil. 

Edited by ICTWildcat
Posted
9 hours ago, ICTWildcat said:

Sorry left that out didn't I. Updated... 2020 5.3 LT Trail Boss with 10 sp and DFM.  Only 1200 miles between oil change and lost oil. 

But he's asking for mileage on the truck, not between oil changes.

Posted
3 hours ago, eppieguy said:

But he's asking for mileage on the truck, not between oil changes.

Added....14k miles total. It shouldn't be burning a qt with any miles on it honestly. Not even at 7500 mile intervals between changes and I change every 5000. 

Posted

I would be surprised if the catch can freezing would be an issue. I had one on my 2015 for over 4 years mounted in front near windshield washer reservoir and never had any issues. We frequently get negative teens or colder in the winter. 

Posted
12 hours ago, lapoolboy said:

Can't say ******....😂😂😂

Ha! Nothing wrong with changing that often. I do mine at 5k which I think is still more frequent than GM recommends on the newer trucks. 

Posted
9 hours ago, wurgs said:

I would be surprised if the catch can freezing would be an issue. I had one on my 2015 for over 4 years mounted in front near windshield washer reservoir and never had any issues. We frequently get negative teens or colder in the winter. 

I wouldn't have thought that initially either but I purchased a different brand with a larger capacity and just got it yesterday. They included a disclaimer about not warrantying if it freezes and check more routinely in colder climates. Maybe it was half full when it froze?  Where would the oil go if the can was full? I emptied it before the trip btw, so not like I neglect to check it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...