Jump to content

LTZ or RST 6.2 with max tow payload

JJ9145
 Share

Recommended Posts

JJ9145 Enthusiast

JJ9145

Posted
Posted

Hello all. I'm looking to get back into a Chevy truck after 2 Rams. The only engine I want is the 6.2 with the 10spd and max tow. We will probably be towing a travel trailer down the road and was looking to see what the payload is on the LTZ and RST trucks. As everyone knows there are zero trucks around to look at so I'm looking for some help. Thanks

OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted

My LTZ max tow 6.2 payload is 1,914 pounds.

 

You can figure a lighter equipped LTZ or RST would be bit higher.

AlaskaErik Enthusiast

AlaskaErik

Posted
Posted

My max tow LTZ has 1910 lbs of payload.  But you need to look at the yellow driver door jamb sticker of each truck you're interested in in order to get the exact payload capacity of that particular truck.  But the real question is, how much does your trailer weigh fully loaded?  Multiply that amount by 13 percent for a WAG on your tongue weight if it's a travel trailer you're looking to tow.  Too many people try to push the extreme limits of a half ton when they really should be looking at a 3/4 ton or one ton.

AlaskaErik Enthusiast

AlaskaErik

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, redwngr said:

Trailer rating for 6.2 max tow crew cab 4wd will be around 11,900

The problem with that figure is it's based on a 10 percent tongue weight.  A travel trailer will be closer to a 13 percent tongue weight, meaning you'll exceed hitch weight limit if you try to tow 11,900 lbs.

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
Trailer rating for 6.2 max tow crew cab 4wd will be around 11,900
I thought GM said a RST 6.2 Max Tow crew cab 4wd was 13,300

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

JJ9145 Enthusiast

JJ9145

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 hours ago, AlaskaErik said:

My max tow LTZ has 1910 lbs of payload.  But you need to look at the yellow driver door jamb sticker of each truck you're interested in in order to get the exact payload capacity of that particular truck.  But the real question is, how much does your trailer weigh fully loaded?  Multiply that amount by 13 percent for a WAG on your tongue weight if it's a travel trailer you're looking to tow.  Too many people try to push the extreme limits of a half ton when they really should be looking at a 3/4 ton or one ton.

Yes I guess I should have asked for everyone to respond with their door sticker. We are looking at a TT around 5k unload. Thanks

JJ9145 Enthusiast

JJ9145

Posted
  • Author
Posted

As far as max payload we don't plan on getting near that. If I can get at least 1900 payload from a LTZ then a RST I would think be just a little higher. This where the Ram falls short but they offer a bigger fuel tank which takes away from their smaller payload a little more.

TNTSierra Senior Enthusiast

TNTSierra

Posted
Posted (edited)

I don’t know why so many people b!tch@ about the small fuel tank??  It’s the perfect size, it keeps weight down, which increases payload and fuel economy. 
So what if you have to stop one more time.  90% or higher who have trucks, have families and it’s a great time to get out, stretch your legs, get a snack and a restroom break. I’ve never found it as a hinderance when driving up I29 going to my lake house. 
Oh and I would go with an LTZ fully loaded. I like the chrome bumper. My High Country is painted and it’s got a little road rash. My 2018 SLT Sierra had a chrome bumper and it was perfect after 2 harsh winters. Good luck with your decision 

Edited by TNTSilverado
JJ9145 Enthusiast

JJ9145

Posted
  • Author
Posted

TNTSilverado I agree about the fuel tank size. Nowadays I like to stop and stretch my retired body haha. I didn't tow with either Ram truck and didn't have the the larger tank. My main thing is getting the highest payload and performance I can get from a 1/2 ton and have a comfy interior without going to a 3/4 ton.

  • Like 1
Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted

I agree with TNT, but for the reasons JJ wants. The LTZ is more comfy. You'll pay more for it, too. LTZ has heated and cooled seats. RST will only have heated seats. LTZ has factory navigation and Android Auto/Apple Carplay. RST will only have Android Auto/Apple Carplay. There are a few other creature comforts the LTZ has. It all depends on what you want and how much you're willing to spend.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Transient said:

I thought GM said a RST 6.2 Max Tow crew cab 4wd was 13,300

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

The only one in the chart that shows 13,300 is on the 6.2  DC 4wd with NHT (CK10753)

Requires 20" wheels.  When equipped with 18: wheels the rating of the CK10753 drops to 12,100. 

 

Chart ignores trim level truck weight differences.

 

 

Edited by redwngr
JCattSS Enthusiast

JCattSS

Posted
Posted

Payload and towing will depend on configuration and options. My RST has a crew cab, 6.5 bed, 6.2, 10 speed, max tow. Trailering capacity is 11,900 and payload is 1806. It has the fancy tailgate and moonroof so that's eating up some payload. A couple options that I could do without but its what was available. Coming from a Lariat Ultimate to an RST I do miss some of the creature comforts, but all that comes with a cost. I guess it depends on what you are used to and what options are important. 

AlaskaErik Enthusiast

AlaskaErik

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Transient said:

I agree with TNT, but for the reasons JJ wants. The LTZ is more comfy. You'll pay more for it, too. LTZ has heated and cooled seats. RST will only have heated seats. LTZ has factory navigation and Android Auto/Apple Carplay. RST will only have Android Auto/Apple Carplay. There are a few other creature comforts the LTZ has. It all depends on what you want and how much you're willing to spend.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

My LTZ does not have factory nav.

OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted

Navigation comes in LTZ Convenience Package II, which is also a part of the LTZ Premium Package.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined

  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,136 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • scotthvac.net
      2022-24 halogen - led grille swap

      By scotthvac.net · Posted

      2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • davester
      Replacement Radiator

      By davester · Posted

      And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...